Literature DB >> 34644179

Inducing neuroplasticity through intracranial θ-burst stimulation in the human sensorimotor cortex.

Jose L Herrero1,2, Alexander Smith2, Akash Mishra1,2, Noah Markowitz1,2, Ashesh D Mehta1,2, Stephan Bickel1,2,3.   

Abstract

The progress of therapeutic neuromodulation greatly depends on improving stimulation parameters to most efficiently induce neuroplasticity effects. Intermittent θ-burst stimulation (iTBS), a form of electrical stimulation that mimics natural brain activity patterns, has proved to efficiently induce such effects in animal studies and rhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation studies in humans. However, little is known about the potential neuroplasticity effects of iTBS applied through intracranial electrodes in humans. This study characterizes the physiological effects of intracranial iTBS in humans and compare them with α-frequency stimulation, another frequently used neuromodulatory pattern. We applied these two stimulation patterns to well-defined regions in the sensorimotor cortex, which elicited contralateral hand muscle contractions during clinical mapping, in patients with epilepsy implanted with intracranial electrodes. Treatment effects were evaluated using oscillatory coherence across areas connected to the treatment site, as defined with corticocortical-evoked potentials. Our results show that iTBS increases coherence in the β-frequency band within the sensorimotor network indicating a potential neuroplasticity effect. The effect is specific to the sensorimotor system, the β band, and the stimulation pattern and outlasted the stimulation period by ∼3 min. The effect occurred in four out of seven subjects depending on the buildup of the effect during iTBS treatment and other patterns of oscillatory activity related to ceiling effects within the β band and to preexistent coherence within the α band. By characterizing the neurophysiological effects of iTBS within well-defined cortical networks, we hope to provide an electrophysiological framework that allows clinicians/researchers to optimize brain stimulation protocols which may have translational value.NEW & NOTEWORTHY θ-Burst stimulation (TBS) protocols in transcranial magnetic stimulation studies have shown improved treatment efficacy in a variety of neuropsychiatric disorders. The optimal protocol to induce neuroplasticity in invasive direct electrical stimulation approaches is not known. We report that intracranial TBS applied in human sensorimotor cortex increases local coherence of preexistent β rhythms. The effect is specific to the stimulation frequency and the stimulated network and outlasts the stimulation period by ∼3 min.

Entities:  

Keywords:  direct electrical brain stimulation; iTBS; intracranial EEG; neuronal plasticity; β oscillations in sensorimotor cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34644179      PMCID: PMC8782667          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00320.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  89 in total

Review 1.  Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lindsay Oberman; Dylan Edwards; Mark Eldaief; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.177

2.  The effects of direct brain stimulation in humans depend on frequency, amplitude, and white-matter proximity.

Authors:  Uma R Mohan; Andrew J Watrous; Jonathan F Miller; Bradley C Lega; Michael R Sperling; Gregory A Worrell; Robert E Gross; Kareem A Zaghloul; Barbara C Jobst; Kathryn A Davis; Sameer A Sheth; Joel M Stein; Sandhitsu R Das; Richard Gorniak; Paul A Wanda; Daniel S Rizzuto; Michael J Kahana; Joshua Jacobs
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Induction and Quantification of Excitability Changes in Human Cortical Networks.

Authors:  Corey J Keller; Yuhao Huang; Jose L Herrero; Maria E Fini; Victor Du; Fred A Lado; Christopher J Honey; Ashesh D Mehta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural mechanisms of transient neocortical beta rhythms: Converging evidence from humans, computational modeling, monkeys, and mice.

Authors:  Maxwell A Sherman; Shane Lee; Robert Law; Saskia Haegens; Catherine A Thorn; Matti S Hämäläinen; Christopher I Moore; Stephanie R Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Modulation of epileptic activity by deep brain stimulation: a model-based study of frequency-dependent effects.

Authors:  Faten Mina; Pascal Benquet; Anca Pasnicu; Arnaud Biraben; Fabrice Wendling
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 6.  Multi-Scale Computational Models for Electrical Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Hyeon Seo; Sung C Jun
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Functional electrical stimulation therapy for restoration of motor function after spinal cord injury and stroke: a review.

Authors:  Cesar Marquez-Chin; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Frequency-dependent effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  Dongning Su; Huimin Chen; Wanli Hu; Yuye Liu; Zhan Wang; Xuemei Wang; Genliang Liu; Huizi Ma; Junhong Zhou; Tao Feng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Electrocorticographic dissociation of alpha and beta rhythmic activity in the human sensorimotor system.

Authors:  Arjen Stolk; Loek Brinkman; Mariska J Vansteensel; Erik Aarnoutse; Frans Ss Leijten; Chris H Dijkerman; Robert T Knight; Floris P de Lange; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  Understanding the Role of Sensorimotor Beta Oscillations.

Authors:  Jacopo Barone; Holly E Rossiter
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.