Literature DB >> 34636069

Associations between inflammasome-related gene NLRP3 Polymorphisms (rs10754558 and rs35829419) and risk of bladder cancer in a Chinese population.

Gang Xu1, Ruohui Huang1, Wei Xia1, Bo Jiang1, Guancheng Xiao1, Yanmin Li1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: NLRP3 inflammasome as a component of immune system has been found related to several cancers, but no study has assessed NLRP3 polymorphisms on risk of bladder cancer (BC). We aim to investigate whether NLRP3 polymorphisms are associated with the risk and clinical features of bladder cancer (BC) in a Chinese population.
METHODS: Genotype frequency of two commonly studied NLRP3 SNPs (rs10754558 and rs35829419) was examined in 154 patients with BC and the 308 healthy controls. NLRP3 gene polymorphisms were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method.
RESULTS: The distribution frequencies of GG, AG+GG, GG, and G allele in NLRP3 (rs10754558) genotypes were significantly different between case and control group (OR = 2.296, P = .022; OR = 1.598, P = .020; OR = 1.998, P = .049; OR = 1.557, P = .006), but no statistical difference existed for rs35829419. Among smokers and alcohol drinkers, for rs10754558, individuals with AG, GG, and GG+AG genotypes had a higher BC risk compared with individuals with AA; for rs35829419, individuals with variant genotypes (AG and GG+AG) had a stronger risk of developing BC compared with individuals with AA (all P < .05). In stratified analyses of tumor size and tumor node metastasis, AG or GG genotypes of rs10754558 and rs35829419 SNPs were associated with BC risk (both P < .05).
CONCLUSION: NLRP3 polymorphisms (rs10754558 and rs35829419) were related to BC risk and tumor size and lymph node metastasis, especially among smokers and alcohol drinkers.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chinese population; NLRP3; bladder cancer; polymorphism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34636069      PMCID: PMC8605168          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


INTRODUCTION

Bladder cancer (BC) is the second most frequent diagnosed urinary cancer, ranked ninth among all cancers by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2012. Morbidity and mortality rates in developing regions are up to three times higher than in developed countries, and men are four times more likely to develop bladder cancer than women. In 2012, a total of 165,000 deaths and 429,000 new cases were recorded globally, of which 26,820 deaths and 55,486 new cases were recorded in China, with an incidence rate of 3/100,000, and East Asia (37,491 deaths and 85,451 new cases) accounted for a large proportion. Emerging evidence suggests that bladder cancer is a complex, multi‐step, and multifactorial disease due to the interaction of lifestyle, environmental, and genetic factors. GWAS studies have identified gene variants that contribute to bladder cancer risk, and many gene variants have been demonstrated to be correlated with risk. , , It has been reported that inflammation plays a critical role in carcinogenesis and tumorigenesis, such as the initiation and promotion of cancer cells, , as well as tumor progression, angiogenesis, and invasion. Inflammasome is a complex of proteins in cells that can be formed in response to various stimuli. However, the exact role of inflammasome in heterogeneous tumorigenesis remains unclear. The Nod‐like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) is one of the most typical inflammasome components, such as pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and/or damage‐associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Studies have shown that the dysfunction of NLRP3 inflammasome pathway is related to various inflammation‐induced diseases, and the genetic variation of NLRP3 inflammasome pathway gene is associated with the development of malignant tumors, such as chronic myeloid leukemia and melanoma. AIM2‐like receptors (ALRs), leucine‐rich repeat sequences containing receptors (NLR), or nucleotide‐binding domains do not have inflammasome complexes. NLRP3 inflammasomes consist of NLRP3, the connector apoptosis‐related speckle‐like protein (ASC), and caspase‐1, which are activated by intracellular process or by foreign pathogens in vivo. The NLRP3 gene is located at 1q44, with a length of ~30 kbp, including 9 exons and 8 introns). NLRP3 is a member of NLR family and participates in increasing inflammatory cytokine production. Genetic alterations in NLRP3 gene could alter its activity. About 60 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been reported within the NLRP3 gene. Two NLRP3 polymorphisms have been extensively studied: rs10754558 and rs35829419, which are located in the 3'‐UTR of the NLRP3 gene and may affect the stability and expression of NLRP3 mRNA. These two SNPs have been demonstrated that could be related to different multifactorial diseases such as coronary artery disease, as well as cancers such as Philadelphia chromosome‐negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and lung cancer, , but the role of these genetic variants in the development of BC remains unclear. In this study, NLRP3 SNPs rs10754558 and rs35829419 were detected and analyzed in Chinese population, aiming to explore its influence on the development and progression of BC, which may provide new insights for the prevention strategies and therapeutic target for bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Recruitment of patients

