Literature DB >> 34649841

Care of men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants.

Rachel Horton1,2, Paul Pharoah3, Judith Hayward4,5, Anneke Lucassen1,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34649841      PMCID: PMC7612259          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n2376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
Around 1 in 260 men (~0.4%) inherits a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant that increases their risk of developing prostate, pancreatic and breast cancer and may affect the health of their family(1, 2). Most of these men are currently unaware that they have a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant, but as genetic testing becomes more common, more men will need medical advice about what having such a variant means for them and their families. Men are just as likely as women to have a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant, but many people perceive these variants as only being relevant to women. Paradoxically, this could lead to women at very high risk of breast and ovarian cancer missing out on screening and risk-lowering treatment despite a concerning paternal family history. Clinicians might also be less attuned to paternal family history of cancer in assessing women’s breast cancer risk(3). This practice pointer covers what cancer-predisposing BRCA variants are; who might be tested; and what health issues men and their clinicians need to know about. We refer to men but this article may also apply to some transgender and non-binary people: their risk profiles and recommended care should be appropriately individualised.

What are cancer-predisposing BRCA variants?

BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumour suppressor genes that code for DNA repair proteins. Certain variants in these genes predispose to cancer (primarily breast, ovarian, prostate and pancreatic, and for BRCA2 possibly melanoma(4)). The predisposition to cancer is inherited in an autosomal dominant way i.e. each and every time a person with a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant has a child, they have a 1 in 2 or 50:50 chance of passing their BRCA variant onto the child. This is the case regardless of whether parent or child is male or female. Many men and some women with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants will never develop an associated cancer, as shown in Figure 1. The cancer risks associated with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants are modified by lifestyle factors and other inherited genetic variants. Polygenic risk scores (calculated by looking at multiple common genetic variants across the genome, each with a tiny individual effect) show potential to refine cancer risk predictions for people with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants, but cannot remove uncertainty as to whether a given patient will or will not develop cancer(5).
Figure 1

Cancer risks associated with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants

Please note cumulative cancer risks are shown on different scales

*Cancer-predisposing BRCA1 variants also increase pancreatic cancer risk (relative risk 4.11)(8) but data are emerging and cumulative risk figures are not readily available.

Female breast and ovary data from Kuchenbaecker et al. 2017(9); prostate from Nyberg et al. 2020(10); male breast from Tai et al. 2007(11); and pancreatic cancer from van Asperen et al. 2005(12). Population data are for England and Wales 2016 (from Office for National Statistics).

Thousands of different variants within the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been described, and classifying which are benign and which increase cancer risk can be challenging(6). As more data are gathered, classifications may shift. For example a Canadian laboratory examined the BRCA variants they identified over a five year period and found that 12% were reclassified (75% of these were downgraded – i.e. they are now thought to be less likely to predispose to cancer than they were when the BRCA test was originally done)(7). Diagnostic tests involve sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (and perhaps other genes, e.g. PALB2), aiming to detect any variant present that might increase cancer risk.

How would a man find out that he has a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant?

In the UK, diagnostic BRCA testing is currently offered to people with a 10% or greater chance of having a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant(15). Most diagnostic BRCA tests are done for women, but some men will find out their BRCA status via this route, as men with breast cancer at any age are eligible to be tested(16), and some men with prostate or pancreatic cancer may have testing to determine eligibility for PARP inhibitors (often in the context of clinical trials). More commonly, men are offered targeted BRCA testing after a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant is identified in their family. Usually this will be predictive testing (i.e. the man has no personal medical history suggestive of a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant), though occasionally it may be explanatory (e.g. in men known to have prostate cancer). The laboratory would need details of the specific cancer-predisposing BRCA variant in the man’s family in order to test for it (e.g. a genetic report from an affected family member) and such targeted testing would not detect any other cancer-predisposing variants. Around 1.5% of patients with prostate cancer have a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant(17), but a personal medical history of prostate cancer is not an indication for diagnostic BRCA testing in the UK. However, for patients with younger-onset, aggressive disease, a thorough family history can explore the possibility of a familial cancer-predisposing BRCA variant. A family history that includes, for example, bilateral breast cancer, male breast cancer, or multiple people affected by breast or ovarian cancer (especially at younger ages), probably warrants discussion with your local genetics service. Some men might access BRCA testing outside standard clinical pathways, such as through direct-to-consumer genetic testing or research studies(18). These tests are of variable quality and scope, and further scrutiny may be needed to confirm that the variant is really present or really represents a risk(19).

