Literature DB >> 34660910

The genome sequence of the Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus Berkenhout 1769.

Kerstin Howe1, Melinda Dwinell2, Mary Shimoyama2, Craig Corton1, Emma Betteridge1, Alexander Dove1, Michael A Quail1, Michelle Smith1, Laura Saba3, Robert W Williams4, Hao Chen5, Anne E Kwitek2, Shane A McCarthy1,6, Marcela Uliano-Silva1, William Chow1, Alan Tracey1, James Torrance1, Ying Sims1, Richard Challis1, Jonathan Threlfall1, Mark Blaxter1.   

Abstract

We present a genome assembly from an individual male Rattus norvegicus (the Norway rat; Chordata; Mammalia; Rodentia; Muridae). The genome sequence is 2.44 gigabases in span. The majority of the assembly is scaffolded into 20 chromosomal pseudomolecules, with both X and Y sex chromosomes assembled. This genome assembly, mRatBN7.2, represents the new reference genome for R. norvegicus and has been adopted by the Genome Reference Consortium. Copyright:
© 2021 Howe K et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Norway rat; Rattus norvegicus; chromosomal; genome sequence; reference genome

Year:  2021        PMID: 34660910      PMCID: PMC8495504          DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16854.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wellcome Open Res        ISSN: 2398-502X


Species taxonomy

Eukaryota; Metazoa; Chordata; Mammalia; Rodentia; Muridae; Rattus; Rattus norvegicus Berkenhout 1769 (NCBI:txid10116).

Introduction

Rattus norvegicus is one of the most well-established experimental model organisms, with use of the species dating back to the mid-19th century ( Modlinska & Pisula, 2020). The longstanding use of R. norvegicus in the laboratory as a model organism has led to a multitude of discoveries, providing insight into human physiology, behaviour and disease. The complexity of R. norvegicus relative to many other model organisms, in addition to its well-characterised physiology, means that it is frequently used in cancer research, behavioral neuroscience, and the pharmaceutical industry. We present the reference genome mRatBN7.2 for the Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus. This genome assembly represents a substantial improvement on the previous assemblies, correcting areas of potential mis-assembly in the 2014 reference assembly, Rnor_6.0 ( Ramdas ). The new reference has a mean genome coverage of ~92x for a single male individual of the BN/NHsdMcwi strain, which was obtained from the same colony as the original “Eve” rat that was sampled 18 years ago for use in previous rat reference genome assemblies (Eve was a female rat of generation F14, the index male described here is generation F61). The new assembly contains no gaps between scaffolds and has a scaffold N50 an order of magnitude higher than the previous reference assembly; with just 756 contigs (N50 >29 Mb), its contiguity is comparable to that of reference assemblies for humans and mice. The production of a high-quality reference genome assembly for R. norvegicus allows researchers using rats for research, as a model organism for human diseases, and for determining drug interactions to have as complete and reliable a genome as possible. The result is a greater depth and certainty in data interpretation and species comparison, which will have numerous benefits for biological understanding and health.

Genome sequence report

The genome was sequenced from the kidney tissue of a single male R. norvegicus (strain BN/NHsdMcwi, generation F61) housed at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. A total of 80-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule long reads (N50, 37 kb) and 31-fold coverage in 10X Genomics read clouds (from molecules with an estimated N50 of 26 kb) were generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data (29-fold coverage). Manual assembly curation corrected 234 missing/misjoins and removed 34 haplotypic duplications, reducing the scaffold number by 4.8%, increasing the scaffold N50 by 0.04% and decreasing the assembly length by 0.9%. The final assembly has a total length of 2.65 Gb in 219 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 135.0 Mb ( Table 1). The majority, 99.7%, of the assembly sequence was assigned to 20 chromosomal-level scaffolds representing 20 autosomes and the X and Y sex chromosomes ( Figure 1– Figure 4; Table 2). The assembly has a BUSCO ( Simão ) completeness of 96.2% using the mammalia_odb10 reference set. The primary assembly is a large-scale mosaic of both haplotypes (i.e. is not fully phased) and we have therefore also deposited the contigs corresponding to the alternate haplotype.
Table 1.

