Literature DB >> 34664192

Clinical, Immunological, and Molecular Variability of RAG Deficiency: A Retrospective Analysis of 22 RAG Patients.

Cristina Cifaldi1, Beatrice Rivalta2,3, Donato Amodio4, Algeri Mattia5, Lucia Pacillo2,3, Silvia Di Cesare2,3, Maria Chiriaco3, Giorgiana Madalina Ursu3, Nicola Cotugno3,4, Carmela Giancotta4, Emma C Manno4, Veronica Santilli4, Paola Zangari4, Galaverna Federica5, Giuseppe Palumbo3,5, Pietro Merli5, Paolo Palma3,4, Paolo Rossi2,3,4, Gigliola Di Matteo2,3, Franco Locatelli5,6, Andrea Finocchi2,3, Caterina Cancrini7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We described clinical, immunological, and molecular characterization within a cohort of 22 RAG patients focused on the possible correlation between clinical and genetic data.
METHODS: Immunological and genetic features were investigated by multiparametric flow cytometry and by Sanger or next generation sequencing (NGS) as appropriate.
RESULTS: Patients represented a broad spectrum of RAG deficiencies: SCID, OS, LS/AS, and CID. Three novel mutations in RAG1 gene and one in RAG2 were reported. The primary symptom at presentation was infections (81.8%). Infections and autoimmunity occurred together in the majority of cases (63.6%). Fifteen out of 22 (68.2%) patients presented autoimmune or inflammatory manifestations. Five patients experienced severe autoimmune cytopenia refractory to different lines of therapy. Total lymphocytes count was reduced or almost lacking in SCID group and higher in OS patients. B lymphocytes were variably detected in LS/AS and CID groups. Eighteen patients underwent HSCT permitting definitive control of autoimmune/hyperinflammatory manifestations in twelve of them (80%).
CONCLUSION: We reinforce the notion that different clinical phenotype can be found in patients with identical mutations even within the same family. Infections may influence genotype-phenotype correlation and function as trigger for immune dysregulation or autoimmune manifestations. Severe and early autoimmune refractory cytopenia is frequent and could be the first symptom of onset. Prompt recognition of RAG deficiency in patients with early onset of autoimmune/hyperinflammatory manifestations could contribute to the choice of a timely and specific treatment preventing the onset of other complications.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CID phenotypes; Cytopenia; Hypomorphic mutation; RAG deficiency; RAG1/RAG2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34664192      PMCID: PMC8821501          DOI: 10.1007/s10875-021-01130-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0271-9142            Impact factor:   8.317


Introduction

Systematic rearrangement of antigen receptor genes via V(D)J recombination is essential for maturation of progenitor lymphocytes, the genesis of immunoglobulin and T cell receptor (TCR), and production of a broad repertoire of antigen-specific T and B cells [1-6]. Complete RAGs deficiency has been known to cause severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) phenotype with lack of T and B cells (T-B-NK+ SCID) [7], life-threatening infections, and failure to thrive in early infancy. Today, RAGs diseases are associated to an expanding broad spectrum of phenotypes ranging from SCID, Omenn syndrome (OS) [8-13], “leaky” or “atypical” SCID, (LS/AS) whose peculiarities reside in varying numbers of oligoclonal T and B cells, and in some cases a predominance of γδ+ T cells (γδ AS) and autoimmune cytopenias [14]. Hypomorphic mutations allowing a residual RAG protein function may lead to a later onset of different diseases and a risk of delayed diagnosis. These forms can be characterized by diffuse granulomatous disease and/or autoimmunity (CID-G/AI) and an altered response to severe Herpesviridae infections (in particular EBV) [15-17]. Otherwise, common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), idiopathic CD4+ T cell lymphopenia (ICL) [18], IgA deficiency, and hyper-IgM syndrome have been also reported [19-21]. Although infections are the predominant presenting features in RAG deficiency patients, autoimmune manifestations including cytopenia, autoimmune hepatitis, myopathy, and nephrotic syndrome [17, 22, 23] should be considered associated manifestations. In addition, patients may develop inflammation and immune dysregulation symptoms as dermatitis or lymphoproliferation due to hyperinflammation and altered lymphocyte homeostasis [30]. This autoimmunity has been linked not only to checkpoint breaks in both T and B cell tolerance but also to other mechanisms which may play an additional role in sustaining autoimmune pathology [24]. Herein, we report the clinical and immunological phenotype together with molecular characterization of 22 RAG patients referred to our center presenting with a broad spectrum of symptoms including autoimmune and/or hyperinflammatory manifestations.

Methods

Patients

A total of 22 patients from 18 different families were assessed between 2009 and 2020 at the Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital. Patients were classified into four groups (SCID, OS, LS/AS, CID) based on clinical presentation, immunological data, on the criteria published by the Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (PIDTC) [25], ESID 2019 [26], and other groups [24, 27, 28]. SCID: at least one of: invasive bacterial, viral, or fungal/opportunistic infection; persistent diarrhoea and failure to thrive; affected family member AND manifestation in the first year of life AND two of 4 T cell criteria fulfilled: absence or very low number of T cells (CD3 T cells < 300/microliter), reduced naive CD4 and/or CD8 T cells; elevated γ/δ T cells; no or very low T cell function by response to mitogen or TCR stimulation; AND T cells maternal engraftment excluded AND HIV excluded. OS: Desquamating erythroderma in the first year of life AND one of the following: lymphoproliferation, hepatomegaly splenomegaly; failure to thrive; chronic diarrhea; recurrent pneumonia AND eosinophilia or elevated IgE AND T-cell deficiency (detectable CD3 T cells, ≥ 300/microliter, low naïve cells, reduced proliferation, oligoclonality) AND maternal engraftment excluded AND HIV excluded. LS/AS: Mutation in a SCID-causing gene AND Absence of characteristic SCID-associated infections (PCP, symptomatic CMV, persistent respiratory or gastrointestinal virus infection) in the first year of life AND does not fulfill criteria for Omenn syndrome. Reduced number of CD3 T cells (for age up to 2 years < 1000/microliter; for > 2 years up to 4 years < 800/microliter, for > 4 years < 600/microliter) AND Absence of maternal engraftment AND < 30% of lower limit of normal T cell function (as measured by response to PHA) AND Presence of activated, oligoclonal, and autologous T cells not associated with typical features of OS. Expansion of γδ T cells upon cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-driven lymphoproliferative disease and autoimmune cytopenia could be associated. CID: at least one of: severe infection (especially VZV, CMV, EBV, HPV, and molluscum); one manifestation of immune dysregulation (autoimmunity, IBD, severe eczema, lymphoproliferation, granuloma); malignancy AND age ≥ 2 years AND affected family member AND 2 of 4 T cell criteria fulfilled: reduced CD3 or CD4 or CD8 T cells (using age-related reference values); reduced naïve CD4 and/or CD8 T cells; elevated g/d T cells; reduced proliferation to mitogen or TCR stimulation. The clinical and immunological characterization is summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