Case studies

Cancer-predisposing BRCA variants increase the risk of aggressive prostate cancer

Rahul is a 40-year-old man who had a test via a genetics clinic for the cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variant identified in his aunt. Rahul was also found to have the cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variant and is concerned about developing prostate cancer. He books an appointment with you to discuss PSA screening. Men with cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants like Rahul have an increased risk of prostate cancer: a recent meta-analysis indicated an odds ratio of 2.64(17), and a large prospective cohort study in the UK and Ireland found a 27% absolute risk of developing prostate cancer by age 75, rising to 60% by age 85(10) (for comparison, population risk by age 85 is 16% in England and Wales based on Office for National Statistics 2016 data). When prostate cancer does occur in a man with a cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variant, it tends to be more aggressive(20). The evidence has been inconsistent regarding the impact of cancer-predisposing BRCA1 variants on prostate cancer but a subtler effect is probable, with an odds ratio of 1.35(17), and the relative risk increase is higher at younger ages(21, 22). The IMPACT study is an ongoing international prospective cohort study of more than 3,000 men to examine the use of PSA screening in men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants. Based on interim results, the researchers recommend that men with cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants are offered systematic PSA screening(23). This is because after three years of PSA screening, men with cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants proved to have a higher incidence of prostate cancer, were younger at diagnosis, and were more likely to have clinically significant tumours. The positive predictive value of a PSA >3.0 ng/ml was higher in men with cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants than in controls (31% vs 18%). Discuss with Rahul the pros and cons of PSA screening and be clear about the current limits of medical knowledge. It would be appropriate to include in this discussion that if prostate cancer does develop in a man with a cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variant, it is more likely to be clinically significant. Interim analysis from the IMPACT study shows that after four screening rounds (annual PSA) for men aged 55-69 with cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants, you would expect to detect one clinically significant prostate cancer for every 13 men screened(23). The European Association of Urology recommends offering PSA based prostate cancer screening to men with cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants who have been counselled on the potential risks and benefits of screening from the age of 40 although they do not specify a screening interval(24). It is not yet known whether PSA screening will reduce mortality from prostate cancer in men with cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants. Research is ongoing as to the role of PSA screening for men with cancer-predisposing BRCA1 variants: an interim analysis found no differences in age or tumour characteristics between men with cancer-predisposing BRCA1 variants and controls(23).

Breast awareness is important for men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants

Jakob is a 50-year-old man who books an appointment to discuss a painless ‘cyst’ near his left nipple that he noticed several months ago. On examination, you notice that he has an inverted nipple and ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathy. You ask about his family history and he tells you that his father died of prostate cancer in his sixties. Men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants have an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer: 8.3% for BRCA2 and 1.8% for BRCA1, compared to 0.1% in the general population(11). As in women, breast cancer in men most commonly presents as a painless mass. Although nipple involvement tends to be seen earlier due to the smaller amount of breast tissue(25), male breast cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage(25). Men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants are at higher risk of developing breast cancer, but any man with symptoms of breast cancer warrants urgent referral to a breast clinic in the same way women presenting with concerning symptoms would be referred, regardless of BRCA status. Evidence regarding breast cancer characteristics in men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants is very limited. Two studies analysing tumour grading, staging and receptor status in men with breast cancer suggest that cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants are associated with more aggressive cancers(26, 27). Evidence is also lacking on breast cancer screening in men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants and practice varies(28). In the UK, men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants are advised to be breast aware, i.e. to know how their breasts usually look and feel, and seek medical advice if they notice changes or have any concerns. Men might be more likely to delay seeking care for a new breast lump, perhaps waiting until the lump becomes painful or changes the overlying skin. A study in Hong Kong of men with breast cancer found that median duration from symptoms to first medical consultation was 12.4 months, and 84% were not aware (before their diagnosis) that breast cancer could occur in men(29). Raising this issue may be challenging, particularly since resources promoting breast awareness are mainly aimed at women(30). Our hospital Patient and Public Involvement group highlighted some of the issues men might face during and after receiving a breast cancer diagnosis, for example being the only man in the waiting room for appointments.

