Susan C Pitt1, Megan C Saucke1, Benjamin R Roman2, Stewart C Alexander3, Corrine I Voils1,4. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 2. Division of Head and Neck, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 3. Department of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. 4. Research Service, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the role of emotions in treatment decisions for thyroid cancer. We aimed to characterize the emotional content of patient-surgeon communication during decision-making about low-risk thyroid cancer treatment. Methods: We audio-recorded conversations about treatment for clinically low-risk thyroid cancer or biopsy suspicious for thyroid cancer between patients (n = 30) and surgeons (n = 9) in two diverse, academic hospitals in the United States. Inductive and deductive content analyses were used to characterize the emotional content in verbatim transcripts. Results: Patients' expression of emotion focused on primarily on their diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Patients commonly expressed negative emotions like fear and anxiety about "the C-word" and worried about the cancer growing or spreading. In response, most surgeons used education, as opposed to empathy or validation, to reassure patients, often highlighting low probabilities of adverse events. Surgeons emphasized the "slow-growing" nature and excellent prognosis of thyroid cancer compared with other malignancies. When discussing treatment options, surgeons often described alternatives in terms of their emotional outcomes. Some described total thyroidectomy as providing "peace of mind" or a "sense of completeness," warning that cancer or thyroid tissue remaining in the body with active surveillance or lobectomy might "worry" or "bother" patients. Surgeons supported deliberation by reassuring patients that there are "two right answers" and "no rush" to decide. Conclusions: Patients express negative emotions during treatment decision-making. In response, surgeons often miss opportunities to provide empathy in addition to education. Surgeons and patients both acknowledge patient fear and anxiety as a reason to choose thyroidectomy instead of active surveillance. Peace of mind gained by patients and surgeons as a result of thyroidectomy may lead to overtreatment of patients with low-risk thyroid cancer.
Background: Little is known about the role of emotions in treatment decisions for thyroid cancer. We aimed to characterize the emotional content of patient-surgeon communication during decision-making about low-risk thyroid cancer treatment. Methods: We audio-recorded conversations about treatment for clinically low-risk thyroid cancer or biopsy suspicious for thyroid cancer between patients (n = 30) and surgeons (n = 9) in two diverse, academic hospitals in the United States. Inductive and deductive content analyses were used to characterize the emotional content in verbatim transcripts. Results: Patients' expression of emotion focused on primarily on their diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Patients commonly expressed negative emotions like fear and anxiety about "the C-word" and worried about the cancer growing or spreading. In response, most surgeons used education, as opposed to empathy or validation, to reassure patients, often highlighting low probabilities of adverse events. Surgeons emphasized the "slow-growing" nature and excellent prognosis of thyroid cancer compared with other malignancies. When discussing treatment options, surgeons often described alternatives in terms of their emotional outcomes. Some described total thyroidectomy as providing "peace of mind" or a "sense of completeness," warning that cancer or thyroid tissue remaining in the body with active surveillance or lobectomy might "worry" or "bother" patients. Surgeons supported deliberation by reassuring patients that there are "two right answers" and "no rush" to decide. Conclusions: Patients express negative emotions during treatment decision-making. In response, surgeons often miss opportunities to provide empathy in addition to education. Surgeons and patients both acknowledge patient fear and anxiety as a reason to choose thyroidectomy instead of active surveillance. Peace of mind gained by patients and surgeons as a result of thyroidectomy may lead to overtreatment of patients with low-risk thyroid cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
decision; emotion; low-risk; overtreatment; thyroid cancer
Authors: Maria Papaleontiou; David Reyes-Gastelum; Brittany L Gay; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Sarah T Hawley; Megan R Haymart Journal: Thyroid Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Yong Gyu Hyun; Ahmad Alhashemi; Rouhi Fazelzad; Alyse S Goldberg; David P Goldstein; Anna M Sawka Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; John Pura; Paolo Goffredo; Michaela A Dinan; Terry Hyslop; Shelby D Reed; Randall P Scheri; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Robert J Volk; Stephanie L McFall; Scott B Cantor; Theresa L Byrd; Yen-Chi L Le; Deborah A Kuban; Patricia Dolan Mullen Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Pim J Bongers; Caylee A Greenberg; Ralph Hsiao; Marloes Vermeer; Menno R Vriens; Martijn F Lutke Holzik; David P Goldstein; Karen Devon; Lorne E Rotstein; Anna M Sawka; Jesse D Pasternak Journal: Surgery Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Ton Wang; Nicole Mott; Jacquelyn Miller; Nicholas L Berlin; Sarah Hawley; Reshma Jagsi; Lesly A Dossett Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-09-01
Authors: Elisa Pasqual; Julie Ann Sosa; Yingxi Chen; Sara J Schonfeld; Amy Berrington de González; Cari M Kitahara Journal: Thyroid Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 6.506