Literature DB >> 3465198

Clinical methods in psychiatric genetics. I. Robustness of genetic marker investigative strategies.

E S Gershon, L R Goldin.   

Abstract

Population stratification, secondary effects of illness or treatment, biological heterogeneity of a clinical syndrome, or complex biology underlying a syndrome (where only one component is measured) are conditions which may obscure the association of a genetic risk factor with a clinical syndrome. We consider several investigative strategies under each of these conditions. Only segregation-based paradigms are robust to genetic heterogeneity and population stratification. But secondary effects on the risk factor produced by illness or treatment require other strategies for their detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3465198     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1986.tb10594.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand        ISSN: 0001-690X            Impact factor:   6.392


  25 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimaging endophenotypes: strategies for finding genes influencing brain structure and function.

Authors:  David C Glahn; Paul M Thompson; John Blangero
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Defining key features of the broad autism phenotype: a comparison across parents of multiple- and single-incidence autism families.

Authors:  Molly Losh; Debra Childress; Kristen Lam; Joseph Piven
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 3.568

Review 3.  The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: implications for genetics research.

Authors:  Janine M Simmons; Kevin J Quinn
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 4.  Genetic susceptibility to ischemic stroke.

Authors:  James F Meschia; Bradford B Worrall; Stephen S Rich
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 5.  Missing heritability of complex diseases: Enlightenment by genetic variants from intermediate phenotypes.

Authors:  Adrián Blanco-Gómez; Sonia Castillo-Lluva; María Del Mar Sáez-Freire; Lourdes Hontecillas-Prieto; Jian Hua Mao; Andrés Castellanos-Martín; Jesus Pérez-Losada
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Heritability of acoustic startle magnitude, prepulse inhibition, and startle latency in schizophrenia and control families.

Authors:  Wendy Hasenkamp; Michael P Epstein; Amanda Green; Lisette Wilcox; William Boshoven; Barbara Lewison; Erica Duncan
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  New linkage findings in affective disorders.

Authors:  E S Gershon
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci       Date:  1989

Review 8.  Electrophysiological Endophenotypes for Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Emily M Owens; Peter Bachman; David C Glahn; Carrie E Bearden
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 9.  Relating human genetic variation to variation in drug responses.

Authors:  Ashraf G Madian; Heather E Wheeler; Richard Baker Jones; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 10.  Arguments for the sake of endophenotypes: examining common misconceptions about the use of endophenotypes in psychiatric genetics.

Authors:  David C Glahn; Emma E M Knowles; D Reese McKay; Emma Sprooten; Henriette Raventós; John Blangero; Irving I Gottesman; Laura Almasy
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.