Clinical features of RAG patients

ID/GenderFinal clinical diagnosisGene/mutationAge of manifestationAge at genetic diagnosisInfective complicationsAutoimmune complicationsOther autoimmune or hyperinflammatory complicationsAutoantibodyTreatmentLong-term follow-upRef.

PID-1

F

SCIDRAG25 months6 monthsLong lasting gastroenteritis (adenovirus)HSCTGood[50]

(a) c.1A > G; p.M1V

(b) c.1403_1406del; p.H468RfsTer16

PID-2

M

SCIDRAG12 months3 monthsChronic CMV, retinitis (CMV), bronchiolitis/pneumonia (respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus)HSCTGood[50]

(a1) c.1681C > T; p.R561C

(a2) c.1815G > C; p.M605I

(b) c.2780 T > C; p.F927S

PID-3

F

SCIDRAG16 months6 monthsPneumoniaHSCTGood[50]

(a) c.1229G > A; p.R410Q

(b) c.1863delG; p.A622QfsTer9

PID-4

M

SCIDRAG14 months7 monthsPneumonia, long-lasting diarrhea (rotavirus, adenovirus)HSCTGood[50]
(a) c.987delC; p.S330LfsTer15

PID-5

F

SCIDRAG13 months7,5 monthsOtitis (Pseudomonas aeruginosa), urinary infection, bronchiolitisDermatitisHSCTGood

(a) c.1228C > T; p.R410W

(b) c.2780 T > C; p.F927S

PID-6

F

SCIDRAG1BirthPrenatal diagnosisHSCTGood

(a) c.1871G > A; p.R624

(b) c.1213A > G; p.R405G

PID-7

F

SCIDRAG17 months7 monthsHSCTGood
(a) c.1361 T > A p. L454Q

PID-8

M

SCIDRAG125 days1 monthsChronic HHV6, long-lasting diarrhea (norovirus), pneumonia,Dermatitis, splenomegalyHSCTGood
(a) c. 1210 C > T; p.R404W

PID-9

M

OSRAG12 months4 monthsChronic CMVDermatitis (eritrodermia)HSCTGood[50]

(a) c.1682G > A; p.R561H

(b) c.1871G > A; p.R624H

PID-10

F

OSRAG12,5 months3 monthsPneumonia, sepsisDermatitis (eritrodermia)HSCTGood

(a) c.351delT; p.Phe118LeufsTer21

(b) c.1577 T > G; p.L526R

PID-11

M

OSRAG1Birth1 monthPneumocystosis, pneumonia (flavobacterium meningosepticum)ITPDermatitis (eritrodermia), tubule interstitial nephritisIVIG, steroids, HSCTGood[50]

(a) c.1870C > T; p.R624C

(b) c.2521C > T; p.R841W

PID-12

M

OSRAG25 months6 monthsPneumonia, sepsis, urinary tract infectionsDermatitis (eritrodermia), alopecia, splenomegalyHSCTGood

(a) c.281A > G; p.H94R

(b) c.1090_1093delAACA; p.N364VfsTer79

PID-13

M

OSRAG13 months4 monthsPurulent otitis, necrotizing fasciitis, cerebral abscess, sepsisDermatitis (eritrodermia)Passed away before HSCT for multiorgan failure
(a) c.519delT; p.E174Sfs*27

PID-14

F

OSRAG1BirthPrenatal diagnosisDermatitis (eritrodermia)HSCTGood

(a) c.1870C > T; p.R624C

(b) c.2521C > T; p.R841W

PID-15

M

ASRAG25 months6 monthsDermatitis, lymphadenopathyHSCT[50]
(a) c.685C > T; p.R229W

PID-16

M

ASRAG18 months1,2 yearsLong-lasting diarrhea (adenovirus)Dermatitis (eritrodermia), tubulointerstitial nephritisHSCTGood[50]
(a) c.2521C > T; p.R841W

PID-17

M

ASRAG19,2 months1,1 yearsChronic CMV, pneumonia, sepsis (P. aeruginosa), BCG infectionMiller-Fisher syndrome (CMV-related), AIHACoombs, antiplatelets Ab, INFα Ab, INFω AbIVIG, steroid, rituximab, plasmapheresis, HSCTGood[27]
(a) c.256_257del; p.K86VfsTer33

PID-18

F

ASRAG11,8 years1,9 yearsChronic CMV, long lasting gastroenteritis (adenovirus)HSCTGood
(a) c.1767C > G; p.Y589X

PID-19

F

CIDRAG13 years3,4 yearsChronic HHV-6, CMV, EBV, neutropenia, pneumoniaAIHACoombsIVIG, steroid, rituximab, HSCTPassed away before for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis[50]

