Literature DB >> 34643942

Influence function methods to assess the effectiveness of influenza vaccine with survey data.

Mingmei Tian1, Jihnhee Yu1, Denise F Lillvis2,3,4, Albert Vexler1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine a robust relative risk (RR) estimation for survey data analysis with ideal inferential properties under various model assumptions. DATA SOURCES: We employed secondary data from the Household Component of the 2000-2016 US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). STUDY
DESIGN: We investigate a broad range of data-balancing techniques by implementing influence function (IF) methods, which allows us to easily estimate the variability for the RR estimates in the complex survey setting. We conduct a simulation study of seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness to evaluate these approaches and discuss techniques that show robust inferential performance across model assumptions. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Demographic information, vaccine status, and self-administered questionnaire surveys were obtained from the longitudinal data files. We linked this information with medical condition files and medical event to extract the disease type and associated expenditures for each medical visit. We excluded individuals who were 18 years or younger at the beginning of each panel. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Under various model assumptions, the IF methods show robust inferential performance when the data-balancing procedures are incorporated. Once IF methods and data-balancing techniques are implemented, contingency table-based RR estimation yields a comparable result to the generalized linear model approach. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed methods for complex survey data using 2000-2016 MEPS data. When employing these methods, we find a significant, negative association between vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates and influenza-incurred expenditures.
CONCLUSIONS: We describe and demonstrate a robust method for RR estimation and relevant inferences for influenza vaccine effectiveness using MEPS data. The proposed method is flexible and can be extended to weighted data for survey data analysis. Hence, these methods have great potential for health services research, especially when data are nonexperimental and imbalanced.
© 2021 Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biostatistical methods; healthcare surveys; influenza vaccines; medical expenditures; risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34643942      PMCID: PMC8763297          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  33 in total

1.  When to use the odds ratio or the relative risk?

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Thomas Kohlmann
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 2.  Factors affecting immune responses to the influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Maria R Castrucci
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A critical issue of using the variance of the total in the linearization method - In the context of unequal probability sampling.

Authors:  Jihnhee Yu; Albert Vexler; Kabir Jalal
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Observational studies and the difficult quest for causality: lessons from vaccine effectiveness and impact studies.

Authors:  Marc Lipsitch; Ayan Jha; Lone Simonsen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  General relative risk regression models for epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar; D J Venzon
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Cost Benefit of High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in a Long-Term Care Population During an A/H1N1-Predominant Influenza Season.

Authors:  Theresa I Shireman; Jessica Ogarek; Pedro Gozalo; Tingting Zhang; Vincent Mor; H Edward Davidson; Lisa Han; Monica Taljaard; Stefan Gravenstein
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.669

7.  Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys.

Authors:  Eva H Dugoff; Megan Schuler; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Influence function methods to assess the effectiveness of influenza vaccine with survey data.

Authors:  Mingmei Tian; Jihnhee Yu; Denise F Lillvis; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Use of stabilized inverse propensity scores as weights to directly estimate relative risk and its confidence intervals.

Authors:  Stanley Xu; Colleen Ross; Marsha A Raebel; Susan Shetterly; Christopher Blanchette; David Smith
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During the 2016-2017 Season.

Authors:  Brendan Flannery; Jessie R Chung; Arnold S Monto; Emily T Martin; Edward A Belongia; Huong Q McLean; Manjusha Gaglani; Kempapura Murthy; Richard K Zimmerman; Mary Patricia Nowalk; Michael L Jackson; Lisa A Jackson; Melissa A Rolfes; Sarah Spencer; Alicia M Fry
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 20.999

View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence function methods to assess the effectiveness of influenza vaccine with survey data.

Authors:  Mingmei Tian; Jihnhee Yu; Denise F Lillvis; Albert Vexler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.402

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.