Genome data for R. norvegicus.

Project accession data
Assembly identifiermRatBN7.2
Species Rattus norvegicus
SpecimenmRatNor1
NCBI taxonomy ID10116
BioProjectPRJNA662962
BioSample IDSAMN16261960, SAMEA5928170
Isolate informationLaboratory animal, male, kidney tissue
Raw data accessions
PacificBiosciences SEQUEL IIERR5310326-ERR5310327
10X Genomics IlluminaERR5309015-ERR5309022
Hi-C IlluminaERR5309023, ERR5309024
BioNanoERZ1741012
Genome assembly
Assembly accessionGCA_015227675.2
Accession of alternate haplotypeGCA_015244455.1
Span (Mb)2,648
Number of contigs738
Contig N50 length (Mb)34
Number of scaffolds219
Scaffold N50 length (Mb)135
Longest scaffold (Mb)260
BUSCO * genome scoreC:96.2%[S:94.0,D:2.2%],F:0. 9%,M:2.8%,n:9226

*BUSCO scores based on the mammalia_odb10 BUSCO set using v5.0.0. C= complete [S= single copy, D=duplicated], F=fragmented, M=missing, n=number of orthologues in comparison. A full set of BUSCO scores is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Rattus%20norvegicus/dataset/JACYVU01/busco.

Figure 1.

Genome assembly of Rattus norvegicus, mRatBN7.2: metrics.

The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Rattus%20norvegicus/dataset/JACYVU01/snail.

Figure 4.

Genome assembly of Rattus noevegicus, mRatBN7.2: Hi-C contact map.

Hi-C contact map of the mRatBN7.2 assembly, visualised in HiGlass.

Table 2.

Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the primary genome assembly of Rattus norvegicus mRatBN7.2.

AccessionChromosomeSize (Mb)GC%
CM026974.11260.5242.8
CM026975.12249.0540.5
CM026976.13169.0342.5
CM026977.14182.6941.6
CM026978.15166.8842.3
CM026979.16140.9941.9
CM026980.17135.0142.4
CM026981.18123.9043
CM026982.19114.1841.9
CM026983.110107.2145.1
CM026984.11186.2440.8
CM026985.11246.6747.2
CM026986.113106.8141.5
CM026987.114104.8941.3
CM026988.115101.7741.2
CM026989.11684.7341.8
CM026990.11786.5342.6
CM026997.11883.8341.7
CM026992.11957.3444.3
CM026993.12054.4443.7
CM026994.1X152.4539.5
CM026995.1Y18.3242.2
*BUSCO scores based on the mammalia_odb10 BUSCO set using v5.0.0. C= complete [S= single copy, D=duplicated], F=fragmented, M=missing, n=number of orthologues in comparison. A full set of BUSCO scores is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Rattus%20norvegicus/dataset/JACYVU01/busco.

Genome assembly of Rattus norvegicus, mRatBN7.2: metrics.

The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Rattus%20norvegicus/dataset/JACYVU01/snail.

Genome assembly of Rattus norvegicus, mRatBN7.2: GC coverage.

BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Rattus%20norvegicus/dataset/JACYVU01/blob?plotShape=circle.

Genome assembly of Rattus norvegicus, mRatBN7.2: cumulative sequence.

BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Rattus%20norvegicus/dataset/JACYVU01/cumulative.

Genome assembly of Rattus noevegicus, mRatBN7.2: Hi-C contact map.

Hi-C contact map of the mRatBN7.2 assembly, visualised in HiGlass.

