Literature DB >> 34667135

Circulating Tumor Cell Detection in Lung Cancer Animal Model.

Yooyoung Chong1, Yong Chae Jung1, Euidoo Hwang1, Hyun Jin Cho1, Min-Woong Kang1, Myung Hoon Na1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metastasis and recurrence of primary cancer are the main causes of cancer mortality. Disseminated tumor cells refer to cancer cells that cause metastasis from primary cancer to other organs. Several recent studies have suggested that circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with the clinical stage, cancer recurrence, cancer metastasis, and prognosis. There are several methods of isolating CTCs from whole blood; in particular, using a membrane filtration system is advantageous due to its cost-effectiveness and availability in clinical settings. In this study, an animal model of lung cancer was established in nude mice using the human large cell lung cancer cell line H460.
METHODS: Six-week-old nude mice were used. The H460 lung cancer cell line was injected subcutaneously into the nude mice. Blood samples were obtained from the orbital area before cell line injection, 2 weeks after injection, and 2 weeks after tumor excision. Blood samples were filtered using a polycarbonate 12-well Transwell membrane (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). An indirect immunofluorescence assay was performed with the epithelial cell adhesion molecule antibody. The number of stained cells was counted using fluorescence microscopy.
RESULTS: The average size of the tumor masses was 35.83 mm. The stained cells were counted before inoculation, 2 weeks after inoculation, and 2 weeks after tumor excision. Cancer cells generally increased after inoculation and decreased after tumor resection.
CONCLUSION: The CTC detection method using the commercial polycarbonate 12-well Transwell (Corning Inc.) membrane is advantageous in terms of cost-effectiveness and convenience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model; Lung neoplasms; Malignant tumor

Year:  2021        PMID: 34667135      PMCID: PMC8646057          DOI: 10.5090/jcs.21.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chest Surg        ISSN: 2765-1606


Introduction

Cancer is the leading cause of death in most industrialized counties. Metastasis and recurrence of primary cancer are the main causes of cancer mortality [1]. Disseminated tumor cells refer to cancer cells that cause metastasis from primary cancer to other organs [2]. Among these cancer cells, those that penetrate the blood vessel wall and float in the blood circulation are known as circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Several recent studies have suggested that CTCs are associated with the clinical stage, cancer recurrence, cancer metastasis, and prognosis [3-6]. When the number of CTCs in blood samples from breast cancer patients was 5 or more, the recurrence rate was higher and the survival rate was lower than in patients with a lower CTC count [7]. There are several methods of isolating CTCs from whole blood. The oldest method is the density gradient centrifugation method, wherein CTCs are isolated with immunohistochemical staining of the epithelial marker cytokeratin from cells separated by centrifuging whole blood [8]. However, this method has the disadvantages of being time-consuming and costly, as well as having a reproducibility of less than 70%. Another method is to use magnetic beads. Magnetic bead technology separates CTCs from whole blood through the magnetic force exerted by magnetic beads attached to antibodies. However, as there is considerable variability in the quantity of proteins expressed in the cell membrane of each cancer cell, the yield ratio varies significantly, from 9% to 90% [8-11]. Moreover, expensive equipment is required to detect the separated CTCs. Another method of CTC separation is based on the different sizes of cells in the blood. This technique, known as the membrane filtration system (MEMS) method, takes advantage of the fact that CTCs are larger than red blood cells or platelets [12,13]. The MEMS method using a microfabricated filter has the advantages of being cheaper than other methods; furthermore, it is possible to freely change the size and location of the pores, and the equipment is easily available in clinical settings as it only requires immunostaining after filtering the collected blood with the MEMS, which does not take a long time. In a recent CTC detection study using MEMS, an 8-μm pore was used to isolate CTCs, and 90% of CTCs were detected within a short time [14]. In this study, an animal model of lung cancer was established by subcutaneous tissue injection in nude mice using the human large cell lung cancer cell line H460. CTCs were then detected in the blood of these mice using a commercially available filtering system with a pore size of 8 μm. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the applicability of this tool for the filtration and detection of CTCs.

Methods

To establish the animal model, 6-week-old nude mice weighing 25 g were used. Briefly, 1×106 cells were injected into the subcutaneous tissue in the posterolateral regions of the chest and abdomen of nude mice. After injection of the lung cancer cell line, 1 mL of blood was collected from the periorbital area into an ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tube containing 1 mL of normal saline. Two weeks after the injection of the lung cancer cell line, 1 mg of ketamine and 0.1 mg of xylazine were injected intraperitoneally for anesthesia. Then, 1 mL of blood was collected from the area around the eye in the same manner mentioned above. After blood collection, the mass was resected along with the surrounding subcutaneous tissue; the area was then sutured. Two weeks after resection of the tumor mass, 1 mL of blood was collected from the area around the eye in the same manner. To detect CTCs, a commercially available MEMS system was used. All blood samples were immediately transferred to a 12-well Transwell membrane (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) after collection into EDTA tubes for filtering for 10 minutes (Fig. 1). After filtration, an indirect immunofluorescence assay was performed.
Fig. 1

(A, B) Schematic diagram of the method used to capture circulating tumor cells with a Transwell membrane (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA).

