Literature DB >> 20424080

Local or global? Attentional selection of spatial frequencies binds shapes to hierarchical levels.

Anastasia V Flevaris1, Shlomo Bentin, Lynn C Robertson.   

Abstract

Contrary to the traditional view that shapes and their hierarchical level (local or global) are a priori integrated in perception, recent evidence suggests that the identity of a shape and its level are encoded independently, implying the need for shape-level binding to account for normal perception. What is the binding mechanism in this case? Using hierarchically arranged letter shapes, we obtained evidence that the left hemisphere has a preference for binding shapes to the local level, whereas the right hemisphere has a preference for binding shapes to the global level. More important, binding is modulated by attentional selection of higher or lower spatial frequencies. Attention to higher spatial frequencies facilitated subsequent binding by the left hemisphere of elements to the local level, whereas attention to lower spatial frequencies facilitated subsequent binding by the right hemisphere of elements to the global level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20424080      PMCID: PMC2861790          DOI: 10.1177/0956797609359909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  35 in total

1.  Solutions to the binding problem: progress through controversy and convergence.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Neural mechanisms of global and local processing. A combined PET and ERP study.

Authors:  H J Heinze; H Hinrichs; M Scholz; W Burchert; G R Mangun
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns.

Authors:  L C Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-09

4.  Hemispheric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  A Martinez; P Moses; L Frank; R Buxton; E Wong; J Stiles
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-05-06       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of high and low spatial frequencies: a facial recognition task.

Authors:  P A Keenan; R D Whitman; J Pepe
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Widely separated spatial frequencies: mechanism interactions.

Authors:  L A Olzak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information.

Authors:  G L Shulman; J Wilson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  'Part-whole' processing in unilateral brain-damaged patients: dysfunction of hierarchical organization.

Authors:  L C Robertson; D C Delis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.

Authors:  A Treisman; H Schmidt
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Attention to hierarchical level influences attentional selection of spatial scale.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Shlomo Bentin; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  26 in total

1.  Perceiving the tree in the woods: segregating brain responses to stimuli constituting natural scenes.

Authors:  Ulla Martens; Nelson Trujillo-Barreto; Thomas Gruber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Parallel processing of general and specific threat during early stages of perception.

Authors:  Yuqi You; Wen Li
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Attentional selection of relative SF mediates global versus local processing: evidence from EEG.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Shlomo Bentin; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Skaiste G Kerusauskaite; Luca Simione; Antonino Raffone; Narayanan Srinivasan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modulation of Global and Local Processing Biases in Adults with Autistic-like Traits.

Authors:  Michael C W English; Murray T Maybery; Troy A W Visser
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-09

6.  Modulation of non-spatial attention and the global/local processing bias.

Authors:  Thomas M Van Vleet; Albert K Hoang-duc; Joseph DeGutis; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Reduced Pseudoneglect for Physical Space, but not Mental Representations of Space, for Adults with Autistic Traits.

Authors:  Michael C W English; Murray T Maybery; Troy A W Visser
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2017-07

8.  Atypical category processing and hemispheric asymmetries in high-functioning children with autism: revealed through high-density EEG mapping.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; Mark E McCourt; Kristina N Dumas; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Color-shape associations affect feature binding.

Authors:  Na Chen; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02

10.  Priming global and local processing of composite faces: revisiting the processing-bias effect on face perception.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Anastasia V Flevaris; Lynn C Robertson; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.