Literature DB >> 34658036

Censoring-robust time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve estimators.

Michelle M Nuño1,2, Daniel L Gillen3.   

Abstract

Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves are often used to evaluate the classification performance of continuous measures when considering time-to-event data. When one is interested in evaluating the predictive performance of multiple covariates, it is common to use the Cox proportional hazards model to obtain risk scores; however, previous work has shown that when the model is mis-specified, the estimand corresponding to the partial likelihood estimator depends on the censoring distribution. In this manuscript, we show that when the risk score model is mis-specified, the AUC will also depend on the censoring distribution, leading to either over- or under-estimation of the risk score's predictive performance. We propose the use of censoring-robust estimators to remove the dependence on the censoring distribution and provide empirical results supporting the use of censoring-robust risk scores.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  area under the curve; model mis-specification; predictive performance; survival analysis; time-dependent receive operating characteristic curves

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34658036      PMCID: PMC8671363          DOI: 10.1002/sim.9216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  23 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Estimating average regression effect under non-proportional hazards.

Authors:  R Xu; J O'Quigley
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  Biomarkers: potential uses and limitations.

Authors:  Richard Mayeux
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-04

4.  Beta amyloid in Alzheimer's disease: increased deposition in brain is reflected in reduced concentration in cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Timo Grimmer; Matthias Riemenschneider; Hans Förstl; Gjermund Henriksen; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Tohru Shiga; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Alexander Kurz; Alexander Drzezga
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 5.  Cerebrospinal fluid protein biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Kaj Blennow
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-04

6.  Discrimination measures for survival outcomes: connection between the AUC and the predictiveness curve.

Authors:  Vivian Viallon; Aurélien Latouche
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Robust estimation in the nested case-control design under a misspecified covariate functional form.

Authors:  Michelle M Nuño; Daniel L Gillen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects.

Authors:  Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 9.  CSF biomarkers for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  K Blennow
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  W G Rosen; R C Mohs; K L Davis
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 18.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.