(a) c. 1871G > A; p.R624H

(b) c.1213A > G; p.R405G

PID-20

M

CIDRAG11 years2 yearsChronic CMV, EBV, long-lasting diarrhea (rotavirus), pneumonia (haemophilus influenzae, bocavirus), sepsisITP, AIHASplenomegalyANA Ab, antiphospholipid Ab, antiplatelets Ab, coombsIVIG, steroid, rituximab, plasmapheresisPassed away before HSCT for multiorgan failure[50]
(a) c.2521C > T; p.R841W

PID-21

M

CIDRAG16 years11 yearsChronic EBV, severe chicken POX, pneumoniaGood[39]

(a) c.1871G > A; p.R624H

(b) c.2182 T > C; p.Y728H

PID-22

F

CIDRAG13 years10 yearsOtitis, pneumonia, chronic HHV6AIHA, autoimmune thyroiditisVitiligoCoombs, thyroglobulin abIVIG, steroid, rituximab, mycophenolic acid, rapamycinStill admitted in severe clinical state

(a) c.2095C > T; p.R699W

(b) c.2408A > G; p.N803S

SCID severe combined immunodeficiency, OS Omenn syndrome, AS atypical SCID, LS Leaky/SCID, CID combined immunodeficiency, EBV Epstein-Barr virus, CMV cytomegalovirus, HHV-6 human herpesvirus 6, AIHA autoimmune hemolytic anemia, ITP immune thrombocytopenia, IFN interferon, ANA antinuclear antibody, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Table 2

Immune phenotype of RAG cohort

ID/diseaseEosinophils(cells/uL)Lymphocytes(cells/uL)CD3 + (%)CD3 +(cells/uL)CD4 + (%)CD4 +(cells/uL)CD8 + (%)CD8 +(cells/uL)CD19 + (%)CD19 +(cells/uL)CD16 + CD56 + (%)CD16 + CD56 +(cells/uL)

PID-1

SCID

350580846.41.58.76.135.30.31.7491527.8

PID-2

SCID

202900.20.580.10.290.10.290.10.2996.4279.5

PID-3

SCID

3022014.531.910.823.763.78.140081.8179.9

PID-4

SCID

30350n.an.an.an.an.an.an.an.an.an.a

PID-5

SCID

367014008.1113.45.982.62.230.80.1442.0287.11219.4

PID-6

SCID

1305602.413.441.47.840.63.363.419.0493.3522.4

PID-7

SCID

77031064198.428.788.9719.259.520032.4100.4

PID-8

SCID

200129232.1414.738.9114.920.8268.70066.9864.3

PID-9

OS

790012.17069.88494.638.94734.130.937610028.63480.6

PID-10

OS

54010.830919855.3101083778339004433.2

PID-11

OS

5700312064.72018.6341060.826.3820.50.26.2432.61017.1

PID-12

OS

591028008423528222963841282.7476.72

PID-13

OS

185083080.5668.1571.6594.284.436.520.64.9816.3135.29

PID-14

OS

7420280088.92489.282.82318.46.1170.80.25.610.1282.8

PID-15

LS/AS

38027054.4146.849.9134.74.712.60042.8115.5

PID-16

LS/AS

15055050.1275.5511.663.81.16.056.435.235.2193.6

PID-17

LS/AS

40276050.21385.52.877.232.3891.437.9104610.4287.0

PID-18

LS/AS

30450n.an.an.an.an.an.an.an.an.an.a

PID-19

CID

0195058.51140.7528.3551.818.4358.81.835.139.1762.4

PID-20

CID

50242011266.210.1244.40.512.127.3661521258.4

PID-21

CID

13088075.4663.544.9395.120.4179.50.87.0421.9192.7

PID-22

CID

72150048.472631.7475.513.420121.7325.527.8417

PID-4 and PID-18 no immune phenotype data available

PID-5 and PID-8 maternal engraftment

*On IVIG

Pre IVIG IgG value of PID-14

**Maternal origin

n.a. Not available

Clinical features of RAG patients PID-1 F (a) c.1A > G; p.M1V (b) c.1403_1406del; p.H468RfsTer16 PID-2 M (a1) c.1681C > T; p.R561C (a2) c.1815G > C; p.M605I (b) c.2780 T > C; p.F927S PID-3 F (a) c.1229G > A; p.R410Q (b) c.1863delG; p.A622QfsTer9 PID-4 M PID-5 F (a) c.1228C > T; p.R410W (b) c.2780 T > C; p.F927S PID-6 F (a) c.1871G > A; p.R624 (b) c.1213A > G; p.R405G PID-7 F PID-8 M PID-9 M (a) c.1682G > A; p.R561H (b) c.1871G > A; p.R624H PID-10 F (a) c.351delT; p.Phe118LeufsTer21 (b) c.1577 T > G; p.L526R PID-11 M (a) c.1870C > T; p.R624C (b) c.2521C > T; p.R841W PID-12 M (a) c.281A > G; p.H94R (b) c.1090_1093delAACA; p.N364VfsTer79 PID-13 M PID-14 F (a) c.1870C > T; p.R624C (b) c.2521C > T; p.R841W PID-15 M PID-16 M PID-17 M PID-18 F PID-19 F (a) c. 1871G > A; p.R624H (b) c.1213A > G; p.R405G PID-20 M PID-21 M (a) c.1871G > A; p.R624H (b) c.2182 T > C; p.Y728H PID-22 F (a) c.2095C > T; p.R699W (b) c.2408A > G; p.N803S SCID severe combined immunodeficiency, OS Omenn syndrome, AS atypical SCID, LS Leaky/SCID, CID combined immunodeficiency, EBV Epstein-Barr virus, CMV cytomegalovirus, HHV-6 human herpesvirus 6, AIHA autoimmune hemolytic anemia, ITP immune thrombocytopenia, IFN interferon, ANA antinuclear antibody, HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Immune phenotype of RAG cohort PID-1 SCID PID-2 SCID PID-3 SCID PID-4 SCID PID-5 SCID PID-6 SCID PID-7 SCID PID-8 SCID PID-9 OS PID-10 OS PID-11 OS PID-12 OS PID-13 OS PID-14 OS PID-15 LS/AS PID-16 LS/AS PID-17 LS/AS PID-18 LS/AS PID-19 CID PID-20 CID PID-21 CID PID-22 CID PID-1 SCID PID-2 SCID PID-3 SCID PID-4 SCID PID-5 SCID PID-6 SCID PID-7 SCID PID-8 SCID PID-9 OS PID-10 OS PID-11 OS PID-12 OS PID-13 OS PID-14 OS PID-15 LS/AS PID-16 LS/AS PID-17 LS/AS PID-18 LS/AS PID-19 CID PID-20 CID PID-21 CID PID-22 CID PID-4 and PID-18 no immune phenotype data available PID-5 and PID-8 maternal engraftment *On IVIG Pre IVIG IgG value of PID-14 **Maternal origin n.a. Not available Two patients (PID-17 and PID-21) have been enrolled in the Profound CID study (pCID) (DRKS00000497), fulfilling the study inclusion criteria.