The indirect immunofluorescence method was performed following the instructions for the reagent. A commercially available slide (IT-APF; ImmunoThink Co., Seoul, Korea) was used. The serum was diluted to 1:20. To each well of the slide, 30 μL of diluted serum was aliquoted, reacted at 37°C for 60 minutes, and washed for 10 minutes in phosphate-buffered saline. A secondary antibody (fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rabbit anti-human gamma-globulin) was aliquoted, reacted at 37°C for 30 minutes, and washed again. The slide was then observed using fluorescence microscopy. This experiment was finished before the Chungnam National University Hospital Pre-Clinical Research Center was established (August 2013). However, the research followed the Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals [15-17].

Results

The animal model of lung cancer was established by the injection of H460 cells into the subcutaneous tissue of nude mice. H460 cells (1×106) were injected into the posterolateral subcutaneous tissues of the abdomen, considering the weight of nude mice. Although it was confirmed that cancerous tumors grew under the skin 2 weeks after inoculation in the nude mice, the size of the tumor was slightly different for each individual. The sizes of the masses were 30, 39, 40, 39, 42, and 25 mm for nude mice no. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, respectively, with an average size of 35.83 mm (Fig. 2). Mass resection was performed immediately after the second blood collection. There were no cases of mass recurrence in the 2-week period after mass resection.
Fig. 2

(A–F) Mass formation: 2 weeks after H460 cell inoculation.

Blood collection was performed 3 times. All samples were obtained by orbital blood collection, and blood was collected before the H460 inoculation, 2 weeks after inoculation, and 2 weeks after mass removal. After collecting 1 mL of blood, it was mixed with 1 mL of physiological saline and stored in an EDTA tube. Blood was collected from the 6 mice successfully without any complications. Membrane filtering was performed within 5 minutes after blood collection. After transferring the blood samples to a 12-well Transwell (Corning Inc.) membrane and filtering for 10 minutes, it was confirmed that all blood samples came down to the lower cover of the Transwell (Corning Inc.) membrane, and no blood clots occurred in any of the 6 samples during the experiment. After confirming that filtration was complete, the upper cover with the cell filter was separated, and only the lower floor plate was removed; then, the indirect immunofluorescence assay was performed. After membrane filtration, CTCs were confirmed through indirect immunofluorescence with epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and CD45. In nude mouse no. 1, 45 cells were stained with fluorescence before inoculation with H460. After 2 weeks, 134 cells were stained in the blood before mass resection, and 150 cells were stained 2 weeks after resection. Nude mouse no. 2 had 55 stained cells before inoculation, 16 stained cells before mass resection, and no stained cells 2 weeks after mass resection. Nude mouse no. 3 had 15 stained cells before inoculation, 163 stained cells before mass resection, and 35 stained cells 2 weeks after mass resection. Nude mouse no. 4 had no stained cells before inoculation, 27 stained cells before mass resection, and 13 stained cells 2 weeks after mass resection. Nude mouse no. 5 had 5 stained cells before inoculation, 182 stained cells before mass resection, and 3 stained cells 2 weeks after mass resection. Nude mouse no. 6 had no stained cells before inoculation, 2 stained cells before mass resection, and 3 stained cells 2 weeks after mass resection (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

(A–F) Results of indirect immunofluorescence.

An increase in CTC levels after inoculation was confirmed in 5 out of the 6 nude mice (80%). The number of cancer cells tended to decrease after tumor resection. It was not possible to confirm the recurrence of tumors after resection.

