| Literature DB >> 34635603 |
Marco Gelpi1, Flora Mikaeloff2, Andreas D Knudsen1, Rui Benfeitas3, Shuba Krishnan2, Sara Svenssson Akusjärvi2, Julie Høgh1, Daniel D Murray4, Henrik Ullum5, Ujjwal Neogi2,6, Susanne D Nielsen1.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a significant factor for cardiometabolic comorbidities in people living with HIV (PLWH) and a barrier to healthy aging. The long-term consequences of HIV-infection and combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in metabolic reprogramming are unknown. In this study, we investigated metabolic alterations in well-treated PLWH with MetS to identify potential mechanisms behind the MetS phenotype using advanced statistical and machine learning algorithms. We included 200 PLWH from the Copenhagen Comorbidity in HIV-infection (COCOMO) study. PLWH were grouped into PLWH with MetS (n = 100) defined according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) consensus worldwide definition of the MetS or without MetS (n = 100). The untargeted plasma metabolomics was performed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (UHPLC/MS/MS) and immune-phenotyping of Glut1 (glucose transporter), xCT (glutamate/cysteine transporter) and MCT1 (pyruvate/lactate transporter) by flow cytometry. We applied several conventional approaches, machine learning algorithms, and linear classification models to identify the biologically relevant metabolites associated with MetS in PLWH. Of the 877 identified biochemicals, 9% (76/877) differed significantly between PLWH with and without MetS (false discovery rate < 0.05). The majority belonged to amino acid metabolism (43%). A consensus identification by combining supervised and unsupervised methods indicated 11 biomarkers of MetS phenotype in PLWH. A weighted co-expression network identified seven communities of positively intercorrelated metabolites. A single community contained six of the potential biomarkers mainly related to glutamate metabolism. Transporter expression identified altered xCT and MCT in both lymphocytic and monocytic cells. Combining metabolomics and immune-phenotyping indicated altered glutamate metabolism associated with MetS in PLWH, which has clinical significance.Entities:
Keywords: HIV-infection; antiretroviral therapy; immune-phenotyping; metabolic syndrome; metabolomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34635603 PMCID: PMC8544298 DOI: 10.18632/aging.203622
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Clinical and demographic characteristics.
|
|
|
| |
|
| 100 | 100 | |
|
| 52 (48–61) | 52 (47–62) | 0.805* |
| 90 (90) | 90 (90) | 1** | |
| Homosexual/bisexual | 73 (73) | 71 (71) | 0.745** |
| Blood transfusion | 1 (1) | 0 | |
| PWID | 0 | 1 (1) | |
| Heterosexual | 20 (20) | 23 (23) | |
| Other/unknown | 4 (4) | 5 (5) | |
| 200 (82–340) | 280 (168–354) | 0.182* | |
| 691 (538–865) | 700 (547–892) | 0.865* | |
| 830 (620–1215) | 755 (580–970) | 0.152* | |
| 94 (94) | 98 (98) | 0.127** | |
| 13.4 (7) | 12.7 (6·1) | 0.455* | |
| 53 (53) | 38 (38.0) | 0.039** | |
| 17.2 (9.5) | 16 (8.1) | 0.329*** | |
| 100 (100) | 100 (100) | 1** | |
| 26 (3) | 23 (4) | <0.001*** | |
| 0.9 (0.8–1.1) | 1.3 (1.1–1.6) | <0.001* | |
| 2.7 (2.1–3.7) | 1.3 (1.1–1.7) | <0.001* | |
| 102.0 (95.0–105.2) | 89.5 (85.0–97.0) | <0.001* | |
| 138.5 (131.0–145.2) | 124.5 (117.8–142.0) | <0.001* | |
| 86.0 (79.0–91.2) | 79.0 (73.0–85.2) | <0.001* |
*Mann-Whitney U test, **Chi-square test, ***T-test. Abbreviations: PLWH: people living with HIV; MetS: metabolic syndrome; PWID: people who inject drugs; IQR: interquartile range; BMI: body mass index; Tgl: triglycerides; BP: blood pressure; cART: combination antiretroviral therapy; sd: Standard deviations.
Figure 1Differing metabolites and pathways found between PLWH and PLWH with MetS. (A) Doughnut charts of metabolite proportions for each super pathway for all detected metabolites (left) and metabolites with differential abundance between PLWH and PLWH with MetS (LIMMA, FDR < 0.1, n = 69). (B) Metabolites contribution to the flow of top 13 pathways represented as Sankey Plot. (C) Cytoscape network of top 13 pathways and associated enriched metabolites.
Figure 2Biomarkers ( (A) Bubble plot representing Random forest variable importance based on mean decrease accuracy (a measure of the model’s performance without each metabolite). Values are scaled by the standard error of the measure. Metabolites represented at the top of the figure are the most important for prediction. (B) Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of random forest classifier. (C) Venn diagram summarizing biomarkers identified by Mann-Whitney U test, LIMMA, Random Forest (RF), and PLS-DA. (D) UMAP visualization of the 11 biomarkers. Controls (green) and PLWH (yellow) are segregating from PLWH with MetS (red). (E) Heatmap showing log2 intensities of the 11 biomarkers in HC, PLWH without MetS and PLWH with MetS.
Figure 3Central carbon metabolism with higher efflux of key metabolites. (A) Heatmap showing the level of metabolites of glutamate metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis/pyruvate metabolism, and TCA cycle. The statistically significant differentially abundant metabolites are marked with single asterisk at the level of p < 0.001 and FDR < 0.1 and double asterisk p < 0.001 and FDR < 0.05 using LIMMA. Single asterisks indicate statistically significant differences p < 0.001 and FDR < 0.1 and double asterisk p < 0.001 and FDR < 0.05. (B) Gating strategy for Glut1, MCT-1, and xCT in T cells (CD4 and CD8) and monocytes (CM, IM, and NCM). (C) Bubble plot of Glut1, MCT-1, and xCT in subpopulations. Size of the bubble represents proportion of positive cells (%). Color of the bubbles represent MFI. (D) Contour plots showing sample with median percentage of cells for each population. (E) MFI for MCT-1 and xCT in lymphocytes (CD4 and CD8) and monocytes (CM, IM, and NCM). (F) Co-relation analysis between the transporter expression and the differentially altered metabolites between PLWH with MetS and without MetS as shown in Figure 3A. Asterisk indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 4The metabolome-wide weighted co-expression network. A weighted metabolite co-expression network was generated (positive Spearman rank correlations, FDR < 0·05). Significant metabolites based on LIMMA have represented opaques and non-significant transparent. Biomarkers found in the first community are represented (bottom-left).