Literature DB >> 32354367

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) as an early predictor of severe respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Nikoletta Rovina1, Karolina Akinosoglou2, Jesper Eugen-Olsen3, Salim Hayek4, Jochen Reiser5, Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis6,7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Prognosis; Respiratory failure; suPAR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32354367      PMCID: PMC7191969          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02897-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
As of April 1, 2020, 885,689 cases of infections by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) have been recorded worldwide; 44,217 of them have died (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus). At the beginning of the illness, patients may experience low-degree fever or flu-like symptoms, but suddenly, severe respiratory failure (SRF) emerges [1]. Increased circulating levels of D-dimers [1, 2] suggest endothelial activation. Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) that is bound on the endothelium may be cleaved early during the disease course leading to an increase of its soluble counterpart, namely suPAR [3]. If this holds true, then suPAR may be used as an early predictor of the risk of SRF. The Hellenic Sepsis Study Group (HSSG, www.sepsis.gr) is collecting clinical information and serum samples within the first 24 h of admission from patients with infections and at least two signs of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Since March 1, 2020, 57 patients with community-acquired pneumonia and molecular documentation of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory secretions were enrolled. Patients were followed up daily for 14 days; the development of SRF defined as PO2/FiO2 ratio less than 150 requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) or continuous positive airway pressure treatment (CPAP) was recorded. suPAR was measured by an enzyme immunoassay in duplicate (suPARnostic™, ViroGates, Lyngby, Denmark); the lower detection limit was 1.1 ng/ml. Measurements were performed and reported by one technician who was blinded to clinical information. The study endpoint was the prognostic performance of suPAR admission levels for the development of SRF within 14 days. Measured levels were compared to those collected from 15 patients with COVID-19 from the emergency department (ED) of Rush University Medical Center. Thirty-four (59.6%) patients were male and 23 (40.1%) female; the mean ± SD age was 64.0 ± 10.3 years, and the Charlson’s comorbidity index was 2.70 ± 1.80. The mean ± SD admission total neutrophil count was 4414.1 ± 2526.5/mm3; the total lymphocyte count was 1149.1 ± 1131.4/mm3; the C-reactive protein was 73.1 ± 76.4 mg/l. Admission levels of suPAR were significantly greater among patients who eventually developed SRF (Fig. 1a). Circulating levels of suPAR were of the same range as those of the US cohort (Fig. 1b). Receiver operator characteristics curve analysis identified levels ≥ 6 ng/ml as the best predictor for SRF. At that cutoff point, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the prediction of SRF was 85.7%, 91.7%, 85.7%, and 91.7%, respectively. The time to SRF was much shorter among patients with suPAR ≥ 6 ng/ml (Fig. 1c). The only admission variables that were independently associated with the development of SRF were male gender and suPAR ≥ 6 ng/ml (Table 1). A positive association was found between admission suPAR and D-dimers (rs = + 0.777, p < 0.0001).
Fig. 1

suPAR as an early predictor of the development of severe respiratory failure (SRF). a Admission levels of suPAR among Greek patients who eventually developed or not SRF. The p value of comparisons by the Mann-Whitney U test is provided. b Levels of suPAR in patients with COVID-19 and controls. The p value of comparisons by the Mann-Whitney U test is provided. c Time to SRF of Greek patients in relation to the admission levels of suPAR. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio

Table 1

Independent variables at admission associated with the development of severe respiratory failure

No need for MV or CPAP, n (%)Need for MV or CPAP, n (%)Univariate analysisForward Cox regression analysis
OR (95%CIs)p valueHR (95%CIs)p value
Male gender15 (41.7)19 (90.5)0.07 (0.02–0.37)< 0.00017.80 (1.75–34.76)0.007
CCI > 217 (48.6)17 (77.3)7.00 (2.11–24.25)0.002ns
suPAR ≥ 6 ng/ml3 (8.3)18 (85.7)66.00 (12.05–361.35)< 0.000116.43 (4.56–59.19)< 0.0001
Neutrophils ≥ 4200/mm38 (22.2)16 (72.2)11.20 (3.13–40.08)< 0.0001ns
CRP ≥ 58 mg/l7 (19.4)13 (61.9)6.73 (2.01–22.51)0.002ns

