Literature DB >> 34661710

Clinical and technical determinants of positive temporal artery biopsy: a retrospective cohort study.

Fatima Alnaimat1, Ahmad T Mansour2,3, Hamza Alduraidi4, Soud Al-Qasem5, Mohammad Hindi5, Tala Rawashdeh5, Eman Hassan6, Sahar Almustafa3, Refat Hanbali6, Osama Ababneh7.   

Abstract

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is one of the diagnostic tools to confirm the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA). We aim to evaluate the clinical and technical determinants of a positive biopsy. Demographics, clinical, technical, and laboratory data of all TAB's performed between 2007 and 2019 at a single academic medical center. 107 biopsies performed for 103 patients were included; 72.9% were female, and 27.1% were male. The mean age at the time of biopsy was 67.1 ± 9.3 years. One biopsy was excluded for lack of arterial tissue content. Of the remaining 106, 19.6% were positive. The length of the biopsy and the number of arterial cross-sections were not significantly associated with its result. A positive biopsy was seen more in patients with low albumin (p = 0.010) and hypothyroidism (p = 0.017) but less in those with prior glucocorticoids treatment (p = 0.028). Predictors of a positive biopsy included male gender [OR 4.029, 95% CI (1.330-12.209), p = 0.014]; elevated ESR [OR 3.998, 95% CI (1.908-6.787), p = 0.023]; polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) symptoms [OR 5.121, 95% CI (2.094-9.872), p = 0.001]; and advancing in age (6.5% per every additional year), [OR 1.065, 95% CI (1.005-1.130), p = 0.033]. 53.7% of the patients were eventually diagnosed with GCA; 39.2% of them were based on positive biopsy. In conclusion, old age, male gender, elevated ESR, and PMR symptoms increase the odds of positive TAB. Technical factors, such as biopsy length and the number of cross-sections, did not influence eventual biopsy results, highlighting the pivotal role of the clinical presentation of the patients in selecting patients for TAB.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arteritis; Biopsy; Giant cell arteritis; TAB; Temporal arteries

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34661710     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-05028-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  30 in total

Review 1.  Giant cell arteritis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Miguel A Gonzalez-Gay; Cristina Martinez-Dubois; Mario Agudo; Orlando Pompei; Ricardo Blanco; Javier Llorca
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Bhaskar Dasgupta; Frances A Borg; Nada Hassan; Leslie Alexander; Kevin Barraclough; Brian Bourke; Joan Fulcher; Jane Hollywood; Andrew Hutchings; Pat James; Valerie Kyle; Jennifer Nott; Michael Power; Ash Samanta
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 3.  Giant cell arteritis: a review of classification, pathophysiology, geoepidemiology and treatment.

Authors:  Andrea T Borchers; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 9.754

Review 4.  The spectrum of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: revisiting the concept of the disease.

Authors:  Christian Dejaco; Christina Duftner; Frank Buttgereit; Eric L Matteson; Bhaskar Dasgupta
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 5.  A concise review of significantly modified serological biomarkers in giant cell arteritis, as detected by different methods.

Authors:  B Burja; T Kuret; S Sodin-Semrl; K Lakota; Ž Rotar; R Ješe; K Mrak-Poljšak; P Žigon; G G Thallinger; J Feichtinger; S Čučnik; M Tomšič; S Praprotnik; A Hočevar
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 9.754

6.  Overview of the 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference nomenclature of vasculitides.

Authors:  J Charles Jennette
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 7.  The diagnosis and classification of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Gideon Nesher
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 7.094

8.  Association between specimen length and diagnostic yield of temporal artery biopsy.

Authors:  C Grossman; I Ben-Zvi; I Barshack; G Bornstein
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 9.  Genetic epidemiology. Giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica.

Authors:  M A Gonzalez-Gay
Journal:  Arthritis Res       Date:  2001-02-26

10.  Incidence of giant cell arteritis in Western Norway 1972-2012: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  L K Brekke; A P Diamantopoulos; B-T Fevang; J Aβmus; E Esperø; C G Gjesdal
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  1 in total

1.  A study of temporal artery biopsy for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Ronald Butendieck; Kenneth Calamia; Adam Sandin
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.650

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.