The study was a case‐control study conducted from March 23, 2016 to February 1, 2020. 154 patients with histologically diagnosed bladder cancer were recruited from Department of Urological Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China. Patients with other malignancies, chronic diseases, and prior radiation or chemotherapy were excluded from the study. All BC cases were staged according to the 2002 International Union Against Cancer TNM Staging System and graded using the World Health Organization classification: highly differentiated or poorly differentiated. A total of 308 healthy controls with no history of cancer, who received regular health checks from the same hospital, were not genetically related individuals and were matched for sex and age (±3 years). All individuals were surveyed using a structured questionnaire, including gender, age, smoking, drinking status, and other exposure history, with the informed consent of each participant. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University and was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964.

Genotyping

Approximately 2.0 ml of venous blood was extracted from each person and stored at −80℃. Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples using the QIAAMP DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), as recommended by the manufacturer's protocol. The A/G polymorphism of NLRP3 gene was genotyped by using the polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR‐RFLP). The sequences of primers have been reported previously : (1) rs10754558: 5′‐ GACAATGACAGCATCGGGTGTTGTT‐3′ (forward) and 5′‐ TCATCACAGCGCCTCAGTTAGAGGA −3′ (reverse); (2) rs35829419: 5′‐ GGAAGGCCGACACCTTGATATGGTG −3′ (forward) and 5′‐ AGTGTGTCCTCCCAAGCTCCTCTCA −3′ (reverse). The specific primers were designed manually and synthesized by GeneScript Biotechnology (Nanjing, China). PCR conditions were as follows: Initial denaturation was carried out at 95℃ for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 95℃ for 30 s, 35 cycles at 0℃ for 30 s, and 72℃ for 30 s and finished with a final extension cycle at 72℃ for 10 min. The PCR products were digested with EcoRI and separated in a 3% agarose gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. The sizes of the different genotypes were 261 bp for AA, 261 bp, 236 bp, and 25 bp for AG, and 236 bp, and 25 bp for GG of rs10754558; 429 bp for AA, 429 bp, 258 bp, and 171 bp for AG, and 258 bp, and 171 for GG of rs35829419, respectively.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 20.0 software was used to analyze the data. Clinical features were tested using chi‐square tests and t tests depending on variables types. SNPStats online analysis software provides genotype associations, including dominant, dominant, recessive, and dominant inheritance models, to calculate allele frequencies of NLRP3 (rs10754558, rs35829419) in case‐control studies. SNPs in both bladder cancer cases and healthy controls were tested for Hardy‐Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). The odds ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated by unconditional logistic regression to assess the role of different genotypes and alleles. A P value <.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

The baseline characteristics of the study population have been shown in Table 1. No remarkable differences were found between the two groups in age (P = .818) and gender (P = .677). However, statistical differences were found in the distribution of smoking or alcohol consumption between the two groups (P < .001). As for the grade of bladder cancer, 97 cases (62.99%) were highly differentiated and 227 cases (37.01%) were poorly differentiated. In terms of tumor size, 113 cases (73.38%) with a size of <3 cm; 41 cases (26.62%) were >3 cm in size. TNM stages I, II, III, and IV were 34 (22.08%), 43 (27.92%), 46 (29.87%), and 31 (20.13%), respectively. There were 142 patients (92.86%) with lymph node metastasis, and 11 patients (7.14%) without lymph node metastasis. HWE test showed that genotypes frequencies of both the polymorphisms both in cases and healthy controls were according with HWE (all P > .05).
TABLE 1