CCI Charlson’s comorbidity index, CRP C-reactive protein, CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, OR odds ratio

suPAR as an early predictor of the development of severe respiratory failure (SRF). a Admission levels of suPAR among Greek patients who eventually developed or not SRF. The p value of comparisons by the Mann-Whitney U test is provided. b Levels of suPAR in patients with COVID-19 and controls. The p value of comparisons by the Mann-Whitney U test is provided. c Time to SRF of Greek patients in relation to the admission levels of suPAR. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio Independent variables at admission associated with the development of severe respiratory failure CCI Charlson’s comorbidity index, CRP C-reactive protein, CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, OR odds ratio suPAR has been proposed as a biomarker for the risk of death. An analysis of the TRIAGE III trial in 4420 patients admitted at the ED in Denmark revealed that suPAR ranged between 2.6 and 4.7 ng/ml in 30-day survivors and between 6.7 and 11.8 ng/ml in 30-day non-survivors [4]. Early increase of suPAR has also been reported to be a prediction of 28-day outcome in sepsis [5]. uPAR is bound to the endothelial membrane and functions for the differential signaling between the cleaved and uncleaved forms of kininogen [3]. The positive association between D-dimers and suPAR suggest early complex kininogen and uPAR interactions at the endothelial level of early stages of COVID-19. Higher plasma levels of suPAR are predictive of and potentially causally involved in kidney disease [6] which can be a feature of severe COVID-19 infection. Findings suggest that suPAR may early trace patients who need intensified management probably in need of anti-inflammatory treatment [6]. Whether modification of circulating suPAR is a useful therapeutic option will require further study.
  50 in total

1.  Association of the Circulating Supar Levels with Inflammation, Fibrinolysis, and Outcome in Severe Burn Patients.

Authors:  Jian-Chang Lin; Xiao-Dong Chen; Zhao-Rong Xu; Lin-Wen Zheng; Zhao-Hong Chen
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  suPAR Cut-Offs for Risk Stratification in Patients With Symptoms of COVID-19.

Authors:  Izzet Altintas; Jesper Eugen-Olsen; Santeri Seppälä; Jens Tingleff; Marius Ahm Stauning; Nora Olsen El Caidi; Sanaá Elmajdoubi; Hejdi Gamst-Jensen; Mette B Lindstrøm; Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen; Klaus Tjelle Kristiansen; Christian Rasmussen; Jan O Nehlin; Thomas Kallemose; Harri Hyppölä; Ove Andersen
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2021-08-15

3.  Soluble Urokinase Receptor (SuPAR) in COVID-19-Related AKI.

Authors:  Tariq U Azam; Husam R Shadid; Pennelope Blakely; Patrick O'Hayer; Hanna Berlin; Michael Pan; Peiyao Zhao; Lili Zhao; Subramaniam Pennathur; Rodica Pop-Busui; Izzet Altintas; Jens Tingleff; Marius A Stauning; Ove Andersen; Maria-Evangelia Adami; Nicky Solomonidi; Maria Tsilika; Pinkus Tober-Lau; Eleni Arnaoutoglou; Verena Keitel; Frank Tacke; Athanasios Chalkias; Sven H Loosen; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Jesper Eugen-Olsen; Jochen Reiser; Salim S Hayek
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Prognostic Role of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor at the Emergency Department: A Position Paper by the Hellenic Sepsis Study Group.

Authors:  Dimitrios Velissaris; George Dimopoulos; John Parissis; Zoi Alexiou; Nikolaos Antonakos; Dimitrios Babalis; Styliani Gerakari; Vassileios Kaldis; Pantelis Koutoukas; Malvina Lada; Konstantinos Leventogiannis; Ioannis Pantazopoulos; Antonios Papadopoulos; Eftihia Polyzogopoulou; Charalambos Gogos; Apostolos Armaganidis; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2020-05-12

Review 5.  Fibrinolytic System and Cancer: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Niaz Mahmood; Shafaat A Rabbani
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Inflammation, Hyperglycemia, and Adverse Outcomes in Individuals With Diabetes Mellitus Hospitalized for COVID-19.