Multiparametric Flow Cytometric Analysis

All flow cytometric analyses were performed on ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) blood samples within 24 h of venipuncture. After red blood cell lysis with ammonium chloride, the lymphocytes were incubated with the appropriate antibody cocktail for 30 min at 4 °C, washed with PBS, and suspended in PBS. At least 50,000 events in the lymphocyte live gate were acquired for each sample. Samples were acquired on FACSCANTO II (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc, version 8.8.6, Ashland, Ore).

Genetic Analysis

Ion Torrent Gene Target Library Preparation and NGS Sequencing were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Next generation sequencing (Ion Torrent) and sequencing: genomic DNA is isolated from peripheral blood of patients using standard protocols (QIAamp DNA Blood kit by QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany). PCR reactions were carried out using GoTaq DNA polymerase by standard methods (Promega, Madison, WI). Direct sequencing was performed using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and analyzed on an ABI PRISM 3130 and 310 automated sequencers (Applied Biosystems). Sanger sequencing for all mutations and parents’ carrier status was performed.

Ion Torrent Bioinformatics Analysis

Mapping and variant calling were performed using the Ion Torrent suite software v3.6. Sequencing reads were aligned against the USC hg19 reference genome using the program distributed within the Torrent mapping Alignment Program (TMAP) map4 algorithm (Thermo Fisher; https://github.com/iontorrent/TS). The aligned reads were processed for variant calling by using the Torrent Suite Variant Caller TVC program; variants found in Variant Calling Format (VCF) file were annotated using ANNOVAR. The called variants with minimum coverage of ×20, standard Mapping Quality, and Base Phred Quality were examined on Integrative Genome Viewer (IGV) and BIOMART. After applying filtering criteria, all nonsense, frameshift, and canonical splice site variants were evaluated to determine their potential pathogenicity.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed with Graph Pad Prism, version 6.2 (Graph Pad Software, La Jolla, CA). p < 0.05 and **p < 0.005 were considered significant.

Results

Clinical Phenotype and Genetic Characterization of RAG Cohort

We report clinical, immunological, and molecular characterization within a cohort of 22 RAG patients diagnosed between 2009 and 2020. The cohort characteristics are described in Table 1. The majority of patients (8 cases, 36.4%) were affected by SCID presenting with T-B-NK+ phenotype except for two patients with T+B-NK+ phenotype in which maternal T engraftment was observed (PID-5 and PID-8), followed by OS (6 cases, 27.2%), LS/AS (4 cases, 18.2%), and CID (4 cases, 18.2%) (Fig. 1A, Tables 1 and 2). The age at presentation ranged from birth to 72 months, with a median of 5 months (range birth to 6 years), whereas the median age of genetic diagnosis was 6 months (range birth to 11 years).
Fig. 1

a RAG cohort. Clinical diagnosis of RAG patients for the four main categories (n = 22). b Difference in timing for first symptom of immunodeficiency and genetic diagnosis of four RAG groups. Symbols represent individual patients. c Infections, autoimmunity, and immune dysregulation in RAG cohort (number of total cases). Inf, infection; ID, immune dysregulation; AI, autoimmune manifestation. d Clinical manifestations in RAG cohort distributed among the four groups (frequency as % total cases). Other: Miller-Fisher syndrome, tubulointerstitial nephritis, alopecia, vitiligo. PID-6 prenatal diagnosis. PID-7 No available data during first months of life

