| Literature DB >> 34642555 |
Sagar Dholariya1, Deepak N Parchwani1, Ragini Singh1, Madhuri Radadiya2, C D S Katoch1.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 is a highly contagious viral infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus, member of coronaviridae family. It causes life threatening complications due to complexity and rapid onset course of the disease. Early identification of high-risk patients who require close monitoring and aggressive treatment remains challengeable till date. Novel biomarkers which help to identify high risk patients at the early stage is high priority. Objective of this review to find utility of P-SEP, sTREM-1 and suPAR for diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infected cases. Soluble receptors like, P-SEP, sTREM-1 and suPAR have been involved in immune regulation in SARS-CoV-2 infection and elevate more in severe cases. A comprehensive research of databases like PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Web of Science was performed for relevant studies. A total of nine out of fifteen research literature in initial screening were included for this review. Interestingly all studies have reported high levels of P-SEP, sTREM-1 and suPAR in SARS-CoV-2 infected cases and the biomarkers positively correlated with severity of infection. This implies that P-SEP, sTREM-1 and suPAR can be implemented as surrogate marker in blood profile for early diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis in SARS-CoV-2 for better management in Indian population at the current situation.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; P-SEP; SARS-CoV-2; Sepsis; sTREM-1; suPAR
Year: 2021 PMID: 34642555 PMCID: PMC8494168 DOI: 10.1007/s12291-021-01008-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Clin Biochem ISSN: 0970-1915
Fig. 1Flow of process for selection of research literature according to the PRISMA guidelines
Summary of data extracted for P-SEP in SARS-COv-2 infection from various studies
| P-SEP in SARS-CoV-2 infection | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Zanninotto M et al. [ | Schirinzi A et al. [ | Fukada A et al.[ |
| Place of study | Padova, Italy | Bari, Italy | Saitama, Japan |
| Sample size | 75 | 134 | 06 |
| Serum level in moderate to severe type of SARS-CoV-2 infection | High | High | High |
| Critical cases vs. Mild / Moderate cases [ng/L Median (Range) or Mean] | 1069.0 (695.0–2299.0) vs. 408.0 (202.0–660.0) | 3024.0 vs. 737.0 | Not mentioned |
| Dead vs. discharged [ng/L median (Range) or Mean] | 1046.0 (763.0–1240.0) vs. 417.0 (281.0–678.0) | 2543.0 vs.727.0 | 626.0(314.0–784.0) vs 307.0 (198.0–352.0) |
| Cut off value | > 250.0 ng/L | > 1179.0 ng/L | Not mentioned |
| AUC for predicting mortality or severity | 0.72 | 0.73 | Not mentioned |
| Correlation with CRP/procalcitonin | Positive correlation | Positive correlation | Positive correlation |
| Able to identify high risk patients and to hospital stay | Yes | Not mentioned | Yes |
| Limitation | Non-availability of sample at admission and limited sample size | Not mentioned | Limited sample size |
Summary of data extracted for suPAR in SARS-COv-2 infection from various studies
| suPAR in SARS-CoV-2 infection | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Rovina N et al. [ | Huang M et al. [ | Kyriazopoul-ou E et al. [ | Azam TQ et al. [ | Chalkias A et al. [ |
| Place of study | Chicago, USA | Fuijan, China | Athens, Greece | Ann Arber, MI | Larisa, Greece |
| Sample size | 57 | 117 | 130 | 352 | Not mentioned |
| Serum level in severe/critical type of SARS-CoV-2 infection | Increased > 6.0 ng/ml | Increased 5.51 ± 2.53 ng/ml | Increased > 6.0 ng/ml | Increased 5.61 ng/ml | Increased |
| Correlation with Severity/Respiratory failure/ Mortality | Positive correlation | Positive correlation | Positive correlation | Positive correlation | Positive correlation |
| Correlation with CRP/D-Dimer/PCT | Positive correlation | Positive correlation | Positive correlation | Positive correlation | No correlation |
| Increased in progressive kidney dysfunction | Yes | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | Yes | Not mentioned |
| Sensitivity for predicting respiratory failure/Mortality | 85.7% | 85.9% | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | > 80% |
Fig. 2Biomarkers of sepsis in different stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection
| Stage | Pathophysiology |
|---|---|
| Asymptomatic phase | In this stage, SARS-CoV-2 virus binds to the highly expressed ACE2 receptor in the nasal epithelial cells. Limited replication of virus for initial couple of days causes local spreading of infection with inadequate immune response. Despite having a low viral load, patients are very contagious throughout this phase [ |
| Invasion into upper respiratory tract | During this stage, the virus spreads to the upper respiratory tract. Cells infected with virus releases interferons and XXCL-10 in the presence of greater immune response. Infection will not spread to advanced stage if individual has enough immune response [ |
| Invasion into lower respiratory tract | In this stage virus invades the type 2 pneumocytes and further replication produces more nucleocapsids. Pneumocytes release of more cytokines like, interleukins, TNF-α, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and CXCL-10, leads to cytokine storm. Attraction and sequestration of CD4 and CD8 cells along with persistent inflammation and viral replication damages pneumocytes 1 and 2, results in diffuse alveolar damage and acute respiratory distress syndrome [ |
| Multi-organ involvement | ACE2 receptors are widely expressed in various organs such as lungs, heart, colon, blood vessels, kidney and liver. This extensive distribution of receptor aggravates multi organ injury and systemic failure. Orf1ab, ORF3a and ORF10 proteins of SARS-CoV-2 attacks β1 chain of hemoglobin, while spike protein and ORF10 have binding affinity to porphyrin. This reduces oxygen and carbon dioxide carrying capacity of hemoglobin. Furthet, activation of coagulation cascade in presence of cytokine storm produces systemic vasculitis which further leads to sepsis and DIC [ |