Authors:  Alexi Vasbinder; Elizabeth Anderson; Husam Shadid; Hanna Berlin; Michael Pan; Tariq U Azam; Ibrahim Khaleel; Kishan Padalia; Chelsea Meloche; Patrick O'Hayer; Erinleigh Michaud; Tonimarie Catalan; Rafey Feroze; Pennelope Blakely; Christopher Launius; Yiyuan Huang; Lili Zhao; Lynn Ang; Monica Mikhael; Kara Mizokami-Stout; Subramaniam Pennathur; Matthias Kretzler; Sven H Loosen; Athanasios Chalkias; Frank Tacke; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Jochen Reiser; Jesper Eugen-Olsen; Eva L Feldman; Rodica Pop-Busui; Salim S Hayek; Salim S Hayek; Pennelope Blakely; Hanna Berlin; Tariq U Azam; Husam Shadid; Michael Pan; Patrick O'Hayer; Chelsea Meloche; Rafey Feroze; Kishan J Padalia; Elizabeth Anderson; Danny Perry; Abbas Bitar; Rayan Kaakati; Yiyuan Huang; Lili Zhao; Jochen Reiser; Beata Samelko; Alex Hlepas; Priya P Patel; Xuexiang Wang; Jesper Eugen-Olsen; Izzet Altintas; Marius Stauning; Morten Baltzer Houlind; Mette B Lindstrøm; Hejdi Gamst-Jensen; Line Jee Hartmann; Jan O Nehlin; Thomas Kallemose; Imran Parvaiz; Christian Rasmussen; Ove Andersen; Jens Tingleff; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Maria-Evangelia Adami; Nicky Solomonidi; Maria Tsilika; Maria Saridaki; Vasileios Lekakis; Sven H Loosen; Tom Luedde; Verena Keitel; Athanasios Chalkias; Eleni Arnaoutoglou; Ioannis Pantazopoulos; Eleni Laou; Konstantina Kolonia; Anargyros Skoulakis; Frank Tacke; Pinkus Tober-Lau; Raphael Mohr; Florian Kurth; Leif Erik Sander; Christoph Jochum
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Predicting outcomes of COVID-19 from admission biomarkers: a prospective UK cohort study.

Authors:  David T Arnold; Marie Attwood; Shaney Barratt; Anna Morley; Karen T Elvers; Jorgen McKernon; Charmaine Donald; Adrian Oates; Alan Noel; Alasdair MacGowan; Nick A Maskell; Fergus W Hamilton
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Sinus bradycardia is associated with poor outcome in critically ill patients with COVID-19 due to the B.1.1.7 Lineage.

Authors:  Athanasios Chalkias; Ioannis Pantazopoulos; Nikolaos Papagiannakis; Anargyros Skoulakis; Eleni Laou; Konstantina Kolonia; Nicoletta Ntalarizou; Konstantinos Tourlakopoulos; Athanasios Pagonis; Christos Kampolis; Luis García De Guadiana Romualdo; Dimitrios Ragias; Jesper Eugen-Olsen; Konstantinos Gourgoulianis; Eleni Arnaoutoglou
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2021-07-08

9.  RAGE and αVβ3-integrin are essential for suPAR signaling in podocytes.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Stuart E Dryer
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 6.633

10.  Linking stressful life events and chronic inflammation using suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor).

Authors:  Kyle J Bourassa; Line J H Rasmussen; Andrea Danese; Jesper Eugen-Olsen; HonaLee Harrington; Renate Houts; Richie Poulton; Sandhya Ramrakha; Karen Sugden; Ben Williams; Terrie E Moffitt; Avshalom Caspi
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 19.227

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.