Clinical characteristics of bladder cancer cases and controls included in the data analysis

VariablesCase (n = 154)Control (n = 308) t /Χ2 P
Age, years63.87 ± 11.2464.12 ± 10.870.230.818
Sex, n (%)
Male126 (81.82)247 (80.19)0.174.677
Female28 (18.18)61 (19.81)
Smokers, n (%)
Yes108 (70.13)121 (39.29)39.072<.001
No46 (29.87)187 (60.71)
Alcohol drinkers, n (%)
Yes101 (65.58)110 (35.71)36.917<.001
No53 (34.42)198 (64.29)
Tumor grade, n (%) a
High97 (62.99)
Low57 (37.01)
Tumor Size (cm), n (%)
<3113 (73.38)
≥341 (26.62)
TNM Stage, n (%)
34 (22.08)
43 (27.92)
46 (29.87)
31 (20.13)
Lymph node metastasis, n (%)
Yes143 (92.86)
No11 (7.14)

Classified by WHO classification: Highly differentiated tumors are defined as showing only mild degrees of cytological atypia and infrequent mitotic figures; poorly differentiated tumors are defined as showing marked nuclear pleomorphism, loss of maturation from the base to the surface, and mitotic activity.

Clinical characteristics of bladder cancer cases and controls included in the data analysis Classified by WHO classification: Highly differentiated tumors are defined as showing only mild degrees of cytological atypia and infrequent mitotic figures; poorly differentiated tumors are defined as showing marked nuclear pleomorphism, loss of maturation from the base to the surface, and mitotic activity.

Association of NLRP3 gene A/G polymorphism with the risk of bladder cancer

First, we examined the distribution of single nucleotide polymorphisms in NLRP3 in the case group and the control group (Table 2). For rs10754558, the distribution frequencies of GG, AG + GG, GG, and G allele were statistically different between the case and control groups, and their ORs and 95% CIs were 2.296 (1.125–4.685, P = .022), 1.598 (1.076–2.375, P = .020), 1.998 (1.004–3.975, P = .049), and 1.557 (1.138–2.131, P = .006), respectively. But A allele showed no statistically significant differences in distribution between the case and the control group (P > .05). For rs35829419, no statistical differences were found in the distribution of various genotypes between the case and the control group (all P > .05).
TABLE 2

Distribution of the NLRP3 polymorphisms and association analysis in patients with bladder cancer and healthy controls

SNPGenotypeCase (n = 154)Control (n = 308)OR (95%CI)P
rs10754558AA81 (52.60)197 (63.96)1.000
AG56 (36.36)93 (30.19)1.464 (0.960, 2.231).076
GG17 (11.04)18 (5.84)2.296 (1.125, 4.685).022
AG+GG73 (47.40)111 (29.21)1.598 (1.076, 2.375).020
AA+AG137 (88.96)290 (94.15)1.000
GG17 (11.04)18 (5.84)1.998 (1.004, 3.975).049
A allele218 (70.78)487 (79.06)1.000
G allele90 (29.22)129 (20.94)1.557 (1.138, 2.131).006
rs35829419AA88 (57.14)197 (63.96)1.000
AG51 (33.12)90 (29.22)1.254 (0.819, 1.918).298
GG15 (9.74)21 (6.82)1.679 (0.821, 3.433).156
AG+GG66 (42.86)111 (36.04)1.328 (0.887, 1.989).168
AA+AG139 (90.26)287 (93.18)1.000
GG15 (9.74)21 (6.82)1.553 (0.771, 3.126).218
A allele227 (73.70)484 (78.57)1.000
G allele81 (26.30)132 (21.43)1.320 (0.959, 1.818).088
Distribution of the NLRP3 polymorphisms and association analysis in patients with bladder cancer and healthy controls Stratified analysis was conducted by smoking and drinking status (Table 3). When stratified by smoking and alcohol consumption, the risk of BC was significantly increased for rs10754558: smoker AG or/and GG genotypes (AG vs. AA, OR = 1.829, 95%CI 1.042–3.211, P = .035; GG vs. AA, OR = 11.82, 95%CI 1.424–98.180, P = .022; GG+AG vs. AA, OR = 2.115, 95%CI 1.224–3.654, P = .007) and alcohol drinkers (AG vs. AA, OR = 2.724, 95%CI 1.426–5.201, P = .002; GG vs. AA, OR = 4.284, 95%CI 1.314–13.970, P = .016; GG+AG vs. AA, OR = 3.019, 95%CI 1.657–5.500, P < .001). For rs35829419, smokers with AG or/and GG genotypes had a significantly increased risk of BC (AG vs. AA, OR = 1.784, 95%CI 1.031– 3.089, P = .039; GG+AG vs. AA, OR = 1.815, 95%CI 1.055–3.123, P = .031) and non‐alcohol drinkers (GG vs. AA, OR = 10.278, 95%CI 4.035–26.178, P < .01; GG+AG vs. AA, OR = 2.570, 95%CI 1.381–4.784, P = .003).
TABLE 3

