Literature DB >> 25098262

Non-invasive and real-time passive acoustic mapping of ultrasound-mediated drug delivery.

James J Choi1, Robert C Carlisle, Christian Coviello, Len Seymour, Constantin-C Coussios.   

Abstract

New classes of biologically active materials, such as viruses, siRNA, antibodies and a wide range of engineered nanoparticles have emerged as potent agents for diagnosing and treating diseases, yet many of these agents fail because there is no effective route of delivery to their intended targets. Focused ultrasound and its ability to drive microbubble-seeded cavitation have been shown to facilitate drug delivery. However, cavitation is difficult to control temporally and spatially, making prediction of therapeutic outcomes deep in the body difficult. Here, we utilized passive acoustic mapping in vivo to understand how ultrasound parameters influence cavitation dynamics and to correlate spatial maps of cavitation to drug delivery. Focused ultrasound (center frequency: 0.5 MHz, peak-rarefactional pressure: 1.2 MPa, pulse length: 25 cycles or 50,000 cycles, pulse repetition interval: 0.02, 0.2, 1 or 3 s, number of pulses: 80 pulses) was applied to murine xenograft-model tumors in vivo during systemic injection of microbubbles with and without cavitation-sensitive liposomes or type 5 adenoviruses. Analysis of in vivo cavitation dynamics through several pulses revealed that cavitation was more efficiently produced at a lower pulse repetition frequency of 1 Hz than at 50 Hz. Within a pulse, inertial cavitation activity was shown to persist but reduced to 50% and 25% of its initial magnitude in 4.3 and 29.3 ms, respectively. Both through several pulses and within a pulse, the spatial distribution of cavitation was shown to change in time due to variations in microbubble distribution present in tumors. Finally, we demonstrated that the centroid of the mapped cavitation activity was within 1.33  ±  0.6 mm and 0.36 mm from the centroid location of drug release from liposomes and expression of the reporter gene encoded by the adenovirus, respectively. Thus passive acoustic mapping not only unraveled key mechanisms whereby a successful outcome is achieved, but also a predicted drug delivery outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25098262     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/17/4861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  28 in total

1.  Experimental demonstration of passive acoustic imaging in the human skull cavity using CT-based aberration corrections.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Advances in acoustic monitoring and control of focused ultrasound-mediated increases in blood-brain barrier permeability.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Frequency-sum beamforming for passive cavitation imaging.

Authors:  Shima H Abadi; Kevin J Haworth; Karla P Mercado-Shekhar; David R Dowling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Characterization of cavitation-radiated acoustic power using diffraction correction.

Authors:  Kyle T Rich; Christy K Holland; Marepalli B Rao; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Eli Vlaisavljevich; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Acoustic Droplet Vaporization in Acoustically Responsive Scaffolds: Effects of Frequency of Excitation, Volume Fraction and Threshold Determination Method.

Authors:  Mitra Aliabouzar; Xiaofang Lu; Oliver D Kripfgans; J Brian Fowlkes; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Post Hoc Analysis of Passive Cavitation Imaging for Classification of Histotripsy-Induced Liquefaction in Vitro.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Kevin J Haworth; Adam D Maxwell; Christy K Holland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Prolonging pulse duration in ultrasound-mediated gene delivery lowers acoustic pressure threshold for efficient gene transfer to cells and small animals.

Authors:  Dominic M Tran; James Harrang; Shuxian Song; Jeremy Chen; Bryn M Smith; Carol H Miao
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Quantitative Frequency-Domain Passive Cavitation Imaging.

Authors:  Kevin J Haworth; Kenneth B Bader; Kyle T Rich; Christy K Holland; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Power cavitation-guided blood-brain barrier opening with focused ultrasound and microbubbles.

Authors:  M T Burgess; I Apostolakis; E E Konofagou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.