Methods

The Norway rat specimen (strain BN/NHsdMcwi, generation F61) was a male individual housed in a standard rodent microisolator cage at the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA. The animal was euthanised by CO 2 inhalation. This procedure was approved by the Medical College of Wisconsin Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. DNA was extracted using an agarose plug extraction from kidney tissue following the Bionano Prep Animal Tissue DNA Isolation Soft Tissue Protocol. Pacific Biosciences CLR long read and 10X Genomics read cloud sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Hi-C data were generated using the Arima v2 Hi-C kit. Sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations DNA Pipelines at the Wellcome Sanger Institute on Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II and Illumina HiSeq X instruments. DNA was labeled for Bionano Genomics optical mapping following the Bionano Prep Direct Label and Stain (DLS) Protocol and run on one Saphyr instrument chip flowcell. Assembly was carried out following the Vertebrate Genome Project pipeline v1.6 ( Rhie ) with Falcon-unzip ( Chin ), haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan ) and a first round of scaffolding carried out with 10X Genomics read clouds using scaff10x (see Table 3 for software versions and sources). Hybrid scaffolding was performed using the BioNano DLE-1 data and BioNano Solve. Scaffolding with Hi-C data ( Rao ) was carried out with SALSA2 ( Ghurye ). The Hi-C scaffolded assembly was polished with arrow using the PacBio data, then polished with the 10X Genomics Illumina data by aligning to the assembly with longranger align, calling variants with freebayes ( Garrison & Marth, 2012) and applying homozygous non-reference edits using bcftools consensus. Two rounds of the Illumina polishing were applied. The assembly was checked for contamination and analysed using the gEVAL system ( Chow ) as described previously ( Howe ). Manual curation was performed using gEVAL, Bionano Access, HiGlass and Pretext. In addition, we used 10X longranger and genetic mapping data provided by LS, RWW, HC and AK to identify and resolve regions of concern. Figure 1– Figure 3 were generated using BlobToolKit ( Challis ).
Table 3.

Software tools used.

Software toolVersionSource
Falcon-unzipfalcon-kit 1.8.0( Chin et al., 2016)
purge_dups1.0.0( Guan et al., 2020)
Bionano SolveSolve3.4.1_09262019 https://bionanogenomics.com/downloads/bionano-solve/
SALSA22.1( Ghurye et al., 2019)
scaff10x4.2 https://github.com/wtsi-hpag/Scaff10X
arrowGCpp-1.9.0 https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/GenomicConsensus
longranger alignlongranger align (2.2.2) https://support.10xgenomics.com/genome-exome/software/ pipelines/latest/advanced/other-pipelines
freebayesv1.3.1-17-gaa2ace8( Garrison & Marth, 2012)
bcftools consensus1.11-88-g71d744f8 http://samtools.github.io/bcftools/bcftools.html
HiGlass1.11.6( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018)
PretextView0.0.4 https://github.com/wtsi-hpag/PretextView
gEVALN/A( Chow et al., 2016)
BlobToolKit1.2( Challis et al., 2020)
Figure 3.

Genome assembly of Rattus norvegicus, mRatBN7.2: cumulative sequence.

BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Rattus%20norvegicus/dataset/JACYVU01/cumulative.

The mitochondrial genome was assembled as part of assembly mRatBN7.1, but was replaced with the pre-existing mitochondrial assembly MT AY172581.1, which is identical. This replacement occurred as annotation already existed for the pre-existing assembly. As such, the primary assembly is now mRatBN7.2.

