| Literature DB >> 34667192 |
Antonio Francavilla1,2, Amedeo Gagliardi1,2, Giulia Piaggeschi1,2, Giulio Ferrero3,4, Barbara Pardini1,2, Alessio Naccarati5,6, Sonia Tarallo1,2, Francesca Cordero3, Ruggero G Pensa3, Alessia Impeduglia3, Gian Paolo Caviglia7, Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone7, Gaetano Gallo8, Sara Grioni9.
Abstract
For their stability and detectability faecal microRNAs represent promising molecules with potential clinical interest as non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. However, there is no evidence on how stool miRNA profiles change according to an individual's age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) or how lifestyle habits influence the expression levels of these molecules. We explored the relationship between the stool miRNA levels and common traits (sex, age, BMI, and menopausal status) or lifestyle habits (physical activity, smoking status, coffee, and alcohol consumption) as derived by a self-reported questionnaire, using small RNA-sequencing data of samples from 335 healthy subjects. We detected 151 differentially expressed miRNAs associated with one variable and 52 associated with at least two. Differences in miR-638 levels were associated with age, sex, BMI, and smoking status. The highest number of differentially expressed miRNAs was associated with BMI (n = 92) and smoking status (n = 84), with several miRNAs shared between them. Functional enrichment analyses revealed the involvement of the miRNA target genes in pathways coherent with the analysed variables. Our findings suggest that miRNA profiles in stool may reflect common traits and lifestyle habits and should be considered in relation to disease and association studies based on faecal miRNA expression.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34667192 PMCID: PMC8526833 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00014-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Workflow of the study.
Study population characteristics.
| Female (N = 213) | Male (N = 122) | Overall (N = 335) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | 43.9 ± 14.5 | 46.1 ± 15.0 | 44.7 ± 14.7 |
| Median [Min, Max] | 44.0 [18.0, 80.0] | 48.0 [19.0, 81.0] | 45.0 [18.0, 81.0] |
| 18–37 | 84 (39.4%) | 38 (31.1%) | 122 (36.4%) |
| 37–53 | 66 (31.0%) | 45 (36.9%) | 111 (33.1%) |
| 53–81 | 63 (29.6%) | 39 (32.0%) | 102 (30.5%) |
| Mean ± SD | 22.4 ± 3.7 | 24.5 ± 3.6 | 23.1 ± 3.8 |
| Median [Min, Max] | 21.9 [15.4, 39.9] | 24.1 [17.2, 35.8] | 22.6 [15.4, 39.9] |
| Missing (%) | 5 (2.3%) | 6 (4.9%) | 11 (3.3%) |
| Underweight | 23 (10.8%) | 2 (1.6%) | 25 (7.5%) |
| Normal | 145 (68.1%) | 70 (57.4%) | 215 (64.2%) |
| Overweight | 32 (15.0%) | 34 (27.9%) | 66 (19.7%) |
| Obese | 8 (3.8%) | 10 (8.2%) | 18 (5.4%) |
| Missing | 5 (2.3%) | 6 (4.9%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| Current smoker | 37 (17.4%) | 20 (16.4%) | 57 (17.0%) |
| < 16 cigs/day | 28 (13.1%) | 13 (10.6%) | 41 (12.2%) |
| > 16 cigs/day | 9 (4.2%) | 7 (5.7%) | 16 (4.8%) |
| Former smoker | 50 (23.5%) | 44 (36.1%) | 94 (28.1%) |
| Never smoker | 125 (58.7%) | 56 (45.9%) | 181 (54.0%) |
| Missing | 1 (0.4%) | 2 (1.6%) | 3 (0.9%) |
| Non drinkers | 23 (10.8%) | 6 (4.9%) | 29 (8.7%) |
| Low intake drinkers | 151 (70.9%) | 79 (64.8%) | 230 (68.7%) |
| High intake drinkers | 38 (17.8%) | 37 (30.3%) | 75 (22.4%) |
| Non drinkers | 89 (41.8%) | 46 (37.7%) | 135 (40.3%) |
| Low intake drinkers | 96 (45.1%) | 53 (43.4%) | 149 (44.5%) |
| High intake drinkers | 27 (12.7%) | 23 (18.9%) | 50 (14.9%) |
| Active | 14 (6.6%) | 7 (5.7%) | 21 (6.3%) |
| Moderately active | 63 (29.6%) | 45 (36.9%) | 108 (32.2%) |
| Moderately inactive | 72 (33.8%) | 42 (34.4%) | 114 (34.0%) |
| Inactive | 63 (29.6%) | 27 (22.1%) | 90 (26.9%) |
| Missing | 1 (0.4%) | 1 (0.9%) | 2 (0.6%) |
| Premenopausal | 132 (62.0%) | - | - |
| Postmenopausal | 77 (36.2%) | - | - |
| Missing | 4 (1.8%) | - | - |
*BMI was categorized according to the World Health Organization guidelines as underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2) and obese (30.0–34.9 kg/m2).
**Alcohol consumption was categorized according to the alcohol intake measured in gr/day: non-drinkers (0 gr/day), low intake drinkers (< 24 gr/day for males and < 12 gr/day for females) and high intake drinkers (> 24 gr/day for males and > 12 gr/day for females).
***Coffee consumption was categorized according to the coffee intake measured in g/day: non-drinkers (0 gr/day), low intake drinkers (1–16 gr/day) and high intake drinkers (> 16 gr/day).
Figure 2(a) Scatter plot showing the stool miRNA inter-individual variability expressed as a relation between median expression levels and coefficient of variation (CV). Red dots represent miRNAs detected in all samples. On the left of the dotted line are reported those miRNAs characterised by the lowest CV. (b) Scatter plots showing the stool miRNA intra-individual variability of four selected subjects who provided a stool sample at two different time points.
Figure 3(a–c) Box plots showing the expression levels of selected differentially expressed miRNAs among individuals stratified according to the investigated common trait: sex (a), age (b), and BMI (c). P-values were computed by DESeq2 and adjusted using the FDR method. ***adj.p < 0.001, **adj.p < 0.01, *adj.p < 0.05.
Figure 4(a–d) Box plots showing the expression levels of selected DEmiRNAs among individuals stratified according to the investigated lifestyle habits: smoking status (a), alcohol (b) or coffee (c) consumption, and physical activity (d). P-values were computed by DESeq2 and adjusted using the FDR method. ***adj.p < 0.001, **adj.p < 0.01, *adj.p < 0.05.
Figure 5Heatmap reporting, separately for males and females, the results of the hierarchical clustering of 52 DEmiRNAs significantly associated with two or more variables. For each DEmiRNA, the z-score of log10 read count for each sample is reported.
Figure 6Dot plots showing the statistical significance of the GO Biological Process enriched terms considering the DEmiRNA validated target genes obtained for each of the analysed variables. The size of the dots is proportional to the significance of the enrichment while the number of target genes belonging to each term is reported on the x-axis. The colour code refers to the coefficient computed by RBiomirGS. Negative (in blue) and positive (in red) coefficients represent processes predicted to be down-regulated or up-regulated, respectively, based on the different miRNA expression levels between comparisons.