a RAG cohort. Clinical diagnosis of RAG patients for the four main categories (n = 22). b Difference in timing for first symptom of immunodeficiency and genetic diagnosis of four RAG groups. Symbols represent individual patients. c Infections, autoimmunity, and immune dysregulation in RAG cohort (number of total cases). Inf, infection; ID, immune dysregulation; AI, autoimmune manifestation. d Clinical manifestations in RAG cohort distributed among the four groups (frequency as % total cases). Other: Miller-Fisher syndrome, tubulointerstitial nephritis, alopecia, vitiligo. PID-6 prenatal diagnosis. PID-7 No available data during first months of life In particular, the mean age of first symptom was 3.4 months (± 0.25 sd) and confirming genetic diagnosis 4.6 months (± 0.29 sd) for SCID, 2 months (± 0.19 sd) and 3 months (± 0.21 sd) for OS, 1 year (± 0.55 sd) and 1.2 years (± 0.53 sd) for LS/AS, and 3.2 years (± 2.06 sd) and 6.7 years (± 4.7 sd) for CID (Fig. 1B). The number of RAG diagnoses following NGS application changed from a median of 1.5 up to 2.6 per year (Fig. 1C). Noteworthy, there was no significant difference between patients with SCID and OS when comparing age at first clinical symptoms and at diagnosis (Fig. 1B). The median age of the first symptom and the genetic diagnosis were markedly lower in SCID and OS than in LS/AS and mostly in CID patients (Fig. 1B). The symptom at presentation was infection (n = 18; 81.8%). Dermatitis represented the onset manifestation in all OS, two LS/AS (PID-15, PID-16) and two SCID patients (PID-5, PID-8). On the other hand, infections, autoimmunity, and immune dysregulation occurred together in most cases (n = 12; 54.5%). Two SCID and one OS early diagnosed due to prenatal diagnosis or strongly suggestive phenotype were promptly transplanted and did not present any severe manifestation (Fig. 1D). Chronic viremia was common among the cohort (SCID n = 4; OS n = 1; LS/As n = 3; CID n = 4), whereas respiratory and gastrointestinal infections were prevalent in SCID patients (Fig. 1E). Interestingly, 15 out of 22 (68.2%) patients presented autoimmune and/or hyperinflammatory manifestations (Fig. 1D). The most frequent was dermatitis occurring in 9 patients (40.9%). Lymphoproliferation and splenomegaly were present in 4 patients (18.1%). Nephropathy occurred in 2 patients (PID-14 and PID-16). whereas one patient developed Miller Fisher syndrome (PID-17) (Fig. S2, and Table 1). Notably, one OS, one LS/AS, and 3 CID patients (PID-12, PID-13, PID-17, PID-20, PID-10) with autoimmune/inflammatory complications experienced a severe autoimmune cytopenia (AIC) (Fig. 2A) with a median age at onset of 1 year (range 1–9) (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2

a Occurrence of autoimmune cytopenia in each RAG group. b Onset of AIC manifestation for PID-11,17,19,20,22. Autoimmune cytopenia (AIC), autoimmune neutropenia (AN), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). c Number of RAG diagnosis from 2009 to 2020. Pink background indicates the application of NGS. c Occurrence of HSCT in our RAG cohort. For each category, the total number of patients is indicated. d Occurrence of HSCT in patients with (AI + n = 12) or without (AI − n = 6) autoimmunity (frequency as % annotated total cases. n = 18) and age of HSCT

a Occurrence of autoimmune cytopenia in each RAG group. b Onset of AIC manifestation for PID-11,17,19,20,22. Autoimmune cytopenia (AIC), autoimmune neutropenia (AN), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). c Number of RAG diagnosis from 2009 to 2020. Pink background indicates the application of NGS. c Occurrence of HSCT in our RAG cohort. For each category, the total number of patients is indicated. d Occurrence of HSCT in patients with (AI + n = 12) or without (AI − n = 6) autoimmunity (frequency as % annotated total cases. n = 18) and age of HSCT RAG1 mutations were detected in nineteen (86.4%) patients, while RAG2 mutations in three (13.6%) of them (Table S1). Consanguinity was documented in 9 out of 20 families (45%), in which we found homozygous mutations. We found three novel mutations in RAG1 gene (p.S330LfsTer15, p.R404W, and p.N803S) and two in RAG2 (p.H94R and p.N364VfsTer79). Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion (CADD) scores have been used to define the degree of pathogenicity of novel mutations (Table S1).

Immunological Phenotypes

As expected, increased IgE levels were observed in OS group. IgA and IgM resulted very low or undetectable in SCID and OS patients, whereas detected serum IgG in two SCID and three OS reflected maternal trans-placental transfer. Leaky/atypical SCID and CID patients showed normal immunoglobulin values except for one patient with LS/AS, PID-17, who manifested hypergammaglobulinemia (Fig. S1A and Table 2). Total lymphocyte counts were severely reduced or almost lacking in SCID group (Table 2). T cells were particularly low in SCID group, whereas CD3, CD4, and CD8 cell count were higher in OS patients. LS/AS and CID patients presented detectable T cells, albeit reduced proportion of naïve T cells (Fig. S1B-C). Expansion of T-cell receptor γδ was documented in two LS/AS patients (PID-16 and PID-17) (Fig. S1D), particularly following disseminated CMV infection as for PID-17. Circulating B cells were variably detected in AS and CID groups and were nearly absent as expected in SCID and OS patients correlating to their immunoglobulin levels. NK cells were present in all groups with normal or increased numbers (Fig. S1B).

Outcomes and Treatment

All patients with AIC received high dose of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and steroids as first-line therapy with limited response. No complete remission was observed in any patients despite second-line therapies with Rituximab (PID-12, PID-17, PID-20), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (PID-20), rapamycin (PID-22), or third-line therapies with plasmapheresis (PID-17, PID-20). Eighteen out of 22 patients underwent allogenic HSCT with a median of 7 months (range 3–36.7) (Fig. 2C). Donors were either matched unrelated (2 cases, with one cord blood and one bone marrow as stem cell source), HLA-phenotypically identical (2 cases transplanted from the mother), or HLA-haploidentical (14 patients). Conditioning regimen was based on Treosulfan 42 gr/m2, fludarabine 160 mg/m2, and ATLG, with 6 patients receiving additional tiotepa 10 mg/kg. Neutrophils and platelets engraftment were achieved in 16 out of 18 patients after a median time of 15 days and 11 days, respectively. Two patients experienced primary graft failure and were rescued with an allograft from the other HLA-haploidentical parent. Cumulative incidence of grades I–II acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) was 17% (95% CI) with 3 patients experiencing mild, skin-only aGvHD. No cases of grades III–IV aGvHD were observed, and no patient experienced chronic GvHD. Infectious complications were frequent after HSCT, accounting for almost 90% of patients, and included blood stream infections (5 patients), viral reactivations (CMV, HHV6, and Adenovirus in 6, 2, and 4 patients, respectively), infectious enteritis (Rotavirus 1, Norovirus 1, and C. difficile 1 case), and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (PID-19). With a median follow-up of 61 months (range 17–138) overall survival of transplanted patients was 94% (95% CI). One patient died of massive pulmonary hemorrhage caused by invasive aspergillosis which was already present at the time of HSCT. Noteworthy, two additional patients of our cohort died before HSCT due to multiorgan failure. Notably, all patients reached normal immunoglobulin levels. Among fifteen patients with autoimmune/hyperinflammatory manifestations, HSCT was required for definitive management in twelve patients (80%). Patients with immune dysregulation underwent HSCT at an older age compared to those without immune dysregulation (median 12.7 vs. 7.4 years) partially due to the diagnostic delay (Fig. 2D). Two patients resolved treatment-refractory AIC, thanks to HSCT.

