Literature DB >> 34663628

The Global Configuration of Visual Stimuli Alters Co-Fluctuations of Cross-Hemispheric Human Brain Activity.

Shahin Nasr1,2, David Kleinfeld3,4, Jonathan R Polimeni5,2,6.   

Abstract

We tested how a stimulus gestalt, defined by the neuronal interaction between local and global features of a stimulus, is represented within human primary visual cortex (V1). We used high-resolution fMRI, which serves as a surrogate of neuronal activation, to measure co-fluctuations within subregions of V1 as (male and female) subjects were presented with peripheral stimuli, each with different global configurations. We found stronger cross-hemisphere correlations when fine-scale V1 cortical subregions represented parts of the same object compared with different objects. This result was consistent with the vertical bias in global processing and, critically, was independent of the task and local discontinuities within objects. Thus, despite the relatively small receptive fields of neurons within V1, global stimulus configuration affects neuronal processing via correlated fluctuations between regions that represent different sectors of the visual field.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We provide the first evidence for the impact of global stimulus configuration on cross-hemispheric fMRI fluctuations, measured in human primary visual cortex. Our results are consistent with changes in the level of γ-band synchrony, which has been shown to be affected by global stimulus configuration, being reflected in the level fMRI co-fluctuations. These data help narrow the gap between knowledge of global stimulus configuration encoding at the single-neuron level versus at the behavioral level.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binding problem; feature conjunction; high-resolution fMRI; primary visual cortex (V1); spontaneous activity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34663628      PMCID: PMC8612647          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3214-20.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  54 in total

Review 1.  The role of neural mechanisms of attention in solving the binding problem.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; R Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Serge O Dumoulin; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries.

Authors:  Nicole A Thomas; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information.

Authors:  G L Shulman; J Wilson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Spatial attention and cuing to global and local levels of hierarchical structure.

Authors:  L C Robertson; R Egly; M R Lamb; L Kerth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Local or global? Attentional selection of spatial frequencies binds shapes to hierarchical levels.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Shlomo Bentin; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-22

7.  Neuronal dynamics underlying high- and low-frequency EEG oscillations contribute independently to the human BOLD signal.

Authors:  René Scheeringa; Pascal Fries; Karl-Magnus Petersson; Robert Oostenveld; Iris Grothe; David G Norris; Peter Hagoort; Marcel C M Bastiaansen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging technology-bridging the gap between noninvasive human imaging and optical microscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Four projection streams from primate V1 to the cytochrome oxidase stripes of V2.

Authors:  Frederick Federer; Jennifer M Ichida; Janelle Jeffs; Ingo Schiessl; Niall McLoughlin; Alessandra Angelucci
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Visual field biases for near and far stimuli in disparity selective columns in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.