Subgroup analysis of distribution of the NLRP3 polymorphisms and association analysis in patients with bladder cancer and healthy controls by smoking and alcohol drinking status

SNPFactorsCase/ControlAG vs. AAGG vs. AAGG vs. AA+AGGG+AG vs. AA
AAAGGGOR (95%CI)POR (95%CI)POR (95%CI)POR (95%CI)P
rs10754558Smokers a Yes58/8642/348/11.829 (1.042, 3.211).03511.82 (1.424, 98.18).0220.103 (0.013, 0.837).0332.115 (1.224, 3.654).007
No30/1119/567/200.595 (0.264, 1.341).2101.292 (0.497, 3.355).5991.496 (0.590, 3.796).3960.776 (0.394, 1.528).463
Alcohol drinkers b Yes60/8736/1912/42.724 (1.426, 5.201).0024.284 (1.314, 13.97).0163.304 (1.019, 10.71).0463.019 (1.657, 5.500)<.001
No28/11015/713/170.810 (0.403, 1.627).5530.664 (0.181, 2.429).5362.638 (1.114, 6.249).0271.632 (0.884, 3.015).117
rs35829419Smokers a Yes60/8446/362/11.784 (1.031, 3.089).0392.795 (0.247, 31.58).4062.259 (0.202, 25.27).5081.815 (1.055, 3.123).031
No21/11310/5715/170.990 (0.483, 2.029).9780.326 (0.108, 0.982).0460.325 (0.110, 0.964).0430.980 (0.504, 1.950).953
Alcohol drinkers b Yes62/5038/338/121.207 (0.673, 2.164).5280.698 (0.267, 1.825).4640.651 (0.254, 1.667).3701.001 (0.580, 1.726).997
No19/14718/609/61.429 (0.692, 2.951).33510.28 (4.035, 26.178)<.0019.070 (3.725, 22.08)<.0012.570 (1.381, 4.784).003

Smokers refer to daily smokers or smoking at least 1 time per day for at least 6 months.

Alcohol drinkers refer to those reporting ≥1, standard drink per week over the past 30 days.

Subgroup analysis of distribution of the NLRP3 polymorphisms and association analysis in patients with bladder cancer and healthy controls by smoking and alcohol drinking status Smokers refer to daily smokers or smoking at least 1 time per day for at least 6 months. Alcohol drinkers refer to those reporting ≥1, standard drink per week over the past 30 days.