Discussion

During an 11-year period, we diagnosed 22 RAG patients at the Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital. The patients were classified as SCID, OS, LS/AS, and CID, confirming that different clinical phenotypes can be found in patients with identical mutations even within the same family. We recorded an increased number of RAG diagnosis following NGS application from a median of 1.5 up to 2.6 per year. This was particular evident in the first year of NGS application, in which we unmasked previous undiagnosed cases. This increased frequency is consistent with recent reports, including newborn screening that confirm RAG1/2 as the second most prevalent genes associated with SCID and the most common genes associated with leaky SCID/CID [29]. In addition, we observed a median delay of 75 days between clinical onset and genetic diagnosis for SCID, 1 month for OS, 14 months for LS/AS, and 3 years for CID patients. As reported in other studies [22], the CID diagnostic delay reflects a lack of recognition of hypomorphic RAG mutations associated with milder and late onset phenotype in contrast to the severe SCID phenotype caused by null RAG mutations. These data confirmed a higher frequency of RAG defects that should be promptly suspected and recognized to avoid severe complications. As reported [30, 31], the immunological phenotype in our cohort confirmed the reduction of the T cell count and the diminished proportion of peripheral naive CD4 T cells in each group. Thus, a detailed immunophenotype could help in suspecting RAG deficiency in those patients with immune dysregulation. RAG1 mutations have been reported more frequently than RAG2 [31, 32] as occurred in our cohort. Interestingly, we found three novel mutations in the RAG1 gene and two in RAG2. Based on previously reported literature [33-35] that showed a significantly lower activity level of missense mutations in the nonamer-binding region (NBR) that is part of the catalytic core, we can assume that the p.R404W could explain the SCID phenotype observed in PID-8. Similarly, the p.S330LfsTer15 mutation is found in PID-4 falls in the RING domain of RAG1, determining the absence of recombination activity by affecting protein subcellular localization or decreasing chromatin accessibility of the RAG complex [34, 35]; however, in this patient, the resulting truncated protein is the most evident cause of SCID phenotype. Moreover, the C-terminus of RAG1 protein has been identified primarily in patients with CID showing significant residual VDJ recombination activity [6]. These data perfectly reflect the p.N803S mutation carried by PID-22 characterized by a CID phenotype, although the recombination activity of this novel mutation was not yet determined. Finally, PID-12 carried the two novel p.H94R and p.N364VfsTer79 mutations, both in the extended catalytic core of the RAG2 protein that may affect its activity leading to an OS phenotype [36]. Also in this case, the p.N364VfsTer79 mutation causing an evident defective protein can more heavily affect the RAG2 function. Differently from other studies focused on populations with a high rate of consanguinity [37, 38], many patients enrolled in this work had non-consanguineous parents (59%), suggesting a high mutation rate in these genes as well as a large occurrence of heterozygous carriers. Interestingly, although individuals with RAG heterozygous missense mutations were not reported to be typically associated to a RAG phenotype, we observed three CID patients presenting with autoimmune cytopenia and carrying only a single missense heterozygous mutation in RAG genes (data not shown). These data suggest that other factors, not yet fully understood, could influence the disease expression. PID-16 and PID-20, defined as LS/AS and CID, respectively, carried the same homozygous mutations (p.R841W), with severe autoimmune manifestations: the second one, despite having received a timely diagnosis, died before being able to undergo HSCT. Similarly, two compound heterozygous siblings (PID-6 and PID-19) (p.R405G and p.R624H) were diagnosed as SCID and CID, respectively. The older sister (PID-19) diagnosed at 3 years of life died of invasive aspergillosis already present at time of HSCT. The younger sister (PID-6) who received at birth a more severe diagnosis of SCID underwent HSCT at 3 months of life showing a different clinical outcome, thanks also to a prenatal diagnosis. This underlines the importance of other epigenetic or environmental factors on disease course and how a prompt HSCT may be crucial. Furthermore, four compound heterozygous RAG1 patients, classified as SCID (PID-6), OS (PID-9), and CID (PID-19, PID-21), shared the same p.R624H mutation, with almost absent recombination activity, in combination with the p.R405G, p.Y728H, and p.R561H respectively. The p.Y728H showed a markedly decreased but detectable recombination activity in line with his milder phenotype [39], whereas p.R561H showed nearly absent activity (2.0 ± 0.6) reflecting the OS disease. Unfortunately, the p.R405G recombination activity was not still determined. Otherwise, the two compound heterozygous brothers (PID-11 and PID-14) with the p.R624C and the p.R841W mutations presented with the same OS disease. Thus, genotype–phenotype correlation in RAG deficiency is not absolute. Indeed, other factors such as chronic and uncontrolled infections may influence the outcome of the disease besides the level of recombination activity determining a variable clinical phenotype even within the same family. CMV, EBV, and HHV-6 viral infections probably affected the clinical course and the onset of complications in PID-19. On the contrary, we cannot know what the clinical course would have been in PID-6 if she had encountered a virus before HSCT. Indeed, chronic, uncontrolled Herpesviridae viremia was frequent among CID group (75%). Usually, CID patients develop more severe manifestations often triggered by viral infections that closely preceded the onset of autoimmunity as in our patient PID-17 [40]. Nonetheless, the presence of residual B cells in CID patients makes them prone to EBV replication with higher risk of EBV-driven lymphoproliferation suggesting the need of a closer viral and radiological monitoring [41, 42]. PID-21 was initially classified as a humoral defect and only later reconsidered as CID at 11 years of age. Thus, considering the high frequency of hypomorphic mutations with a milder phenotype, a longitudinal re-evaluation of patients lacking a molecular diagnosis is always recommended, and RAG deficiency should also be suspected in patients where B cell defect is predominant. As rarely reported for other patients with CID phenotype [43], this patient did not undergo HSCT considering his good clinical status and the unsuccessful research for a suitable identical HSCT donor. He presented recurrent low respiratory infections well controlled by antibiotic prophylaxis (azithromycin) and immunoglobulin replacement therapy. This case underlines how the molecular definition could support pediatricians and immunologists in achieving better follow-up but open crucial questions on therapeutical options. Thus, a close follow-up in large multicentric international cohorts is mandatory to deepening the knowledge and understanding of these patients’ natural history. In line with other reports [22, 32], our data showed that severe immune dysregulation manifestations (68.2%) are a common feature of RAG deficiency often refractory to conventional medical management. In particular, dermatitis and autoimmune refractory cytopenia resulted in the most frequent manifestations. Otherwise, nephritis [22, 32], or neurological involvement (Miller-Fisher syndrome) could represent the first or the main symptom of onset [30], which can lead patients to the attention of other specialist delaying the correct diagnosis. The early recognition of these manifestations could contribute to the choice of a prompt specific treatment and prevent the onset of others complications [43, 44]. According to the literature [22], given the refractory nature of autoimmune cytopenia, it is essential to rapidly proceed to transplant patients with AIC to avoid complications or chronic infections that can be responsible for the onset of comorbidities compromising the outcome of HSCT. HLA-identical donor transplant demonstrates an excellent overall survival greater than 75% [45, 46]. Moreover, innovative HSCT approaches have shown encouraging results in case when an HLA-matched donor is not available [47, 48]. Finally, immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory drugs should be strongly considered to control immunodysregulation in these patients.

