C Grossman1,2, I Ben-Zvi1,2, I Barshack2,3, G Bornstein2,4. 1. a Department of Internal Medicine F and the Rheumatology Unit , Chaim Sheba Medical Centre , Tel-Hashomer , Israel. 2. b Sackler Faculty of Medicine , Tel-Aviv University , Tel-Aviv , Israel. 3. c Department of Pathology , Chaim Sheba Medical Centre , Tel-Hashomer , Israel. 4. d Department of Internal Medicine D and the Rheumatology Unit , Chaim Sheba Medical Centre , Tel-Hashomer , Israel.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is performed in patients suspected of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Inadequate TAB specimen length is considered a possible explanation for a negative biopsy in patients with GCA. We investigated the association between specimen length and diagnostic yield of TAB. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 240 patients who underwent TAB in a single hospital between 2000 and 2015. Patients were diagnosed with GCA based on positive TAB or, when TAB was negative, on clinical grounds that fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 criteria. Baseline clinical and laboratory features and TAB length were obtained from medical records. Among patients diagnosed with GCA, the rate of TAB positivity was calculated according to biopsy length (< 5, 5-9, 10-14, and ≥ 20 mm). RESULTS: Out of 240 patients, 88 were diagnosed with GCA: 62 had a positive TAB and 26 were diagnosed based on clinical grounds despite a negative TAB. Among those who were diagnosed with GCA, the length of the TAB specimen was similar in those with a positive and a negative TAB (1.13 ± 1.68 mm vs. 1.15 ± 0.61 mm, respectively, p = 0.928). The TAB positivity rate was similar among all ranges of biopsy length [< 5 mm: 7/10 (70%); 5-9 mm: 22/31 (71%); 10-14 mm: 11/16 (69%); 15-19 mm: 11/16 (69%); ≥ 20 mm: 11/15 (73%, p = ns] and was similar to the overall biopsy positivity rate. CONCLUSIONS: Specimen length is not associated with diagnostic yield of TAB.
OBJECTIVES: Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is performed in patients suspected of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Inadequate TAB specimen length is considered a possible explanation for a negative biopsy in patients with GCA. We investigated the association between specimen length and diagnostic yield of TAB. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 240 patients who underwent TAB in a single hospital between 2000 and 2015. Patients were diagnosed with GCA based on positive TAB or, when TAB was negative, on clinical grounds that fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 criteria. Baseline clinical and laboratory features and TAB length were obtained from medical records. Among patients diagnosed with GCA, the rate of TAB positivity was calculated according to biopsy length (< 5, 5-9, 10-14, and ≥ 20 mm). RESULTS: Out of 240 patients, 88 were diagnosed with GCA: 62 had a positive TAB and 26 were diagnosed based on clinical grounds despite a negative TAB. Among those who were diagnosed with GCA, the length of the TAB specimen was similar in those with a positive and a negative TAB (1.13 ± 1.68 mm vs. 1.15 ± 0.61 mm, respectively, p = 0.928). The TAB positivity rate was similar among all ranges of biopsy length [< 5 mm: 7/10 (70%); 5-9 mm: 22/31 (71%); 10-14 mm: 11/16 (69%); 15-19 mm: 11/16 (69%); ≥ 20 mm: 11/15 (73%, p = ns] and was similar to the overall biopsy positivity rate. CONCLUSIONS: Specimen length is not associated with diagnostic yield of TAB.
Authors: Fatima Alnaimat; Ahmad T Mansour; Hamza Alduraidi; Soud Al-Qasem; Mohammad Hindi; Tala Rawashdeh; Eman Hassan; Sahar Almustafa; Refat Hanbali; Osama Ababneh Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Edsel B Ing; Gabriela Lahaie Luna; Andrew Toren; Royce Ing; John J Chen; Nitika Arora; Nurhan Torun; Otana A Jakpor; J Alexander Fraser; Felix J Tyndel; Arun Ne Sundaram; Xinyang Liu; Cindy Ty Lam; Vivek Patel; Ezekiel Weis; David Jordan; Steven Gilberg; Christian Pagnoux; Martin Ten Hove Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2017-11-22
Authors: Kaveh Abri Aghdam; Mostafa Soltan Sanjari; Navid Manafi; Shabnam Khorramdel; Sayyed Amirpooya Alemzadeh; Roshanak Ali Akbar Navahi Journal: J Ophthalmic Vis Res Date: 2020-04-06