| Literature DB >> 34663409 |
Xu Li1, Zhiyuan Guan2, Xiao Chen1, Buzhou Chen1, Lei Kong1, Jintao Han3, Wenzhi Zhang4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There are few reports about minimally invasive decompression and fixation for patients with thoracolumbar fracture and neurological symptoms. The previously reported method requires complete laminectomy, and removal of the medial part of the pedicle to expose the spinal canal for reduction. Thus, some approach-related damage to the bony structure and soft tissue still occurs. This study was performed to describe a modified minimally invasive tube technique for decompression and reduction of thoracolumbar fracture with neurological symptoms. This modified technique preserves most of the posterior structures of the spine as well as the muscle.Entities:
Keywords: Decompression under tube; Microscope; Neurological deficits; Percutaneous pedicle screw; Thoracolumbar fracture
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34663409 PMCID: PMC8525019 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02783-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1Radiograph of a 30-year-old patient who sustained a T11 burst fracture after a fall (A). Computed tomography showed that a large bone fragment had herniated into the spinal canal (B)
Fig. 2After placement of percutaneous pedicle screws at the pedicles and reduction by retraction on the screws, the rod on the decompression side was removed and a tube was placed on the facet joint
Fig. 3Image taken by a microscope. A probe (P) was used to reduce the bone fragment through the gap between the dura (D) and the pedicle, which could be detected along the facet joint (F). The suction tube (S) can also be seen in the picture
Patients' data
| ID | Fracture level | Fixed level | TLICS score | AO type | ASIA pre-OP | ASIA post-OP | ASIA last-FU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L3 | L2-4 | 5 | A3 | D | E | E |
| 2 | T11 | T10-12 | 5 | A3 | C | C | D |
| 3 | L1 | T12-L2 | 5 | A3 | D | D | E |
| 4 | L1 | T11-L3 | 7 | A3 | C | C | D |
| 5 | L1 | T12-L2 | 5 | A4 | D | D | E |
| 6 | L4 | L3-5 | 5 | A3 | D | D | E |
| 7 | L1 | T12-L2 | 5 | A4 | D | D | E |
| 8 | L3 | L2-5 | 7 | A4 | C | C | E |
Fig. 4Computed tomography demonstrated that the bone fragment that had herniated into the spinal canal (A) was successfully reduced (B)
Fig. 5Postoperative radiograph. The fracture was reduced and the position of the screw was good
Fig. 6Magnetic resonance image of thoracic fracture. The bone fragment compressed the spinal cord (D). The subarachnoid space (S) can be seen between the slope (arrow) of the fragment and the spinal cord