Literature DB >> 34657575

The healthcare buffet: preferences in the clinical decision-making process for patients with musculoskeletal pain.

Joel E Bialosky1,2,3, Josh A Cleland4, Paul Mintken5, Jason M Beneciuk1,2, Mark D Bishop1,2.   

Abstract

The preferences a person has for care are associated with outcomes for patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain conditions. These include preferences for differing levels of involvement in the decision-making process, preferences for the provider attributes, and preferences for particular interventions. In this paper, we discuss these various forms of preference, as well as how they influence clinical care within shared decision-making frameworks. We also present a conceptual framing for how patient preferences can be incorporated in clinical decision-making by orthopedic manual physical therapists. Finally, research implications for interpreting findings from clinical studies are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Manual therapy; musculoskeletal; orthopedic; pain; shared decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34657575      PMCID: PMC8967189          DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2021.1989754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Man Manip Ther        ISSN: 1066-9817


  80 in total

1.  Do patients choose physicians of their own race?

Authors:  S Saha; S H Taggart; M Komaromy; A B Bindman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Pamela J Atherton; Tenbroeck Smith; Thomas F Hack; Mashele M Huschka; Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Brent Diekmann; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Juan Pablo Brito; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  L F Degner; J A Sloan; P Venkatesh
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  1997

5.  The adoption of person-centred care in chiropractic practice and its effect on non-specific spinal pain: An observational study.

Authors:  Norman Stomski; Paul Morrison; Jill Maben; Lyndon Amorin-Woods; Emad Ardakani; Jean Théroux
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.446

6.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

Review 7.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

Review 8.  Effect of Treatment Preference in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dimittri Delevry; Quang A Le
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Racial disparities in health care utilization, the affordable care act and racial concordance preference.

Authors:  Alyson Ma; Alison Sanchez; Mindy Ma
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2021-08-24

10.  Musculoskeletal pain stakeholder engagement and partnership development: determining patient-centered research priorities.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Dorothy Verstandig; Chuck Taylor; Doug Scott; Joan Levin; Raine Osborne; Joel E Bialosky; Trevor A Lentz; Tava Buck; Anita L Davis; Christina Harder; Monika B Beneciuk; Virgil Wittmer; James Sylvester; Robert Rowe; David McInnes; Tad P Fisher; Lisa McGarrie
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.