Association of NLRP3 gene A/G polymorphism with the characteristics of bladder cancer

We also investigated whether NLRP3 A/G polymorphisms influence the clinical characteristics of patients with bladder cancer (Table 4). The results showed that for rs10754558, GG or AG + GG genotype polymorphisms were related to BC risk in groups with tumor size ≥3 cm (GG vs. AA, 0.236, 95%CI 0.079–0.704, P = .010; AG + GG vs. AA, OR = 0.480, 95%CI 0.234–0.985, P = .046), with null association observed for AG (P > .05). This association was also shown in analysis of tumor node metastasis (GG vs. AA, OR = 4.284, 95%CI 1.455–12.616, P = .008), with null interaction observed for tumor grade and TNM Stage (P > .05). For rs35829419, GG or AG + GG genotype polymorphism was associated with bladder cancer risk (GG vs. AA, 0.225, 95%CI 0.072–0.704, P = .010; AG + GG vs. AA, OR = 0.439, 95%CI 0.213–0.905, P = .026). This association was also shown in analysis of tumor node metastasis (GG vs. AA, OR = 3.999, 95%CI 1.286–12.439, P = .017), with null interaction found for tumor grade and TNM Stage (P > .05). This result suggests that NLRP3 A/G polymorphism is related to tumor size and tumor node metastasis in patients with bladder cancer. No statistical association was found when stratified by tumor histology and TNM stage (both P > .05).
TABLE 4

Subgroup analysis of distribution of the NLRP3 polymorphisms and association analysis in patients with bladder cancer and healthy controls by tumor clinical characteristics

CharacteristicsAAAGGGAG+GG
rs10754558Tumor Grade (high/low)55/2634/228/942/31
OR (95%CI) P1.0000.731 (0.359, 1.488) 0.3870.420 (0.145, 1.214) 0.1090.640 (0.331, 1.237) 0.184
Tumor Size (cm) (<3/≥3)64/1739/178/947/26
OR (95%CI) P1.0000.609 (0.279, 1.331) 0.2140.236 (0.079, 0.704) 0.0100.480 (0.234, 0.985) 0.046
TNM Stage (Ⅰ+Ⅱ/Ⅲ+Ⅳ)46/4222/347/1029/44
OR (95%CI) P1.0000.590 (0.298, 1.168) 0.1300.639 (0.222, 1.838) 0.4060.602 (0.321, 1.129) 0.114
Lymph node metastasis (Y/N)22/6618/3810/728/45
OR (95%CI) P1.0001.420 (0.677, 2.980) 0.3534.284 (1.455, 12.616) 0.0081.866 (0.949, 3.670) 0.070
rs35829419Tumor Grade (high/low)59/2931/208/739/27
OR (95%CI) P1.0000.762 (0.372, 1.561) 0.4570.562 (0.185, 1.703) 0.3080.710 (0.365, 1.370) 0.312
Tumor Size (cm) (<3/≥3)70/1835/167/841/24
OR (95%CI) P1.0000.563 (0.256, 1.237) 0.5630.225 (0.072, 0.704) 0.0100.439 (0.213, 0.905) 0.026
TNM Stage (Ⅰ+Ⅱ/Ⅲ+Ⅳ)47/4122/297/829/37
OR (95%CI) P1.0000.662 (0.330, 1.327) 0.2450.763 (0.254, 2.286) 0.6280.683 (0.358, 1.302) 0.247
Lymph node metastasis (Y/N)24/6417/349/626/40
OR (95%CI) P1.0001.332 (0.630, 2.817) 0.4523.999 (1.286, 12.439) 0.0171.733 (0.876, 3.428) 0.114
Subgroup analysis of distribution of the NLRP3 polymorphisms and association analysis in patients with bladder cancer and healthy controls by tumor clinical characteristics

