Focused ultrasound (FUS) for blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening is a safe, reversible and non-invasive strategy for targeted drug delivery to the brain, however extensive pre-planning strategies are necessary for successful FUS-mediated BBB opening through the structurally complex primate skull. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to demonstrate a pre-planning pipeline consisting of transcranial simulations and in vitro experimentation used to inform synchronous BBB opening and power cavitation imaging (PCI) with a single theranostic ultrasound (TUS) phased array. METHODS: Acoustic wave propagation simulation findings of pressure attenuation and focal shift through clinical-CT and micro-CT-based primate skull models were compared, while the latter were used to determine the impact of beam steering angle on focal shift and pressure attenuation. In vitro experimentation with a channel phantom enabled characterization of skull-induced receive focal shift (RFS), while in vivo BBB opening and PCI using in silico and in vitro pre-planning information was conducted using a custom Verasonics/MATLAB script. RESULTS: Simulations confirmed steering angle dependent transcranial focal shift and pressure attenuation, while in vitro experiments revealed minimal (0.30-1.50 mm) skull-induced RFS. In vivo rodent experiments with overlaid primate skull fragments demonstrated successful TUS-mediated BBB opening and spatially correlated power cavitation images (PCI) with regions of BBB opening on T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility for TUS-mediated BBB opening in vivo using in silico and in vitro pre-planning information. SIGNIFICANCE: TUS as an ultrasound-guided modality for BBB opening could serve as a promising alternative to current FUS-mediated BBB opening configurations in the clinic.
Focused ultrasound (FUS) for blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening is a safe, reversible and non-invasive strategy for targeted drug delivery to the brain, however extensive pre-planning strategies are necessary for successful FUS-mediated BBB opening through the structurally complex primate skull. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to demonstrate a pre-planning pipeline consisting of transcranial simulations and in vitro experimentation used to inform synchronous BBB opening and power cavitation imaging (PCI) with a single theranostic ultrasound (TUS) phased array. METHODS: Acoustic wave propagation simulation findings of pressure attenuation and focal shift through clinical-CT and micro-CT-based primate skull models were compared, while the latter were used to determine the impact of beam steering angle on focal shift and pressure attenuation. In vitro experimentation with a channel phantom enabled characterization of skull-induced receive focal shift (RFS), while in vivo BBB opening and PCI using in silico and in vitro pre-planning information was conducted using a custom Verasonics/MATLAB script. RESULTS: Simulations confirmed steering angle dependent transcranial focal shift and pressure attenuation, while in vitro experiments revealed minimal (0.30-1.50 mm) skull-induced RFS. In vivo rodent experiments with overlaid primate skull fragments demonstrated successful TUS-mediated BBB opening and spatially correlated power cavitation images (PCI) with regions of BBB opening on T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility for TUS-mediated BBB opening in vivo using in silico and in vitro pre-planning information. SIGNIFICANCE: TUS as an ultrasound-guided modality for BBB opening could serve as a promising alternative to current FUS-mediated BBB opening configurations in the clinic.
Authors: James J Choi; Robert C Carlisle; Christian Coviello; Len Seymour; Constantin-C Coussios Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Kevin J Haworth; Jason L Raymond; Kirthi Radhakrishnan; Melanie R Moody; Shao-Ling Huang; Tao Peng; Himanshu Shekhar; Melvin E Klegerman; Hyunggun Kim; David D McPherson; Christy K Holland Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Shih-Ying Wu; Mark T Burgess; Maria Eleni Karakatsani; Hermes A S Kamimura; Elisa E Konofagou Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Aparna Singh; Jiro Kusunose; M Anthony Phipps; Feng Wang; Li Min Chen; Charles F Caskey Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 4.996