| Literature DB >> 34653311 |
Anderson Brito da Silva1,2, Jane Pennifold3, Ben Henley3, Koustav Chatterjee4, David Bateman5, Roger W Whittaker1,6, Abhijit Joshi7, Hrishikesh Kumar4, Claire Nicholson8, Mark R Baker1,6, Stuart D Greenhill3, Richard Walsh9, Stefano Seri9, Roland S G Jones10, Gavin L Woodhall3, Mark O Cunningham1,11.
Abstract
Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is one of the most common malformations causing refractory epilepsy. Dysregulation of glutamatergic systems plays a critical role in the hyperexcitability of dysplastic neurons in FCD lesions. The pharmacoresistant nature of epilepsy associated with FCD may be due to a lack of well-tolerated and precise antiepileptic drugs that can target glutamate receptors. Here, for the first time in human FCD brain slices, we show that the established, noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, perampanel has potent antiepileptic action. Moreover, we demonstrate that this effect is due to a reduction in burst firing behavior in human FCD microcircuits. These data support a potential role for the treatment of refractory epilepsy associated with FCD in human patients.Entities:
Keywords: AMPA; epilepsy; focal cortical dysplasia; glutamate; perampanel
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34653311 PMCID: PMC9436284 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsia Open ISSN: 2470-9239
FIGURE 1Suppression of seizure activity by perampanel in human FCD brain slices. (A) Axial T2 MR image (from Patient 2) through the temporal poles illustrating the location (white arrow) of an FCD lesion in the right lateral anterior temporal pole; (B) H&E‐stained sections showing dysmorphic neurons; (C) immunohistochemistry for nonphosphorylated neurofilament protein (SMI32) showing aberrant NFP accumulation in dysmorphic neurons; (D) NeuN immunohistochemistry illustrating regions with better preserved cortical structure compared with (E) which shows regions with abnormal architecture and neuronal depletion; (F) patient age, sex, FCD IIb lesion and location, semiology, and AEDs; (G) raw LFP traces illustrating ictal discharges recorded in 0.25 mM Mg2+ and 8 mM K+ in the absence (top) and presence of perampanel (bottom); (H) power spectra generated from example traces in the absence (black) and presence of perampanel (red); (I) area power (1‐1000 Hz) values for all experiments demonstrating the ability of perampanel to suppress epileptiform activity in all samples tested. Scale bars represent 0.5 mV and 1 min. AED, antiepileptic drug; CBZ, carbamazepine; CLOB, clobazam; FCD, focal cortical dysplasia; H&E, hemotoxylin and eosin; LEV, levetiracetam; LFP, local field potential; LTG, lamotrigine; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NeuN, neuronal nuclear antigen; NFP, neurofilament protein; PER, perampanel; TOP, topiramate
FIGURE 2Impact of therapeutically relevant concentration of perampanel on epileptic network dynamics. MEA recordings of ictal discharges recorded in 0.25 mM Mg2+ and 8 mM K+ showing (A) raw LFP, (B) HFO, and (C) MUA rastergram behavior in baseline (left) conditions and in the presence of perampanel (1 µM) (right). Graphs illustrate the effect of perampanel on (D) HFO, (E) MUA, (F) burstiness, and (G) LFP for all channels analyzed, and (H) shows the impact of perampanel for each of these variables represented as percentage change; all parameters were significantly reduced when washed with perampanel (paired Wilcoxon test: ****P < .0001). Correlation between HFO and MUA showing (I) the average (black line) and standard error (grey shadow) of raw signal segments containing HFO from one example channel; (J) average of the same segments in (I) filtered between 60 and 600 Hz; (K) cross‐correlograms of the time difference between MUA and HFO for the same channel displayed in (I) and (B); for the baseline condition, n = 153 HFO and for the treated condition, n = 47 HFO. (L) Boxplot of the mean and mode of all cross‐correlograms (as displayed in K) from all channels (n = 250 channels). Scale bars for (A) represent 0.1 mV and 1 min and for (I) and (J) represent 40 and 5 µV, respectively. HFO, high‐frequency oscillations; LFP, local field potential; MEA, multielectrode array; MUA, multiunit activity; PER, perampanel