DISCUSSION

In this study, we found that NLRP3 (rs10754558 and rs35829419) A/G polymorphisms were related to a higher risk of BC. In subgroup analysis, these associations were only significant among smokers and drinkers. In addition, both of these two SNPs were related to tumor size and lymph node metastasis in patients with bladder cancer. Bladder cancer is a complex disease and genetic factor involving interactions between various environments. Studies have suggested that immune cells play a critical role in bladder cancer development. NLRP3 inflammasome works in innate immune response and affects many diseases, involving metabolic, cardiovascular, renal, and neurodegenerative diseases. NLR can be activated by cellular stress and tissue injury. NLRP3 inflammasome can be activated by ROS, when thioredoxin‐interacting protein (TXNIP) dissociates from thioredoxin and binds to NLRP3. Lack of TXNIP weakens NLRP3 inflammasome activation and subsequent IL‐1β secretion, which could be correlated to the development of diabetes. However, the association between NLRP3 and bladder cancer requires further study. NLRP3 inflammasomes play a role in the immune response, but also in susceptibility to inflammation‐induced abnormalities. NLRP3 gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 1q44 and contains 9 exons in its 32.9 KB sequence. Studies have shown the relationship between NLRP3 SNP and susceptibility to inflammation‐induced abnormalities. About 60 SNPs of NLRP3 gene have been reported, but few have tested the relationship between NLRP3 genotype and cancer. NLRP3 (rs35829419) genotype is correlated to poorer outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, this genotype is neither related to myeloid leukemia 14 nor pancreatic cancer. In this study, rs10754558 G and rs35829419 G NLRP3 alleles tended to be related to the risk of BC. Inflammation works in the occurrence and development of cancer. Over‐activation of Nuclear factor‐kappa B and STAT signaling, these inflammatory pathways, leading to abnormal increase of inflammatory cytokines and over‐response of immune cells, thereby promoting the progression of cancer. Accumulated evidence indicates that NLRP3 is closely associated with susceptibility, development, and outcome of cancer. NLRP3 derived from cancer‐associated fibroblasts accelerates the progression of breast carcinoma. NLRP3 complex activation results in the production of IL‐1β and IL‐18, and the generation of pyrolytic cell death. Inhibition of NLRP3 by inhibiting S100A9 or inhibitors of NLRP3 can effectively attenuate the development of cancer. In addition, NLRP3 is indispensable for adaptive immunity to tumors. Deficiency of functional NLRP3 leads to failure of CD8+T cell initiation, thereby inhibiting the antitumor effect of chemotherapy in the mouse model. Although the effect of inflammasomes on the progression of BC is unclear, the effect of inflammasomes in the development of cancer has been investigated in a series of other cancer studies using colitis‐induced colon cancer as an animal model. One study found that inflammasome components prevented colitis‐associated colon cancer. Other studies have suggested that inflammation associated with cancer may promote tumor growth and metastasis. For example, one study reported that NLRP3 promotes inflammation to induce skin cancer and is essential for asbestos‐induced mesothelioma. Other studies have shown that the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome promotes the metastasis of breast cancer to liver and lung tissue, and NLRP3 inflammasome can activate the secretion of IL‐18 and IL‐1β in lung adenocarcinoma A549 cell line, and IL‐18 and IL‐1β are the main components of the inflammatory response. These studies suggest that NLRP3 inflammasomes are involved in carcinogenesis in various organs. On one hand, smoking is a significant risk factor for BC. In 11 case‐control analyses, men's risk of BC increased with the consumptions of cigarette. A linear increased risk of up to 15–20 cigarettes per day was reported. After treatment was discontinued, the risk of bladder cancer dropped sharply by about 30 percent after 1 to 4 years. But even after 25 years, operating rooms still have not reached the number of nonsmokers. These results were next validated in a meta‐analysis involving 43 comprehensive studies. Subsequent to adjusting for age and sex, the risk for all smokers was significantly increased compared with nonsmokers, which revealed a confirmed association of consumption and exposure package year. On the other hand, until now, the relationship between BC and alcohol has been ambiguous. Early studies were unable to establish a relation between BC risk and alcohol consumption. This is in contrast to a recent study that suggested that high alcohol consumption, especially the frequent consumption of high‐strength liquor, could cause BC. The average OR of male drinkers was 2.1 and that of female drinkers was 3.4. These results suggest that regular alcohol consumption is independently correlated with an increased risk of BC. In the contrast, other studies have shown that alcohol consumption is related to a relatively lower BC risk. , Systematic meta‐analyses of 30 epidemiological trials were unable to establish an association between alcohol consumption and bladder cancer. In the subgroup analysis, we observed important findings in the population of smokers and drinkers, suggesting that exposure to smoking and alcohol may be more likely to develop bladder cancer. In addition, as previously reported, NLRP3 was associated with the tumor metastasis. , We also found that the A/G polymorphism of NLRP3 gene (rs10754558, rs35829419) is associated with tumor size and tumor node metastasis in patients with BC, suggesting that the SNP may interact with tumor size and tumor node metastasis. NLRP3 may be associated with tumor size, invasion, lymph node metastasis, and TNM staging by activating the epithelial‐mesenchymal transition process through inflammation response. We should acknowledge the potential limitations of this study. First, selection bias cannot be addressed in such case‐control studies. Second, only two loci in NLRP3 gene were explored, and other genetic variations should be further studied. Third, the potential mechanism of A/G polymorphism in NLRP3 gene (rs10754558, rs35829419) and increased risk of BC should also be investigated. Fourth, further cross‐analysis is needed to verify the combined impact of environmental and genetic factors on bladder cancer susceptibility. In conclusion, our study firstly indicated that NLRP3 (rs10754558 and rs35829419) A/G polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of BC in the Chinese population in this study. Larger studies with larger sample sizes from other ethnic groups are needed to confirm these findings.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that no conflicts of interests exist.
  51 in total