Data availability

Underlying data

NCBI BioProject: Rattus norvegicus (Norway rat) genome assembly, mRatBN7, Accession number PRJNA662962: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA662962/ NCBI Assembly: mRatBN7.2 primary assembly, Accession number GCA_015227675.2: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCF_015227675.2 NCBI Assembly: mRatBN7.1 alternate haplotype, Accession number GCA_015244455.1: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCA_015244455.1 The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The R. norvegicus genome sequencing initiative is part of the Darwin Tree of Life (DToL) project and the Vertebrate Genome Project (VGP) ordinal references programme. All raw data and the assemblies have been deposited in INSDC databases under BioProject PRJNA662962. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1. The article describes generating a new reference genome assembly for Rattus norvegicus. This update is a significant improvement over the previous reference assembly for this organism and will provide critical support to the rat research community. The article provides structured information on the biological sample, the sequencing and assembly methods, and database identifier citations. I have two revision requests: 1. Table 1: 2. References: Remove BioSample ID SAMEA5928170 from the table. It is a duplicate of SAMN16261960 which is the BioSample ID linked to the primary and alternate haplotype assemblies. Rhie et al. (2021) is published now. Please update this reference to indicate the Nature citation and link to PubMed 33911273 (Towards Complete and Error-Free Genome Assemblies of All Vertebrate Species). I note there is a newer BUSCO publication , please consider if it is more relevant to cite. Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Yes Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Reviewer Expertise: My area of expertise is genome annotation, gene and sequence curation, data management, and product management. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Howe and colleagues report an updated reference genome assembly for the Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus. The team extracted DNA from kidney tissue collected from a male rat (BN/NHsdMcwi), and sequenced the DNA at 80x genome coverage with PacBio long-reads and at 31x genome coverage with 10X genomics short reads, followed by chromosomal confirmation of primary assembly using Hi-C reads at 29x genome coverage. Like all “Data Notes” published in Wellcome Open Research, the manuscript involves four core figures reporting genome assembly: 1) metrics, 2) GC coverage, 3) cumulative sequence and 4) Hi-C contact map plus three core tables demonstrating 1) genome data accession numbers, 2) chromosomal assembly information and 3) software tools used in the study. Recently, we mapped alternative polyadenylation sites to the newest reference genome and found dramatic improvements as compared to previous versions. The advanced genome resources will certainly facilitate functional annotation of the rat genome and promote the initiation of new research fronts to understand the complicated relationships between genome and phenome for better use of the species to model health and diseases in humans. Genome assembly nomenclature. Based on the NCBI collection, there are ten assemblies of the Rattus norvegicus species deposited there so far. As shown in Comment Table 1, each submitter was free to name their assembly. Rnor_6.0 and its previous versions have served as representative reference genomes for a while, which were, however, replaced by mRatBN7.2. As stated by the authors, a female from generation F14 contributed to Rnor_6.0, while a male from generation F61 was used to build the assembly of mRatBN7.2.  In fact, both individuals belonged to the same colony, or the BN/NHsdMcwi strain. Perhaps that is why the authors assigned the version as 7.2, rather than 1.2, for example. My guess is that mRatBN would mean something like a male (m) rat representing Brown Norway (BN). Although the genome is indeed derived from a male, its sequences of autosomes and chromosome X can be used for any female research.  As such, labeling a male-specific assembly is not necessary. In addition, the word “rat” is rather simple, because it is not specific to the Rattus norvegicus species. For example, the Rattus rattus species is the black rat, which has a nuclear genome with 18 autosomes and sex chromosomes X and Y. Therefore, I would suggest that genome assembly nomenclature be standardized for the Rattus norvegicus species. For example, we may use this format: Rnor_Strain (abbreviation for a strain)_xx (version number). Accordingly, mRatBN7.2 may be renamed as Rnor_BN_7.2. Hopefully, the community can discuss this further. Genome description consistency. Generally speaking, assembly and annotation of a genome is an endless task as information evolves. Some inconsistencies need to be addressed or explained in order for the manuscript to be officially published. In terms of genome size, the authors stated that “The genome sequence is 2.44 gigabases in span” in the Abstract, but “a total length of 2.65 Gb” was presented in the Genome Sequence Report section. As shown in Comment Table 1, the latter claim is inconsistent with the NCBI report. In addition, the authors also need to double check the numbers of contigs, scaffolds and their N50 and L50 values as discrepancies exist between Table 1 (reported by the authors) and Comment Table 1 (collected from NCBI). Interestingly, the authors listed PRJNA662962 as the BioProject number, which is different from what is listed at NCBI (PRJNA677964). In fact, PRJNA662962 is not wrong either, but it contains four sub-projects: PRJNA662791, PRJNA663241, PRJNA677964 and PRJEB43118. Nevertheless, PRJNA677964 is directly linked to the assembly GCA_015227675.2. As listed in Table 2, the nuclear genome of the Rattus norvegicus species is split into 22 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including 20 autosomes and 2 sex chromosomes. As such, the claim on “20 chromosomal-level scaffolds representing 20 autosomes and the X and Y sex chromosomes” would certainly cause confusion. Genome report expansion? No doubt, the current version of the manuscript strictly follows the Data Note styles so its focus is on assembly more than annotation. If possible, the team should report any changes in 1) genome structure – genes and gene-related sequences (exons, introns, UTRs and pseudogenes, for example) and intergenic DNA (genome-wide repeats and other intergenic regions) and 2) gene collection – how many genes are terminated, how many genes are renamed (based on new gene nomenclature), how many genes are overlapped and how many new genes are added to the reported assembly. Comment Table 1. Genome assemblies deposited at NCBI for the Norway rat, Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Partly Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Reviewer Expertise: Comparative Genome Biology; Genome Sequencing; Functional Analysis; Alternative Transcriptome I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
  13 in total

