| Literature DB >> 34637400 |
Binita Chakraborty1, Jovita Byemerwa1, Jonathan Shepherd2, Corinne N Haines1, Robert Baldi1, Weida Gong2, Wen Liu1, Debarati Mukherjee1, Sandeep Artham1, Felicia Lim1, Yeeun Bae1, Olivia Brueckner1, Kendall Tavares1, Suzanne E Wardell1, Brent A Hanks3, Charles M Perou2, Ching-Yi Chang1, Donald P McDonnell1.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies have significantly prolonged patient survival across multiple tumor types, particularly in melanoma. Interestingly, sex-specific differences in response to ICB have been observed, with males receiving a greater benefit from ICB than females, although the mechanism or mechanisms underlying this difference are unknown. Mining published transcriptomic data sets, we determined that the response to ICBs is influenced by the functionality of intratumoral macrophages. This puts into context our observation that estrogens (E2) working through the estrogen receptor α (ERα) stimulated melanoma growth in murine models by skewing macrophage polarization toward an immune-suppressive state that promoted CD8+ T cell dysfunction and exhaustion and ICB resistance. This activity was not evident in mice harboring macrophage-specific depletion of ERα, confirming a direct role for estrogen signaling within myeloid cells in establishing an immunosuppressed state. Inhibition of ERα using fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor downregulator (SERD), decreased tumor growth, stimulated adaptive immunity, and increased the antitumor efficacy of ICBs. Further, a gene signature that determines ER activity in macrophages predicted survival in patients with melanoma treated with ICB. These results highlight the importance of E2/ER signaling as a regulator of intratumoral macrophage polarization, an activity that can be therapeutically targeted to reverse immune suppression and increase ICB efficacy.Entities:
Keywords: Macrophages; Oncology; Skin cancer; T cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34637400 PMCID: PMC8631601 DOI: 10.1172/JCI151347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Invest ISSN: 0021-9738 Impact factor: 14.808