| Literature DB >> 34651412 |
Jung-Ho Noh1,2, Ji-Seong Jeong1, Sang-Jin Park1, Kyung Jin Jung1, Byoung-Seok Lee1, Woo-Jin Kim1, Ji-Seok Han1, Min-Kyung Cho1, Dong Kyung Sung3, So Yoon Ahn3, Yun Sil Chang3,4, Hwa-Young Son2, Eun Ju Jeong1.
Abstract
Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a type of brain injury affecting approximately 1 million newborn babies per year worldwide, the only treatment for which is therapeutic hypothermia. Thrombin-preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exert neuroprotective effects by enriching cargo contents and boosting exosome biogenesis, thus showing promise as a new therapeutic strategy for HIE. This study was conducted to evaluate the tissue distribution and potential toxicity of thrombin-preconditioned human Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (th-hWJMSCs) in animal models before the initiation of clinical trials. We investigated the biodistribution, tumorigenicity and general toxicity of th-hWJMSCs. MSCs were administered the maximum feasible dose (1 × 105 cells/10 µL/head) once, or at lower doses into the cerebral ventricle. To support the clinical use of th-hWJMSCs for treating brain injury, preclinical safety studies were conducted in newborn Sprague-Dawley rats and BALB/c nude mice. In addition, growth parameters were evaluated to assess the impact of th-hWJMSCs on the growth of newborn babies. Our results suggest that th-hWJMSCs are non-toxic and non-tumorigenic in rodent models, survive for up to 7 days in the brain and hold potential for HIE therapy.Entities:
Keywords: disease; hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy; mesenchymal stem cell transplantation; newborn; toxicology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34651412 PMCID: PMC8581315 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Comparison of physical development among the four groups in subchronic general toxicity study
| Parameters | 0 cells/head | 1 × 104 cells/head | 3 × 104 cells/head | 1 × 105 cells/head |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex: Male | ||||
| Fur development | 8.00 ± 0.00 | 8.00 ± 0.00 | 8.00 ± 0.00 | 8.00 ± 0.00 |
| Incisor eruption | 10.10 ± 0.32 | 10.50 ± 0.53 | 10.30 ± 0.48 | 10.30 ± 0.48 |
| Eyelid opening | 13.90 ± 0.32 | 13.90 ± 0.57 | 13.60 ± 1.07 | 13.70 ± 0.82 |
| Sex: Female | ||||
| Fur Development | 8.00 ± 0.00 | 8.00 ± 0.00 | 8.00 ± 0.00 | 8.00 ± 0.00 |
| Incisor Eruption | 10.10 ± 0.32 | 10.20 ± 0.42 | 10.10 ± 0.32 | 10.40 ± 0.52 |
| Eyelid Opening | 13.60 ± 0.70 | 13.80 ± 0.42 | 13.70 ± 0.82 | 13.60 ± 0.70 |
Values are post‐natal day (PND) mean ± standard error of 10 rats/sex/group. The evaluation of fur development, incisor eruption and eyelid opening began on PND 8, PND 10 and PND 12, respectively.
Comparison of behavioural function test among the four groups in subchronic general toxicity study
| Parameters | 0 cells/head | 1 × 104 cells/head | 3 × 104 cells/head | 1 × 105 cells/head |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex: Male | ||||
| Negative geotaxis | 10.10 ± 0.32 | 10.20 ± 0.42 | 10.00 ± 0.00 | 10.00 ± 0.00 |
| Traction test | 15.30 ± 0.48 | 15.80 ± 1.03 | 15.70 ± 0.95 | 16.00 ± 0.94 |
| Pupillary reflex | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 |
| Acoustic startle response | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 |
| Rotating rod test | 23.50 ± 0.71 | 23.60 ± 0.84 | 23.30 ± 0.67 | 23.60 ± 0.70 |
| Sex: Female | ||||
| Negative geotaxis | 10.10 ± 0.32 | 10.00 ± 0.00 | 10.00 ± 0.00 | 10.20 ± 0.42 |
| Traction test | 16.30 ± 1.64 | 15.80 ± 1.32 | 16.00 ± 1.33 | 15.70 ± 0.82 |
| Pupillary reflex | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 |
| Acoustic startle response | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 | 22.00 ± 0.00 |
| Rotating rod test | 23.30 ± 0.48 | 23.20 ± 0.42 | 23.60 ± 0.70 | 24.10 ± 0.74 |
Values are post‐natal day (PND) mean ± standard error of 10 rats/sex/group. The evaluation of negative geotaxis, traction test, acoustic startle response, pupillary reflex and rotating rod test began on PND 10, PND 15, PND 22 and PND 22, respectively.