Discussion

CTC detection was performed using a membrane filtration system in the blood of a mouse model of lung cancer. The membrane filtration system is a detection method that takes advantage of the fact that tumor cells of epithelial origin are larger than other cells in the blood. In a previous study using a membrane filtration system with a pore size of 8 µm, 90% of CTCs were detected when cancer cells were mixed into human blood. As well as H406, A549 cells (with cell diameters of approximately 15 µm) have been widely used as research models for lung epithelial structure and the occurrence, development, and treatment of lung cancer [18-20]. In the present study, we conducted a preliminary clinical trial based on this finding and detected CTCs using indirect immunofluorescence in blood samples collected from an established subcutaneous lung cancer animal model using nude mice, rather than artificially mixing the cancer cells with blood. Contrary to the prediction that the cells of epithelial origin detected by the EpCAM antibody in the blood collected prior to inoculating cancer cells into nude mice would not be detected in this study, cell staining by indirect immunofluorescence showed positive results in 4 mice. This could have been due to many factors. It is possible that cells of epithelial origin contaminated orbital blood collection as a result of damage to the tissues surrounding the eyes. Although the growth of tumor masses showed individual differences after the subcutaneous inoculation of H460 cancer cells, mass formation was successfully achieved in all nude mice. In addition, the number of cells stained by indirect immunofluorescence significantly increased in the blood collected before mass resection in 5 mice, except for mouse no. 2. However, there was no linear correlation between the size of the mass and the number of detected CTCs. This seems irrelevant to the characteristics of cancer cells because the same cell line was used; rather, it seems to be an issue of the sensitivity of the detection method, as well as individual differences in the number of CTCs. A decrease in CTCs 2 weeks after mass resection was observed in all mice, except for mice no. 1 and 6. Recurrence of the mass was not observed in any of the experimental mice; however, mouse no. 1 showed a significant increase in the number of CTCs. This was believed to be associated with cancer metastasis to other areas. Although a biopsy was performed, there were no clear findings of metastasis to the lungs or other organs. The CTC detection method using the commercial polycarbonate 12-well Transwell membrane (Corning Inc.) to isolate cells has the advantages of low cost and convenience for use in experiments, unlike other membrane filtering systems that require the assembly of detection equipment. In addition, the detection of CTCs in blood in an animal model of large cell lung cancer, rather than the detection of tumor cells in human blood mixed with cancer cells as in previous studies, is an experiment closer to the in vivo environment. Nonetheless, many stained cells were detected in the blood before the subcutaneous inoculation of cancer cells. In other words, the false-positive rate was high, and a disadvantage of this method is that the accuracy may be compromised by counting the number of stained cells visually. Therefore, to reduce the false-positive rate, a method for reducing contamination of other cells during blood collection should be devised. Furthermore, it would be desirable to use an objective counting method using flow cytometry, such as fluorescence-activated cell sorting.
  16 in total

1.  The morphometrical analysis on the ultrastructure of A549 cells.

Authors:  Run-de Jiang; Hong Shen; Ying-Jie Piao
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells : a new method for the immunomorphological and molecular characterization of circulatingtumor cells.

Authors:  G Vona; A Sabile; M Louha; V Sitruk; S Romana; K Schütze; F Capron; D Franco; M Pazzagli; M Vekemans; B Lacour; C Bréchot; P Paterlini-Bréchot
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Circulating tumor cells: a novel prognostic factor for newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Massimo Cristofanilli; Daniel F Hayes; G Thomas Budd; Mathew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; James M Reuben; Gerald V Doyle; Jeri Matera; W Jeffrey Allard; M Craig Miller; Herbert A Fritsche; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Leon W M M Terstappen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer: biologic staging beyond tumor burden.

Authors:  Massimo Cristofanilli; Kristine R Broglio; Valentina Guarneri; Summer Jackson; Herbert A Fritsche; Rabiul Islam; Shaheenah Dawood; James M Reuben; Shu-Wan Kau; Juanita M Lara; Saviti Krishnamurthy; Naoto T Ueno; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Vincente Valero
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Enumeration of circulating tumor cells in the blood of breast cancer patients after filtration enrichment: correlation with disease stage.

Authors:  Harriette J Kahn; Anthony Presta; Lu-Ying Yang; John Blondal; Maureen Trudeau; Lavina Lickley; Claire Holloway; David R McCready; Daniel Maclean; Alexander Marks
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Massimo Cristofanilli; G Thomas Budd; Matthew J Ellis; Alison Stopeck; Jeri Matera; M Craig Miller; James M Reuben; Gerald V Doyle; W Jeffrey Allard; Leon W M M Terstappen; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Membrane microfilter device for selective capture, electrolysis and genomic analysis of human circulating tumor cells.

Authors:  Siyang Zheng; Henry Lin; Jing-Quan Liu; Marija Balic; Ram Datar; Richard J Cote; Yu-Chong Tai
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 4.759

8.  Electromechanical transducer for rapid detection, discrimination and quantification of lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Waqas Ali; Fatemeh Jalvhei Moghaddam; Muhammad Usman Raza; Loan Bui; Bailey Sayles; Young-Tae Kim; Samir M Iqbal
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.874

9.  Lung cancer.

Authors:  W D Travis; L B Travis; S S Devesa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer-Is Not Worse Good Enough?

Authors:  Tarah J Ballinger; Mary Lou Smith; Kathy D Miller
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.