Literature DB >> 15963384

Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend.

Nuala Brady1, Mark Campbell, Mary Flaherty.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of familiarity on people's perception of facial likeness by asking participants to choose which of two mirror-symmetric chimeric images (made from the left or right half of a photograph of a face) looked more like an original image. In separate trials the participants made this judgment for their own face and for the face of a close friend; half of them matched to a true image of the original and half matched to a mirror image of the original. In the case of matching to a friend's face presented in the familiar orientation, over 80% of participants chose the left-left composite to be a better likeness to the original, whereas only 62% showed the same left-side bias when matching to a mirror image. The difference is significant, and the result contrasts markedly with a second experiment where participants who were unfamiliar with the faces showed comparable left-side biases when matching to true or mirror reversed images. The result suggests that perceptual asymmetries are retained in our long-term memory for highly familiar faces. While matching to images of self also showed an effect of familiarity, the data in this condition show less evidence of perceptual asymmetry and are discussed in relation to recent research on the representation of one's own face.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15963384     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  21 in total

1.  Cosmetic appreciation of lateralization of peripheral facial palsy: 'preference for left or right, true or mirror image?'.

Authors:  Sjaak Pouwels; Koen Ingels; Niels van Heerbeek; Carien Beurskens
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The left-side bias is not unique to own-race face processing.

Authors:  Chenglin Li; Zhiguo Wang; Hui Bao; Jianping Wang; Shuang Chen; Xiaohua Cao
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Consistent left gaze bias in processing different facial cues.

Authors:  Kun Guo; Claire Smith; Kathryn Powell; Kelly Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-11

4.  Lateralization of kin recognition signals in the human face.

Authors:  Maria F Dal Martello; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Non-invasive neurostimulation modulates processing of spatial frequency information in rapid perception of faces.

Authors:  Bhuvanesh Awasthi
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Goedele van Belle; Meike Ramon; Philippe Lefèvre; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-06-17

7.  Left-right facial orientation of familiar faces: developmental aspects of « the mere exposure hypothesis ».

Authors:  Anouck Amestoy; Manuel P Bouvard; Jean-René Cazalets
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-09-14

8.  Shared or separate mechanisms for self-face and other-face processing? Evidence from adaptation.

Authors:  Brendan Rooney; Helen Keyes; Nuala Brady
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-07

9.  The other in me: interpersonal multisensory stimulation changes the mental representation of the self.

Authors:  Ana Tajadura-Jiménez; Stephanie Grehl; Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Looking for myself: current multisensory input alters self-face recognition.

Authors:  Manos Tsakiris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.