1.  BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.

Authors:  Felipe A Simão; Robert M Waterhouse; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Phased diploid genome assembly with single-molecule real-time sequencing.

Authors:  Chen-Shan Chin; Paul Peluso; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Maria Nattestad; Gregory T Concepcion; Alicia Clum; Christopher Dunn; Ronan O'Malley; Rosa Figueroa-Balderas; Abraham Morales-Cruz; Grant R Cramer; Massimo Delledonne; Chongyuan Luo; Joseph R Ecker; Dario Cantu; David R Rank; Michael C Schatz
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping.

Authors:  Suhas S P Rao; Miriam H Huntley; Neva C Durand; Elena K Stamenova; Ivan D Bochkov; James T Robinson; Adrian L Sanborn; Ido Machol; Arina D Omer; Eric S Lander; Erez Lieberman Aiden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  gEVAL - a web-based browser for evaluating genome assemblies.

Authors:  William Chow; Kim Brugger; Mario Caccamo; Ian Sealy; James Torrance; Kerstin Howe
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species.

Authors:  Arang Rhie; Shane A McCarthy; Olivier Fedrigo; Joana Damas; Giulio Formenti; Sergey Koren; Marcela Uliano-Silva; William Chow; Arkarachai Fungtammasan; Juwan Kim; Chul Lee; Byung June Ko; Mark Chaisson; Gregory L Gedman; Lindsey J Cantin; Francoise Thibaud-Nissen; Leanne Haggerty; Iliana Bista; Michelle Smith; Bettina Haase; Jacquelyn Mountcastle; Sylke Winkler; Sadye Paez; Jason Howard; Sonja C Vernes; Tanya M Lama; Frank Grutzner; Wesley C Warren; Christopher N Balakrishnan; Dave Burt; Julia M George; Matthew T Biegler; David Iorns; Andrew Digby; Daryl Eason; Bruce Robertson; Taylor Edwards; Mark Wilkinson; George Turner; Axel Meyer; Andreas F Kautt; Paolo Franchini; H William Detrich; Hannes Svardal; Maximilian Wagner; Gavin J P Naylor; Martin Pippel; Milan Malinsky; Mark Mooney; Maria Simbirsky; Brett T Hannigan; Trevor Pesout; Marlys Houck; Ann Misuraca; Sarah B Kingan; Richard Hall; Zev Kronenberg; Ivan Sović; Christopher Dunn; Zemin Ning; Alex Hastie; Joyce Lee; Siddarth Selvaraj; Richard E Green; Nicholas H Putnam; Ivo Gut; Jay Ghurye; Erik Garrison; Ying Sims; Joanna Collins; Sarah Pelan; James Torrance; Alan Tracey; Jonathan Wood; Robel E Dagnew; Dengfeng Guan; Sarah E London; David F Clayton; Claudio V Mello; Samantha R Friedrich; Peter V Lovell; Ekaterina Osipova; Farooq O Al-Ajli; Simona Secomandi; Heebal Kim; Constantina Theofanopoulou; Michael Hiller; Yang Zhou; Robert S Harris; Kateryna D Makova; Paul Medvedev; Jinna Hoffman; Patrick Masterson; Karen Clark; Fergal Martin; Kevin Howe; Paul Flicek; Brian P Walenz; Woori Kwak; Hiram Clawson; Mark Diekhans; Luis Nassar; Benedict Paten; Robert H S Kraus; Andrew J Crawford; M Thomas P Gilbert; Guojie Zhang; Byrappa Venkatesh; Robert W Murphy; Klaus-Peter Koepfli; Beth Shapiro; Warren E Johnson; Federica Di Palma; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Emma C Teeling; Tandy Warnow; Jennifer Marshall Graves; Oliver A Ryder; David Haussler; Stephen J O'Brien; Jonas Korlach; Harris A Lewin; Kerstin Howe; Eugene W Myers; Richard Durbin; Adam M Phillippy; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Significantly improving the quality of genome assemblies through curation.

