| Literature DB >> 34662163 |
Paolo Calabrò1,2, Felice Gragnano1,2, Giampaolo Niccoli3,4,5, Rossella Marcucci6, Marco Zimarino7, Carmen Spaccarotella8, Giulia Renda7, Giuseppe Patti9, Giuseppe Andò10, Elisabetta Moscarella1,2, Massimo Mancone11, Arturo Cesaro1,2, Gennaro Giustino12, Raffaele De Caterina13, Roxana Mehran12, Davide Capodanno14,15, Marco Valgimigli16,17, Stephan Windecker17, George D Dangas12, Ciro Indolfi8,18, Dominick J Angiolillo19.
Abstract
Contemporary evidence supports device-based transcatheter interventions for the management of patients with structural heart disease. These procedures, which include aortic valve implantation, mitral or tricuspid valve repair/implantation, left atrial appendage occlusion, and patent foramen ovale closure, profoundly differ with respect to clinical indications and procedural aspects. Yet, patients undergoing transcatheter cardiac interventions require antithrombotic therapy before, during, or after the procedure to prevent thromboembolic events. However, these therapies are associated with an increased risk of bleeding complications. To date, challenges and controversies exist regarding balancing the risk of thrombotic and bleeding complications in these patients such that the optimal antithrombotic regimens to adopt in each specific procedure is still unclear. In this review, we summarize current evidence on antithrombotic therapies for device-based transcatheter interventions targeting structural heart disease and emphasize the importance of a tailored approach in these patients.Entities:
Keywords: anticoagulants; atrial appendage; atrial fibrillation; foramen ovale, patent; mitral valve; thrombosis; transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34662163 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.054305
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Circulation ISSN: 0009-7322 Impact factor: 29.690