Patients may be unaware that cancer-predisposing BRCA variants can be passed on by men

Harry is a 55-year-old man who you see regularly regarding his poorly controlled diabetes. At the end of an appointment discussing his blood sugars, he mentions that his sister in Australia has recently told him that she “has BRCA” and that he should get tested. You ask how he feels about this and he says he can’t see the point because “isn’t BRCA a female thing?” Harry has two daughters in their thirties. Because cancer-predisposing BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants are notorious for increasing lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer in women, there is a common misperception that cancer-predisposing BRCA variants themselves only occur in women(31). Cancer-predisposing BRCA variants are just as common in men as they are in women, but are less likely to be detected because they are less likely to cause a cancer that prompts genetic testing. Explain that men and women inherit these genetic variants in the same way: that any child of a parent with a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant has a 50:50 chance of inheriting that variant. This would include Harry’s children if Harry also has the BRCA variant identified in his sister. For some men, concern for the health of existing or potential future daughters or granddaughters is a key motivation for seeking BRCA testing(31, 32). In contrast, sometimes men are reluctant to have BRCA testing because they are concerned about potentially having passed a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant onto their children. They might prefer not to know than to have this possibility confirmed. It may help to remind them that the cancer-predisposing BRCA variant has likely been in their family for generations and whether they inherited or passed it on is outside their control. However, being tested for it might guide medical care for them and their children, for example by informing choices about cancer screening (Figure 2).
Figure 2

A family learning about BRCA

Occasionally, men decide that they do not wish to be tested for the cancer-predisposing BRCA variant found in their family. It would still be appropriate and important to refer their adult, first degree relatives (e.g. siblings or children) to clinical genetics specialists if they wish, even if testing them might (indirectly) reveal that the man has the cancer-predisposing BRCA variant. Clinical genetic services are skilled at counselling patients through difficult psychosocial and ethical issues such as this scenario.

Men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants have an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer

Simon is a 50 year old man who had a test two years ago via a genetics clinic for the cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variant identified in his sister. Simon was also found to have the BRCA2 variant and discussed his increased risk of prostate and pancreatic cancer with a genetic counsellor at the time. Last week, Simon’s friend was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Simon is now more concerned about his risk of pancreatic cancer and books an appointment to discuss it with you. People with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants have an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis of a high-risk breast cancer family registry from the US, Canada and Australia estimated that pancreatic cancer risk is five to six times higher than population risk for people with cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants and around four times higher for people with cancer-predisposing BRCA1 variants(8). Unfortunately pancreatic cancer is challenging to screen for and often advanced by the time symptoms develop. 2018 NICE guidance on pancreatic cancer recommended that people with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants and one or more first degree relatives with pancreatic cancer have surveillance (MRI/MR cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic ultrasound)(33), but this was challenged by the UK Cancer Genetics Group as being premature(34). Instead, the group recommended that pancreatic cancer screening should only be offered within the context of research studies such as EUROPAC(35). In practice, pancreatic cancer screening is generally considered on a case-by-case basis for people with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants if they also have a family history of pancreatic cancer. Screening as part of a research study might be a possibility for Simon – your local genetics service may be able to signpost towards this. This consultation could be a good opportunity to discuss lifestyle factors – people cannot change whether they have a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant, but addressing modifiable factors like smoking and alcohol intake will reduce their risk of developing cancer. Around 6-7% of people with metastatic pancreatic cancer have a germline cancer-predisposing BRCA variant(36). Increasingly, people with pancreatic cancer are offered diagnostic BRCA testing in order to inform treatment plans. Cancer cells with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants already have impaired DNA repair and are heavily reliant on DNA repair pathways involving PARP, so are particularly vulnerable to PARP inhibitors. PARP inhibitors may be a treatment option for people with a germline cancer-predisposing BRCA variant who have breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancer (often in the context of clinical trials)(37). Men and women are equally likely to inherit or pass on a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant – family history of cancers needs to encompass both sides of the family. Men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants have an increased risk of developing breast cancer and are advised to be breast aware. Men with cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants have an increased risk of developing aggressive prostate cancer. Evidence is less clear regarding men with cancer-predisposing BRCA1 variants but they probably also have an increased risk. We don’t yet know whether prostate specific antigen screening reduces mortality in men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants. The European Association of Urology recommends that PSA screening is offered to men with cancer-predisposing BRCA2 variants from 40 years of age after discussion of the risks and benefits. We spoke with men from the Patient and Public Involvement group at University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust to discuss what prior knowledge men might have about cancer-predisposing BRCA variants, what information they might want to know after finding that they had a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant, and what terminology they might prefer when talking about genetic variants. These discussions particularly influenced the case study section, the discussion about expectations in ‘How would a man find out that he has a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant?’, and Box 1: Describing genetic variants. Do you ask about paternal as well as maternal family history when assessing breast cancer risk? What questions might you ask if a man tells you he doesn’t want testing for the cancer-predisposing BRCA variant found in his family? When did you last ask a man about his family history of breast and ovarian cancer? This article was commissioned by the education team. We developed fictitious cases to illustrate common issues that may arise for men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants, based on scenarios encountered by our regional genetics department. We used PubMed, and author research paper archives, to search for information about cancer risks and medical care for men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants. Where available, we aimed to quote cancer risks established by large prospective cohort studies. Medical care of men with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants is under-researched and often guidelines are lacking – in these cases, we have drawn on our context within a UK regional genetics department to aim to reflect UK standard practice. Identification of a cancer-predisposing BRCA variant may raise various ethical issues, for example: Family members may benefit from testing for the cancer-predisposing BRCA variant. What if the person in whom it was identified finds it difficult to tell their family about the variant, or chooses not to? Health professionals may sometimes need to balance the competing tensions of patient confidentiality with the interests others have in knowing about their risks. People with cancer-predisposing BRCA variants have a substantially increased risk of developing certain cancers, but these are adult-onset and some people with such variants will never develop cancer. Classifying BRCA variants as benign or cancer-predisposing is technically challenging. Over time, new evidence may shift our understanding of what a particular variant means (i.e. it may become clear that a variant thought to predispose to cancer is actually benign, or vice versa). How should clinicians respond when this happens?
  27 in total