Conclusions

RAG deficiency still presents a challenge in tracing effective management and follow-up, considering the inability to predict the disease course in atypical cases. This study describes the clinical, immunological, and molecular characteristics of 22 RAG patients providing five novel mutations. This cohort highlighted the heterogeneity of manifestations associated with inborn error of immunity particularly for patients with hypomorphic mutations and milder phenotypes. In this regard, extending RAG analysis to older pediatric and adult patients affected by undefined CVID and/or immune dysregulation [42] might be helpful in discovering novel cases and expanding the current knowledge of natural history of RAG deficiency. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb) Supplementary file2 (DOCX 32.2 kb) Panel a Immunoglobulin titers of each RAG group. Grey background indicates normal serum Ig values of normal donors. IgG. IgM. IgA normal donors ranges from [49] and IgE from Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital. Panel b Immunophenotype shows absolute count of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T cell, CD19+ B cells and NK cells among groups. Panel c CD4+ CD45RA+ and CD4+CD45RO+ T-cell subsets, shown in LS/AS and CID. Panel d Percentage of TCRαβ and γδ T cells of LS/AS and CID. **P < 0.005. Shown are mean values ± SEM (PNG 509 kb) High Resolution Image (TIF 1934 kb) Panel a Abdominal CT scan and ultrasound showed hepatosplenomegaly in two CID patients. Panel b PID-17 magnetic resonance images showed marked thickening. impregnation of the roots of the cauda (left) and cranial nerves (right) reflecting a clinical picture of Miller Fisher’s Syndrome characterized by severe axial hypotonus. ophthalmoparesis. ataxia. generalized areflexia. progressive paralysis of cranial nerves. (PNG 619 kb) High Resolution Image (TIF 2525 kb)
  13 in total

Review 1.  RAG gene defects at the verge of immunodeficiency and immune dysregulation.

Authors:  Anna Villa; Luigi D Notarangelo
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 12.988

2.  Outcomes and Treatment Strategies for Autoimmunity and Hyperinflammation in Patients with RAG Deficiency.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Farmer; Zsofia Foldvari; Boglarka Ujhazi; Suk See De Ravin; Karin Chen; Jack J H Bleesing; Catharina Schuetz; Waleed Al-Herz; Roshini S Abraham; Avni Y Joshi; Beatriz T Costa-Carvalho; David Buchbinder; Claire Booth; Andreas Reiff; Polly J Ferguson; Asghar Aghamohammadi; Hassan Abolhassani; Jennifer M Puck; Mehdi Adeli; Caterina Cancrini; Paolo Palma; Alice Bertaina; Franco Locatelli; Gigliola Di Matteo; Raif S Geha; Maria G Kanariou; Lilia Lycopoulou; Marianna Tzanoudaki; John W Sleasman; Suhag Parikh; Gloria Pinero; Bernard M Fischer; Ghassan Dbaibo; Ekrem Unal; Turkan Patiroglu; Musa Karakukcu; Khulood Khalifa Al-Saad; Meredith A Dilley; Sung-Yun Pai; Cullen M Dutmer; Erwin W Gelfand; Christoph B Geier; Martha M Eibl; Hermann M Wolf; Lauren A Henderson; Melissa M Hazen; Carmem Bonfim; Beata Wolska-Kuśnierz; Manish J Butte; Joseph D Hernandez; Sarah K Nicholas; Polina Stepensky; Shanmuganathan Chandrakasan; Maurizio Miano; Emma Westermann-Clark; Vera Goda; Gergely Kriván; Steven M Holland; Olajumoke Fadugba; Sarah E Henrickson; Ahmet Ozen; Elif Karakoc-Aydiner; Safa Baris; Ayca Kiykim; Robbert Bredius; Birgit Hoeger; Kaan Boztug; Olga Pashchenko; Benedicte Neven; Despina Moshous; Jean-Pierre de Villartay; Ahmed Aziz Bousfiha; Harry R Hill; Luigi D Notarangelo; Jolan E Walter
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2019-03-12

3.  Establishing diagnostic criteria for severe combined immunodeficiency disease (SCID), leaky SCID, and Omenn syndrome: the Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium experience.

