Literature DB >> 34655410

Frozen-Permanent Section Discrepancy Rate in Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Serenella Serinelli1, Stephanie M Bryant2, Michael P A Williams2, Mark Marzouk3, Daniel J Zaccarini2.   

Abstract

Frozen section evaluation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is critical for margin status and subsequent patient therapy. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the rate of frozen-permanent section discrepancies in blocks with two frozen section levels compared to ≥ three levels in oral cavity and oropharyngeal SCCs. A search of the cases with both intraoperative frozen sections and corresponding permanent sections for SCCs in the oral cavity and oropharynx was performed. Frozen sections and permanent slides were compared. The nature of discrepancies was assigned to one of the following: change in diagnosis, margin status, or distance of the tumor from the margin. The cause of the discrepancy was designated as one of the following: block sampling, gross sampling, interpretation, or technical error. The pathologist experience, frozen section technical experience, and intraoperative impact of each discrepancy were also evaluated. A total of 654 frozen and corresponding permanent blocks were assessed. For 532 of the frozen section blocks, two levels were cut, while 122 frozen section blocks had ≥ three levels. Thirty-five frozen-permanent section discrepancies were observed (5.4% of all blocks). Among these, 2.5% had a possible or definitive intraoperative impact. The percentage of discrepancies in the ≥ three levels group (5.7%) was slightly higher than the two-level group (5.3%), and this difference was not statistically significant. For the two-level group, the overall block sampling error rate was 4.5%. This was not significantly different from the 4.1% block sampling error rate seen in the ≥ three levels group. The rate of block sampling discrepancy did not show significant differences based on attending or frozen section technical experience. A change in margin distance (closer margin detected on permanent) occurred in 4% of the blocks and involved 16% of the patients. This review of oral cavity and oropharynx SCCs frozen/permanent section discrepancies shows that the error rate is not significantly different depending on the number of levels cut. The results suggest that always performing more than two frozen section levels may not yield a decreased discrepancy rate. A change in margin distance occurred quite frequently, but only in rare cases it had a definitive impact on the intraoperative management. Given the importance of correct intraoperative diagnosis in patient management, additional levels may be warranted depending on the clinical scenario.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrepancy; Frozen section; Head and neck; Margins; Permanent section; Squamous cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34655410      PMCID: PMC9187809          DOI: 10.1007/s12105-021-01385-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck Pathol        ISSN: 1936-055X


  16 in total

1.  Critical evaluation of frozen section margins in head and neck cancer resections.

Authors:  Candice Black; Jonathan Marotti; Elena Zarovnaya; Joseph Paydarfar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Intraoperative pathology consultation: error, cause and impact.

Authors:  Etienne Mahe; Shamim Ara; Mona Bishara; Annie Kurian; Syeda Tauqir; Nafisa Ursani; Pooja Vasudev; Tariq Aziz; Cathy Ross; Alice Lytwyn
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Early Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Simion I Chiosea
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2016-12-10

4.  The accuracy and usefulness of frozen-section diagnosis.

Authors:  K Ikemura; R Ohya
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Refining the utility and role of Frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection.

Authors:  Eugenie Du; Thomas J Ow; Yung-Tai Lo; Adam Gersten; Bradley A Schiff; Andrew B Tassler; Richard V Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Accuracy of frozen sections in assessing margins in oral cancer resection.

Authors:  R A Ord; S Aisner
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Reliability of frozen section diagnosis in head and neck neoplasms.

Authors:  K A Remsen; F E Lucente; H F Biller
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Frozen Section Evaluation of Margin Status in Primary Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: A Correlation Study of Frozen Section and Final Diagnoses.

Authors:  Eleanor M Layfield; Robert L Schmidt; Magda Esebua; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2017-08-23

9.  Early Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Sampling of Margins From Tumor Bed and Worse Local Control.

Authors:  Jessica H Maxwell; Lester D R Thompson; Margaret S Brandwein-Gensler; Bernhard G Weiss; Martin Canis; Bibianna Purgina; Arpan V Prabhu; Chi Lai; Yongli Shuai; William R Carroll; Anthony Morlandt; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Seungwon Kim; Jonas T Johnson; Robert L Ferris; Raja Seethala; Simion I Chiosea
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.223

10.  Accuracy of Frozen Section with Histopathological Report in an Institute.

Authors:  Purbesh Adhikari; Paricha Upadhyaya; Smriti Karki; Chandra Shekhar Agrawal; Shyam Thapa Chettri; Ajay Agrawal
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.406

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association of Intraoperative Frozen Section Controls With Improved Margin Assessment During Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Alice C Yu; David D Afework; Jeffrey D Goldstein; Elliot Abemayor; Abie H Mendelsohn
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 8.961

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.