BACKGROUND AND GOALS: The use of fecal calprotectin (FC) as a stool biomarker for differentiating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from IBS has been well validated, and there is a strong correlation between FC and the presence of endoscopic inflammatory lesions. However, recent studies have demonstrated intraindividual sample variability in patients with IBD, possibly limiting the reliability of using a single sample for monitoring disease activity. Our aim was to assess the within-stool and within-day sample variability of FC concentrations in patients with IBD. STUDY: We examined a cross-sectional cohort of 50 adult IBD patients. Eligible patients were instructed to collect 3 samples from different parts of the stool from their first bowel movement of the day and 3 samples from each of up to 2 additional bowel movements within 24 hours. FC concentrations were measured by a rapid, quantitative point-of-care test using lateral flow technology (Quantum Blue). Descriptive statistics were used to assess FC variability within a single bowel movement and between different movements at different FC positivity cutoffs. RESULTS: Within a single bowel movement, there was clinically significant sample variability ranging from 8% to 23% depending on the time of the day or on the FC positivity cutoff value. Between bowel movements, there was clinically significant sample variability ranging from 13% to 26% depending on the FC positivity cutoff. CONCLUSIONS: Considering a single FC sample, the first sample of the day with an FC positivity cutoff of 250 μg/g provided the most reliable indication of disease activity.
BACKGROUND AND GOALS: The use of fecal calprotectin (FC) as a stool biomarker for differentiating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from IBS has been well validated, and there is a strong correlation between FC and the presence of endoscopic inflammatory lesions. However, recent studies have demonstrated intraindividual sample variability in patients with IBD, possibly limiting the reliability of using a single sample for monitoring disease activity. Our aim was to assess the within-stool and within-day sample variability of FC concentrations in patients with IBD. STUDY: We examined a cross-sectional cohort of 50 adult IBD patients. Eligible patients were instructed to collect 3 samples from different parts of the stool from their first bowel movement of the day and 3 samples from each of up to 2 additional bowel movements within 24 hours. FC concentrations were measured by a rapid, quantitative point-of-care test using lateral flow technology (Quantum Blue). Descriptive statistics were used to assess FC variability within a single bowel movement and between different movements at different FC positivity cutoffs. RESULTS: Within a single bowel movement, there was clinically significant sample variability ranging from 8% to 23% depending on the time of the day or on the FC positivity cutoff value. Between bowel movements, there was clinically significant sample variability ranging from 13% to 26% depending on the FC positivity cutoff. CONCLUSIONS: Considering a single FC sample, the first sample of the day with an FC positivity cutoff of 250 μg/g provided the most reliable indication of disease activity.
Authors: Ferdinando D'Amico; David T Rubin; Paulo Gustavo Kotze; Fernando Magro; Britta Siegmund; Taku Kobayashi; Pablo A Olivera; Peter Bossuyt; Lieven Pouillon; Edouard Louis; Eugeni Domènech; Subrata Ghosh; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2021-05-07 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Elsa A van Wassenaer; Kay Diederen; Ester M M van Leeuwen; Geert R D'Haens; Marc A Benninga; Bart G P Koot; Angelika Kindermann Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Viktor Domislovic; Joachim Høg Mortensen; Majken Lindholm; Morten Asser Kaarsdal; Marko Brinar; Ana Barisic; Tina Manon-Jensen; Zeljko Krznaric Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-10-07 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: James P Campbell; Claudia Zierold; Ashli M Rode; Frank A Blocki; Byron P Vaughn Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.174