Literature DB >> 34663942

Controllable genome editing with split-engineered base editors.

Kiara N Berríos1, Niklaus H Evitt2, Rachel A DeWeerd3, Diqiu Ren4, Meiqi Luo5, Aleksia Barka5, Tong Wang1, Caroline R Bartman6,7, Yemin Lan6, Abby M Green3, Junwei Shi8,9,10, Rahul M Kohli11,12,13.   

Abstract

DNA deaminase enzymes play key roles in immunity and have recently been harnessed for their biotechnological applications. In base editors (BEs), the combination of DNA deaminase mutator activity with CRISPR-Cas localization confers the powerful ability to directly convert one target DNA base into another. While efforts have been made to improve targeting efficiency and precision, all BEs so far use a constitutively active DNA deaminase. The absence of regulatory control over promiscuous deaminase activity remains a major limitation to accessing the widespread potential of BEs. Here, we reveal sites that permit splitting of DNA cytosine deaminases into two inactive fragments, whose reapproximation reconstitutes activity. These findings allow for the development of split-engineered BEs (seBEs), which newly enable small-molecule control over targeted mutator activity. We show that the seBE strategy facilitates robust regulated editing with BE scaffolds containing diverse deaminases, offering a generalizable solution for temporally controlling precision genome editing.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34663942      PMCID: PMC8981362          DOI: 10.1038/s41589-021-00880-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Chem Biol        ISSN: 1552-4450            Impact factor:   15.040


  57 in total

Review 1.  The spectrum of APOBEC3 activity: From anti-viral agents to anti-cancer opportunities.

Authors:  Abby M Green; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-09-13

Review 2.  Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Luke W Koblan; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Targeted AID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Yunqing Ma; Jiayuan Zhang; Weijie Yin; Zhenchao Zhang; Yan Song; Xing Chang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity.

Authors:  Martin Jinek; Krzysztof Chylinski; Ines Fonfara; Michael Hauer; Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Intrinsic Nucleotide Preference of Diversifying Base Editors Guides Antibody Ex Vivo Affinity Maturation.

Authors:  Liu Daisy Liu; Min Huang; Pengfei Dai; Tingting Liu; Shuangshuang Fan; Xueqian Cheng; Yaofeng Zhao; Leng-Siew Yeap; Fei-Long Meng
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 6.  Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells.

Authors:  Holly A Rees; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C:G-to-T:A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity.

Authors:  Alexis C Komor; Kevin T Zhao; Michael S Packer; Nicole M Gaudelli; Amanda L Waterbury; Luke W Koblan; Y Bill Kim; Ahmed H Badran; David R Liu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage.

Authors:  Nicole M Gaudelli; Alexis C Komor; Holly A Rees; Michael S Packer; Ahmed H Badran; David I Bryson; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  AID in Antibody Diversification: There and Back Again.

Authors:  Yuqing Feng; Noé Seija; Javier M Di Noia; Alberto Martin
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 16.687

10.  Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage.

Authors:  Alexis C Komor; Yongjoo B Kim; Michael S Packer; John A Zuris; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Eliminating predictable DNA off-target effects of cytosine base editor by using dual guiders including sgRNA and TALE.

Authors:  Jizeng Zhou; Yang Liu; Yuhui Wei; Shuwen Zheng; Shixue Gou; Tao Chen; Yang Yang; Ting Lan; Min Chen; Yuan Liao; Quanjun Zhang; Chengcheng Tang; Yu Liu; Yunqin Wu; Xiaohua Peng; Minghui Gao; Junwei Wang; Kun Zhang; Liangxue Lai; Qingjian Zou
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 12.910

2.  Modular (de)construction of complex bacterial phenotypes by CRISPR/nCas9-assisted, multiplex cytidine base-editing.

Authors:  Daniel C Volke; Román A Martino; Ekaterina Kozaeva; Andrea M Smania; Pablo I Nikel
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 3.  Small Molecules for Enhancing the Precision and Safety of Genome Editing.

Authors:  Siyoon Shin; Seeun Jang; Donghyun Lim
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.