1.  Cancer risks in BRCA2 families: estimates for sites other than breast and ovary.

Authors:  C J van Asperen; R M Brohet; E J Meijers-Heijboer; N Hoogerbrugge; S Verhoef; H F A Vasen; M G E M Ausems; F H Menko; E B Gomez Garcia; J G M Klijn; F B L Hogervorst; J C van Houwelingen; L J van't Veer; M A Rookus; F E van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Clinical and pathologic characteristics of BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative male breast cancer patients: results from a collaborative multicenter study in Italy.

Authors:  Laura Ottini; Valentina Silvestri; Piera Rizzolo; Mario Falchetti; Ines Zanna; Calogero Saieva; Giovanna Masala; Simonetta Bianchi; Siranoush Manoukian; Monica Barile; Paolo Peterlongo; Liliana Varesco; Stefania Tommasi; Antonio Russo; Giuseppe Giannini; Laura Cortesi; Alessandra Viel; Marco Montagna; Paolo Radice; Domenico Palli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  The association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations with prostate cancer risk, frequency, and mortality: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mok Oh; Nasser Alkhushaym; Saad Fallatah; Abdulhamid Althagafi; Rana Aljadeed; Yazed Alsowaida; Joanne Jeter; Jennifer R Martin; Hani M Babiker; Ali McBride; Ivo Abraham
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 4.  The diagnosis of male breast cancer.

Authors:  M N Nofal; A J Yousef
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.422

5.  "How do we rally around the one who was positive?" Familial uncertainty management in the context of men managing BRCA-related cancer risks.

Authors:  Emily A Rauscher; Marleah Dean; Gemme Campbell-Salome; Joshua B Barbour
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Delayed presentation, diagnosis, and psychosocial aspects of male breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael Co; Andrea Lee; Ava Kwong
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Rachel Horton; Gillian Crawford; Lindsey Freeman; Angela Fenwick; Caroline F Wright; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-10-16

