Literature DB >> 3464798

Risk factors for invasive cervical cancer among Latinas and non-Latinas in Los Angeles County.

R K Peters, D Thomas, D G Hagan, T M Mack, B E Henderson.   

Abstract

A case-control study among white women in Los Angeles County was conducted to investigate etiologic factors that might explain the high rates of invasive cervical cancer among Latinas. Two hundred patients with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix and matched (age, sex, preferred language, and neighborhood) controls were interviewed, 98 pairs in English and 102 pairs in Spanish. Seven factors were found to contribute independently and significantly (P less than .01) to risk, each after adjustment for the other six: years since last Pap smear, years of education (protective), frequency-years douching, pack-years of smoking, years of barrier contraceptive use (protective), number of sexual partners before age 20, and recognized episodes of genital warts. An eighth variable, interval in years between menarche and first intercourse, was the second variable to enter the stepwise logistic regression analysis but lost its statistical significance when sexual partners before age 20 entered the model. Together, these eight variables accounted for almost 99% of the risk. There were no significant interactions between any of these variables and age, language of interview, or birth in a Latin country. There was no increased risk associated with use of oral contraceptives, either before or after adjustment for the other significant factors. Compared to English-speaking controls, Spanish-speaking controls smoked less, douched less, had fewer sexual partners before 20, and had essentially the same average interval between menarche and first intercourse and the same average number of episodes of genital warts; however, they had had a longer interval since their last Pap smear, fewer years of barrier contraceptive use, and fewer years of education. Education, presumably a correlate of an inadequately measured etiologic risk factor (possibly papillomavirus infection), was responsible for the greatest difference in risk between the Spanish- and English-speaking cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Americas; Behavior; Biology; California; Cancer; Cervical Cancer; Contraception; Contraceptive Usage; Control Groups; Cultural Background; Data Analysis; Data Collection; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diseases; Economic Factors; Educational Status; Ethnic Groups; Family Planning; Incidence; Infections; Measurement; Neoplasms; North America; Northern America; Population; Population Characteristics; Prevalence; Research Methodology; Risk Factors; Sex Behavior; Smoking; Socioeconomic Factors; Socioeconomic Status; Statistical Regression; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3464798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  23 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal douching: evidence for risks or benefits to women's health.

Authors:  Jenny L Martino; Sten H Vermund
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Cervical cancer incidence and mortality in New Mexico's Hispanics, American Indians, and non-Hispanic whites.

Authors:  T M Becker; C M Wheeler; C R Key; J M Samet
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1992-04

Review 3.  Systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses: part 6 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Meike Ressing; Maria Blettner; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Vaginal douching and adverse health effects: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Zhang; A G Thomas; E Leybovich
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Vaginal douching and reduced fertility.

Authors:  D D Baird; C R Weinberg; L F Voigt; J R Daling
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Accuracy of women's self-report of their last Pap smear.

Authors:  J A Sawyer; J A Earp; R H Fletcher; F F Daye; T M Wynn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Perceived risk of cervical cancer in Appalachian women.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Amy K Ferketich; Mack T Ruffin Iv; Cathy Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2012-11

8.  Racial differences in cervical cancer mortality in Chicago.

Authors:  E J Samelson; M A Speers; R Ferguson; C Bennett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Decreasing rates of cervical cancer among American Indians and Hispanics in New Mexico (United States).

Authors:  A Chao; T M Becker; S W Jordan; R Darling; F D Gilliland; C R Key
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Why do women douche? Results from a qualitative study.

Authors:  J A Gazmararian; F C Bruce; J S Kendrick; C C Grace; S Wynn
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2001-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.