Authors:  Kerstin Howe; William Chow; Joanna Collins; Sarah Pelan; Damon-Lee Pointon; Ying Sims; James Torrance; Alan Tracey; Jonathan Wood
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 6.524

7.  Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies.

Authors:  Dengfeng Guan; Shane A McCarthy; Jonathan Wood; Kerstin Howe; Yadong Wang; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps.

Authors:  Peter Kerpedjiev; Nezar Abdennur; Fritz Lekschas; Chuck McCallum; Kasper Dinkla; Hendrik Strobelt; Jacob M Luber; Scott B Ouellette; Alaleh Azhir; Nikhil Kumar; Jeewon Hwang; Soohyun Lee; Burak H Alver; Hanspeter Pfister; Leonid A Mirny; Peter J Park; Nils Gehlenborg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  The Norway rat, from an obnoxious pest to a laboratory pet.

Authors:  Klaudia Modlinska; Wojciech Pisula
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  BUSCO Update: Novel and Streamlined Workflows along with Broader and Deeper Phylogenetic Coverage for Scoring of Eukaryotic, Prokaryotic, and Viral Genomes.

Authors:  Mosè Manni; Matthew R Berkeley; Mathieu Seppey; Felipe A Simão; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  mRatBN7.2: familiar and unfamiliar features of a new rat genome reference assembly.

Authors:  Tristan V de Jong; Hao Chen; Wesley A Brashear; Kelli J Kochan; Andrew E Hillhouse; Yaming Zhu; Isha S Dhande; Elizabeth A Hudson; Mary H Sumlut; Melissa L Smith; Theodore S Kalbfleisch; Peter A Doris
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Body Composition and Metabolic Changes in a Lyon Hypertensive Congenic Rat and Identification of Ercc6l2 as a Positional Candidate Gene.

Authors:  Karen C Clark; Valerie A Wagner; Katie L Holl; John J Reho; Monika Tutaj; Jennifer R Smith; Melinda R Dwinell; Justin L Grobe; Anne E Kwitek
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Reactive Astrocytes Derived From Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Suppress Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cell Differentiation.

Authors:  Matthew D Smith; Xitiz Chamling; Alexander J Gill; Hector Martinez; Weifeng Li; Kathryn C Fitzgerald; Elias S Sotirchos; Dorota Moroziewicz; Lauren Bauer; Daniel Paull; Marjan Gharagozloo; Pavan Bhargava; Donald J Zack; Valentina Fossati; Peter A Calabresi
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Sequence locally, think globally: The Darwin Tree of Life Project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Probing the genomic limits of de-extinction in the Christmas Island rat.

Authors:  Jianqing Lin; David Duchêne; Christian Carøe; Oliver Smith; Marta Maria Ciucani; Jonas Niemann; Douglas Richmond; Alex D Greenwood; Ross MacPhee; Guojie Zhang; Shyam Gopalakrishnan; M Thomas P Gilbert
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 10.900

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.