Literature DB >> 3465233

Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.

S Järvinen.   

Abstract

If the ANB angle is used in cephalometric analyses, its individual nature should be recognized. A method to interpret the measured values of the ANB angle has been recently presented by Hussels and Nanda. This article introduces another method to evaluate the appropriateness of the measured values. A regression analysis was applied to explain the individual variation of the ANB angle in a sample of 55 untreated orthodontic patients, aged 7 to 14 years, with Class I (Angle) malocclusion. Approximately 63% of the variation of the ANB angle could be explained by the variation of the SNA and NSL/ML angles. The regression produced a list of floating norms of the ANB angle for different facial types. The floating norms can help to interpret the individual normal variation of the ANB angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3465233     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(86)90004-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Predictability and Reliability of Different Anterio-Posterior Skeletal Discrepancy Indicators in Different Age Groups - A Cephalometric Study.

Authors:  Rana Tiwari; Tarulatha R Shyagali; Abhishek Gupta; Rishi Joshi; Anil Tiwari; Priyank Sen
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

2.  [Evaluation of the applicability of a mathematical model in the x-ray cephalometric diagnosis of sagittal bite anomalies. A clinical test].

Authors:  S Järvinen
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1989-10

Review 3.  Influence of diabetes mellitus on the development and treatment of malocclusions--a case report with literature review.

Authors:  Christoph Reichert; James Deschner; Andreas Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Floating norms for individualising the ANB angle and the WITS appraisal in orthodontic cephalometric analysis based on guiding variables.

Authors:  Eva Paddenberg; Peter Proff; Christian Kirschneck
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Why WITS? Why not a way beyond?

Authors:  Shipra Nagar; Rohit Nagar; Pradeep Raghav
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-10

6.  Cephalometric Floating Norms for the β Angle and MMBP-Wits.

Authors:  Giuseppe Perinetti; Michele Ceschi; Alessandro Scalia; Luca Contardo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Assessment of Palatal Plane and Occlusal Plane for Determining Anteroposterior Jaw Relation.

Authors:  Ujjwal Pyakurel; Kamal Babu Thapaliya; Khushboo Singh; Alka Gupta; Sujaya Gupta; Manish Bajracharya; Rabindra Man Shrestha; Praveen Mishra
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.406

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.