8.  Interim Results from the IMPACT Study: Evidence for Prostate-specific Antigen Screening in BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Page; Elizabeth K Bancroft; Mark N Brook; Melissa Assel; Mona Hassan Al Battat; Sarah Thomas; Natalie Taylor; Anthony Chamberlain; Jennifer Pope; Holly Ni Raghallaigh; D Gareth Evans; Jeanette Rothwell; Lovise Maehle; Eli Marie Grindedal; Paul James; Lyon Mascarenhas; Joanne McKinley; Lucy Side; Tessy Thomas; Christi van Asperen; Hans Vasen; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Janneke Ringelberg; Thomas Dyrsø Jensen; Palle J S Osther; Brian T Helfand; Elena Genova; Rogier A Oldenburg; Cezary Cybulski; Dominika Wokolorczyk; Kai-Ren Ong; Camilla Huber; Jimmy Lam; Louise Taylor; Monica Salinas; Lidia Feliubadaló; Jan C Oosterwijk; Wendy van Zelst-Stams; Jackie Cook; Derek J Rosario; Susan Domchek; Jacquelyn Powers; Saundra Buys; Karen O'Toole; Margreet G E M Ausems; Rita K Schmutzler; Kerstin Rhiem; Louise Izatt; Vishakha Tripathi; Manuel R Teixeira; Marta Cardoso; William D Foulkes; Armen Aprikian; Heleen van Randeraad; Rosemarie Davidson; Mark Longmuir; Mariëlle W G Ruijs; Apollonia T J M Helderman van den Enden; Muriel Adank; Rachel Williams; Lesley Andrews; Declan G Murphy; Dorothy Halliday; Lisa Walker; Annelie Liljegren; Stefan Carlsson; Ashraf Azzabi; Irene Jobson; Catherine Morton; Kylie Shackleton; Katie Snape; Helen Hanson; Marion Harris; Marc Tischkowitz; Amy Taylor; Judy Kirk; Rachel Susman; Rakefet Chen-Shtoyerman; Allan Spigelman; Nicholas Pachter; Munaza Ahmed; Teresa Ramon Y Cajal; Janez Zgajnar; Carole Brewer; Neus Gadea; Angela F Brady; Theo van Os; David Gallagher; Oskar Johannsson; Alan Donaldson; Julian Barwell; Nicola Nicolai; Eitan Friedman; Elias Obeid; Lynn Greenhalgh; Vedang Murthy; Lucia Copakova; Sibel Saya; John McGrath; Peter Cooke; Karina Rønlund; Kate Richardson; Alex Henderson; Soo H Teo; Banu Arun; Karin Kast; Alexander Dias; Neil K Aaronson; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Chris H Bangma; Elena Castro; David Dearnaley; Diana M Eccles; Karen Tricker; Jorunn Eyfjord; Alison Falconer; Christopher Foster; Henrik Gronberg; Freddie C Hamdy; Vigdis Stefansdottir; Vincent Khoo; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Jan Lubinski; Karol Axcrona; Christos Mikropoulos; Anita Mitra; Clare Moynihan; Gadi Rennert; Mohnish Suri; Penny Wilson; Tim Dudderidge; Judith Offman; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Andrew Vickers; Hans Lilja; Rosalind A Eeles
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elena Castro; Chee Goh; David Olmos; Ed Saunders; Daniel Leongamornlert; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Nadiya Mahmud; Tokhir Dadaev; Koveela Govindasami; Michelle Guy; Emma Sawyer; Rosemary Wilkinson; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Steve Ellis; Debra Frost; Susan Peock; D Gareth Evans; Marc Tischkowitz; Trevor Cole; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Carole Brewer; Fiona Douglas; Mary E Porteous; Alan Donaldson; Huw Dorkins; Louise Izatt; Jackie Cook; Shirley Hodgson; M John Kennedy; Lucy E Side; Jacqueline Eason; Alex Murray; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Prostate Cancer Risks for Male BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tommy Nyberg; Debra Frost; Daniel Barrowdale; D Gareth Evans; Elizabeth Bancroft; Julian Adlard; Munaza Ahmed; Julian Barwell; Angela F Brady; Carole Brewer; Jackie Cook; Rosemarie Davidson; Alan Donaldson; Jacqueline Eason; Helen Gregory; Alex Henderson; Louise Izatt; M John Kennedy; Claire Miller; Patrick J Morrison; Alex Murray; Kai-Ren Ong; Mary Porteous; Caroline Pottinger; Mark T Rogers; Lucy Side; Katie Snape; Lisa Walker; Marc Tischkowitz; Rosalind Eeles; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.