Authors:  William T Shearer; Elizabeth Dunn; Luigi D Notarangelo; Christopher C Dvorak; Jennifer M Puck; Brent R Logan; Linda M Griffith; Donald B Kohn; Richard J O'Reilly; Thomas A Fleisher; Sung-Yun Pai; Caridad A Martinez; Rebecca H Buckley; Morton J Cowan
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 4.  Human RAG mutations: biochemistry and clinical implications.

Authors:  Luigi D Notarangelo; Min-Sung Kim; Jolan E Walter; Yu Nee Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 53.106

5.  A Large Cohort of RAG1/2-Deficient SCID Patients-Clinical, Immunological, and Prognostic Analysis.

Authors:  Noa Greenberg-Kushnir; Yu Nee Lee; Amos J Simon; Atar Lev; Nufar Marcus; Omar Abuzaitoun; Raz Somech; Tali Stauber
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 8.317

6.  Phenotypical heterogeneity in RAG-deficient patients from a highly consanguineous population.

Authors:  S S Meshaal; R E El Hawary; D S Abd Elaziz; A Eldash; R Alkady; S Lotfy; A A Mauracher; L Opitz; J Pachlopnik Schmid; M van der Burg; J Chou; N M Galal; J A Boutros; R Geha; A M Elmarsafy
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Agammaglobulinemia associated to nasal polyposis due to a hypomorphic RAG1 mutation in a 12 years old boy.

Authors:  Cristina Cifaldi; Alessia Scarselli; Davide Petricone; Silvia Di Cesare; Maria Chiriaco; Alessia Claps; Paolo Rossi; Enrica Calzoni; Yasuhiro Yamazaki; Luigi Daniele Notarangelo; Gigliola Di Matteo; Caterina Cancrini; Andrea Finocchi
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  A novel immunodeficiency associated with hypomorphic RAG1 mutations and CMV infection.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre de Villartay; Annick Lim; Hamoud Al-Mousa; Sophie Dupont; Julie Déchanet-Merville; Edith Coumau-Gatbois; Marie-Lise Gougeon; Arnaud Lemainque; Céline Eidenschenk; Emmanuelle Jouanguy; Laurent Abel; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Alain Fischer; Françoise Le Deist
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  A systematic analysis of recombination activity and genotype-phenotype correlation in human recombination-activating gene 1 deficiency.

Authors:  Yu Nee Lee; Francesco Frugoni; Kerry Dobbs; Jolan E Walter; Silvia Giliani; Andrew R Gennery; Waleed Al-Herz; Elie Haddad; Francoise LeDeist; Jack H Bleesing; Lauren A Henderson; Sung-Yun Pai; Robert P Nelson; Dalia H El-Ghoneimy; Reem A El-Feky; Shereen M Reda; Elham Hossny; Pere Soler-Palacin; Ramsay L Fuleihan; Niraj C Patel; Michel J Massaad; Raif S Geha; Jennifer M Puck; Paolo Palma; Caterina Cancrini; Karin Chen; Mauno Vihinen; Frederick W Alt; Luigi D Notarangelo
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  The Clinical and Genetic Spectrum of 82 Patients With RAG Deficiency Including a c.256_257delAA Founder Variant in Slavic Countries.

Authors:  Svetlana O Sharapova; Małgorzata Skomska-Pawliszak; Yulia A Rodina; Beata Wolska-Kuśnierz; Nel Dabrowska-Leonik; Bozena Mikołuć; Olga E Pashchenko; Srdjan Pasic; Tomáš Freiberger; Tomáš Milota; Renata Formánková; Anna Szaflarska; Maciej Siedlar; Tadej Avčin; Gašper Markelj; Peter Ciznar; Krzysztof Kalwak; Sylwia Kołtan; Teresa Jackowska; Katarzyna Drabko; Alenka Gagro; Małgorzata Pac; Elissaveta Naumova; Snezhina Kandilarova; Katarzyna Babol-Pokora; Dzmitry S Varabyou; Barbara H Barendregt; Elena V Raykina; Tatiana V Varlamova; Anna V Pavlova; Hana Grombirikova; Maruša Debeljak; Irina V Mersiyanova; Anastasiia V Bondarenko; Liudmyla I Chernyshova; Larysa V Kostyuchenko; Marina N Guseva; Jelena Rascon; Audrone Muleviciene; Egle Preiksaitiene; Christoph B Geier; Alexander Leiss-Piller; Yasuhiro Yamazaki; Tomoki Kawai; Jolan E Walter; Irina V Kondratenko; Anna Šedivá; Mirjam van der Burg; Natalia B Kuzmenko; Luigi D Notarangelo; Ewa Bernatowska; Olga V Aleinikova
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Targeted treatment of autoimmune cytopenias in primary immunodeficiencies.

Authors:  Lucia Pacillo; Giuliana Giardino; Donato Amodio; Carmela Giancotta; Beatrice Rivalta; Gioacchino Andrea Rotulo; Emma Concetta Manno; Cristina Cifaldi; Giuseppe Palumbo; Claudio Pignata; Paolo Palma; Paolo Rossi; Andrea Finocchi; Caterina Cancrini
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 2.  Understanding inborn errors of immunity: A lens into the pathophysiology of monogenic inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Jodie Deborah Ouahed
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.786

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.