1.  NLRP3 is expressed in human dental pulp cells and tissues.

Authors:  Zhi Song; Zhengmei Lin; Feng He; Lan Jiang; Wei Qin; Yaguang Tian; Runfu Wang; Shuheng Huang
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  Association of nod-like receptor protein-3 single nucleotide gene polymorphisms and expression with the susceptibility to relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Danyal Imani; Amirreza Azimi; Zahra Salehi; Nima Rezaei; Rahimeh Emamnejad; Maryam Sadr; Maryam Izad
Journal:  Int J Immunogenet       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 1.466

3.  The genetic polymorphism and expression profiles of NLRP3 inflammasome in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Amin Zhang; Jie Yu; Shuxin Yan; Xia Zhao; Chen Chen; Ying Zhou; Xueyun Zhao; Mingqiang Hua; Ruiqing Wang; Chen Zhang; Chaoqin Zhong; Na He; Chunyan Ji; Daoxin Ma
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.850

4.  NLRP3 promotes inflammation-induced skin cancer but is dispensable for asbestos-induced mesothelioma.

Authors:  Melvyn T Chow; Jürg Tschopp; Andreas Möller; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 5.126

5.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Use of a novel genetic mouse model to investigate the role of folate in colitis-associated colon cancer.

Authors:  Robert S Chapkin; Barton A Kamen; Evelyn S Callaway; Laurie A Davidson; Nysia I George; Naisyin Wang; Joanne R Lupton; Richard H Finnell
Journal:  J Nutr Biochem       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 7.  The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics.

Authors:  Karen V Swanson; Meng Deng; Jenny P-Y Ting
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 8.  Advances in bladder cancer biology and therapy.

Authors:  Linda Tran; Jin-Fen Xiao; Neeraj Agarwal; Jason E Duex; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 69.800

9.  Associations between inflammasome-related gene NLRP3 Polymorphisms (rs10754558 and rs35829419) and risk of bladder cancer in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Ruohui Huang; Wei Xia; Bo Jiang; Guancheng Xiao; Yanmin Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 10.  Urinary bladder cancer susceptibility markers. What do we know about functional mechanisms?

Authors:  Aleksandra M Dudek; Anne J Grotenhuis; Sita H Vermeulen; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Gerald W Verhaegh
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  1 in total

1.  Associations between inflammasome-related gene NLRP3 Polymorphisms (rs10754558 and rs35829419) and risk of bladder cancer in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Ruohui Huang; Wei Xia; Bo Jiang; Guancheng Xiao; Yanmin Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.