Literature DB >> 34652616

South Africa's contribution of insect records on the BOLD system.

Mart-Mari M Myburgh1, M Thabang Madisha1, Willem G Coetzer2.   

Abstract

South Africa is the third most biodiverse country in the world and insects represent a large part of its faunal diversity, as is seen globally. With more than 65,000 described animal species in South Africa, insects represent 44,088 species. While there are still a lot of species yet to be identified, progress may be hindered by the few insect taxonomists available in South Africa and subsequently, the time-consuming nature and costs of the methods used during species identification. DNA barcoding, on the other hand, has become a valuable tool for documenting biodiversity with the use of a small DNA fragment such as cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (COI). This paper aims to assess South Africa's contribution to the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) as well as highlight the regions that are under-represented on BOLD. From the 4,984,215 Insecta records on BOLD, South Africa contributed 56,392 insect records, with only 16.85% of that total identified to species level. The Gauteng Province had the most represented insect samples submitted to BOLD with 63.57% followed by Kwazulu-Natal (15.74%), and Mpumalanga (5.73%). However, the Free State, Limpopo, and the Northern Cape provinces are all under-represented on BOLD. This is evident as both the Northern Cape and Limpopo provinces contain one or more biodiversity hotspots which in turn displays the high levels of biodiversity that could still be recorded on BOLD. Improving our understanding with regards to DNA barcoding data linked to geographical regions, as well as specific insect groups, can highlight the areas in need of more research.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BOLD; Biodiversity; COI; Insect; South Africa

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34652616     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-021-06822-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  9 in total

Review 1.  Slow mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution in the Anthozoa (Cnidaria).

Authors:  T L Shearer; M J H Van Oppen; S L Romano; G Wörheide
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Species discovery versus species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: response to Rubinoff.

Authors:  Rob Desalle
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 3.  DNA barcoding for ecologists.

Authors:  Alice Valentini; François Pompanon; Pierre Taberlet
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Biodiversity studies: science and policy.

Authors:  P R Ehrlich; E Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Plant diversity accurately predicts insect diversity in two tropical landscapes.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Siliang Lin; Yinqiu Ji; Chenxue Yang; Xiaoyang Wang; Chunyan Yang; Hesheng Wang; Haisheng Jiang; Rhett D Harrison; Douglas W Yu
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  A new approach to an old conundrum--DNA barcoding sheds new light on phenotypic plasticity and morphological stasis in microsnails (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Carychiidae).

Authors:  Alexander M Weigand; Adrienne Jochum; Markus Pfenninger; Dirk Steinke; Annette Klussmann-Kolb
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 7.  Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity.

Authors:  Céline Bellard; Cleo Bertelsmeier; Paul Leadley; Wilfried Thuiller; Franck Courchamp
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Erin H Penton; John M Burns; Daniel H Janzen; Winnie Hallwachs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Low relative error in consumer-grade GPS units make them ideal for measuring small-scale animal movement patterns.

Authors:  Greg A Breed; Paul M Severns
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.