Comparison of lymphocyte phenotyping analysis among the four groups in subchronic general toxicity study
| Cell population (Phenotype) | 0 cells/head | 1 × 104 cells/head | 3 × 104 cells/head | 1 × 105 cells/head |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex: Male | ||||
| Total T cells (CD3+) | 52.26 ± 4.85 | 51.14 ± 6.46 | 49.18 ± 3.87 | 52.47 ± 2.24 |
| Th cells (CD3+ CD4+) | 37.51 ± 4.45 | 34.72 ± 5.83 | 34.41 ± 3.41 | 36.23 ± 2.37 |
| Tc cells (CD3+ CD8+) | 14.71 ± 1.09 | 16.94 ± 1.22 | 14.91 ± 0.86 | 16.35 ± 1.36 |
| Ratio (CD4:CD8) | 2.56 | 2.05 | 2.31 | 2.23 |
| B cells (CD3− CD45RA+) | 45.18 ± 4.67 | 42.96 ± 5.38 | 46.87 ± 3.53 | 44.70 ± 2.91 |
| NK cells (CD3‐ CD161a+) | 0.97 ± 0.22 | 0.95 ± 0.30 | 0.82 ± 0.23 | 0.89 ± 0.22 |
| Sex: Female | ||||
| Total T cells (CD3+) | 55.13 ± 8.24 | 55.25 ± 8.17 | 54.28 ± 5.51 | 55.62 ± 4.86 |
| Th cells (CD3+ CD4+) | 39.87 ± 4.71 | 40.05 ± 5.48 | 39.18 ± 4.62 | 38.45 ± 3.91 |
| Tc cells (CD3+ CD8+) | 15.48 ± 4.09 | 15.43 ± 3.89 | 15.24 ± 3.42 | 17.29 ± 2.23 |
| Ratio (CD4:CD8) | 2.71 | 2.71 | 2.73 | 2.25 |
| B cells (CD3− CD45RA+) | 41.63 ± 7.45 | 41.19 ± 7.13 | 42.83 ± 4.90 | 40.83 ± 5.28 |
| NK cells (CD3− CD161a+) | 1.12 ± 0.28 | 1.09 ± 0.33 | 1.42 ± 0.69 | 1.02 ± 0.15 |
Values are percentage mean ± standard error of 5 rats/sex/group. The lymphocyte phenotyping analysis was conducted on PND 57.
Tc cells, cytotoxic T cells; Th cells, helper T cells.
Dunnett's test significant at the 0.05 level.
FIGURE 1Comparison of motor activity between the four groups in subchronic general toxicity study. The motor activity on PND 39–45 was measured every 10 min for 1 h with Etho Vision XT Version 8.5 (Noldus Information Technology B.V., Wageningen, Netherlands). (A, B): mean distanced moved (cm). (C, D) mean moving speed (cm/sec). (E, F) mean freezing time (sec)
FIGURE 2Tissue distribution of human Alu gene determined with real‐time PCR after ICV injection of 1 × 105 cells/10 µL/head in HIE disease animals. (A) Relative mean number of copies of human Alu gene in brain of rats. (B) Relative mean number of copies of human Alu gene in spinal cord of rats. No human Alu gene was detected in the spinal cord of male rats from Day 1
FIGURE 3Immunohistochemistry in the lymphoma tissues with a human‐specific anti‐mitochondria antibody in tumorigenicity study. (A) Negative control tissue (spleen), (B) Positive control tissue (U87MG injection site, brain), (C) Lymphoma tissue (spleen), (D) Lymphoma tissue (liver), (E) Lymphoma tissue (lung), (F) Lymphoma tissue (kidney). Human‐specific anti‐mitochondria antibody showed positively stained U87MG tumour cells in brain of the positive control tissue (B). On the other hand, negative results for anti‐mitochondria antibody were observed from the malignant lymphoma tissues (C, D, E, F)
FIGURE 4Immunohistochemistry in the lymphoma tissues with a mouse‐specific anti‐cyclophilin A antibody in tumorigenicity study. (A) Negative control tissue (U87MG injection site, brain), (B) Positive control tissue (spleen), (C) Lymphoma tissue (spleen), (D) Lymphoma tissue (liver), (E) Lymphoma tissue (lung), (F) Lymphoma tissue (kidney). Mouse‐specific anti‐cyclophilin A antibody showed negatively stained U87MG tumour cells in brain (B). On the other hand, anti‐cyclophilin A antibody showed positively stained the malignant lymphoma tissues (C, D, E, F)