Xiaoshuang Zhang1,2, Tong Lei1,2, Peng Chen3, Lei Wang1, Jian Wang1, Donghui Wang1,2, Wenhuan Guo1,2, Yabin Zhou1,2, Quanhai Li4,5, Hongwu Du1,2. 1. Daxing Research Institute, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China. 2. School of Chemistry and Biological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China. 3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Basic Research on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China. 4. Cell Therapy Laboratory, the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. 5. Department of Immunology, Basic Medical College, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Abstract
Stem cells in different types may interact with each other to maintain homeostasis or growth and the interactions are complicated and extensive. There is increasing evidence that mesenchymal-epithelial interactions in early morphogenesis stages of both tooth and hair follicles show many similarities. In order to explore whether stem cells from one tissue could interact with cells from another tissue, a series of experiments were carried out. Here we successfully extracted and identified stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) of 8-12 years old kids, and then found that SHED could promote hair regeneration in a mouse model. In vitro, SHED shortened the hair regeneration cycle and promoted the proliferation and aggregation of dermal cells. In vivo, when SHED and skin cells of C57 mice were subcutaneously co-transplanted to nude mice, more hair was formed than skin cells without SHED. To further explore the molecular mechanism, epidermal and dermal cells were freshly extracted and co-cultured with SHED. Then several signaling molecules in hair follicle regeneration were detected and we found that the expression of Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) and Glioma-associated oncogene 1 (Gli1) was up-regulated. It seems that SHED may boost the prosperity of hairs by increase Shh/Gli1 pathway, which brings new perspectives in tissue engineering and damaged tissue repairing.
Stem cells in different types may interact with each other to maintain homeostasis or growth and the interactions are complicated and extensive. There is increasing evidence that mesenchymal-epithelial interactions in early morphogenesis stages of both tooth and hair follicles show many similarities. In order to explore whether stem cells from one tissue could interact with cells from another tissue, a series of experiments were carried out. Here we successfully extracted and identified stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) of 8-12 years old kids, and then found that SHED could promote hair regeneration in a mouse model. In vitro, SHED shortened the hair regeneration cycle and promoted the proliferation and aggregation of dermal cells. In vivo, when SHED and skin cells of C57 mice were subcutaneously co-transplanted to nude mice, more hair was formed than skin cells without SHED. To further explore the molecular mechanism, epidermal and dermal cells were freshly extracted and co-cultured with SHED. Then several signaling molecules in hair follicle regeneration were detected and we found that the expression of Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) and Glioma-associated oncogene 1 (Gli1) was up-regulated. It seems that SHED may boost the prosperity of hairs by increase Shh/Gli1 pathway, which brings new perspectives in tissue engineering and damaged tissue repairing.
Entities:
Keywords:
Sonic Hedgehog; cell interaction; hair regeneration; stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth; transplantation
Regeneration of multiple tissues - including the skin, blood, stomach, and intestines
- is maintained by stem cells
. In skin, slow-cycling and relatively undifferentiated stem cells exist
within a niche known as the bulge, located below the sebaceous gland in the outer
root sheath of the hair follicle
. Hair follicle is an important structure regulating hair cycling process and
this developmental process occurs over the total lifetime of a mammal, well beyond
the organogenesis of other systems (e.g., the cycling lifetime of the ovary or endometrium)
. This cyclic regeneration is thought to require many cellular signals of
morphogenetic and regenerating systems, among which, the intimate
epithelial-mesenchymal interactions is the most fundamental basics
. Therefore, we suspect that the transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells
from another source into the microenvironment of hair stem cells may have an effect
on hair follicle stem cells (HFSCs) and then eventually affect hair
regeneration.Hair regeneration is a normal physiological process, and improvements in this process
may help halt the excessive hair shedding progression. In recent years, with the
increasingly fierce social competition and work pressure, excessive hair shedding or
hair loss becomes an increasingly serious problem. Lots of drugs for the treatment
of hair loss have been developed, including minoxidil
. However, many of the drugs have obvious side effects or limited effect, for
example, minoxidil can cause rapid heart rate, arrhythmia, and skin flushing.
Effective methods for treating hair loss still needed. So far, there has been no
research on promoting hair regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells. This peer
research may bring a new perspective for hair follicle reconstruction and hair
growth.Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) are considered to be
mesenchymal stem cells, derived from neural crest, and can differentiate into
osteoblasts, chondrocytes, hepatocytes, and neuron-like cells under appropriate conditions
. SHED were discovered in 2003, since then they have received extensive
attention due to their convenience in obtaining, low immunogenicity and no ethical
issues in experiment
. The morphogenesis of teeth and hair follicles share many similarities. Both
processes involve the interaction between mesenchymal cells and epidermal cells and
finally result in a relatively independent organ
.In this study, we transplanted SHED along with C57BL/6 mice skin cells into nude mice
to investigate whether external stem cells could interact with hair follicle cells
and promote the hair regeneration in vivo.
Materials and Methods
Animals
7-week-old male nude (BALB/c) mice, 1-day-old and 7-week-old male C57BL/6 mice
were purchased from Peking University Medical College, China. Experimental
animals were cared with free water and all animal experiments were completed in
the laboratory of animal science department of Peking University Medical
College.
Isolation and Culture of SHED
Normal exfoliated human deciduous incisors were collected from 8 to 12 years old
children gifted from People’s Liberation Army No. 307 Hospital. The cells were
isolated and digested to obtain single cells according to the method established
by Gronthos
. Modified steps are as flows: (1) Cleaning: The teeth were immersed in
iodine and 75% ethanol for 30 s for disinfection. The sterilized teeth were
washed several times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Biological Industries,
Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel); (2) Separation: Knock the crown, grasp the pulp
tissue and cut the pulp tissue at the length of about 1 mm from the apex; (3)
Digestion: The pulp tissue was cut as much as possible digested in a solution of
3 mg/mL collagenase Ⅰ (Sigma-Aldrich Corp, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 4 mg/mL
dispase (Solarbio, Beijing, China) for about 2 h at 37°C. Gently shake the
digestive solution every 5 min to allow the tissue to be fully digested until no
visible tissue blocks are existed; (4) Seeding: The single cells were obtained
by centrifuging at 1200 rpm for 10 min. Collagenase Ⅰ was completely removed,
and the cells were cultured in Dulbecco Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Biological
Industries, Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel) containing 15% Fetal bovine serum (FBS)
(Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel) and 1%
penicillin-streptomycin solution (Caisson, Smithfield, UT, USA). The
non-adherent cells were removed by changing medium. According to the results of
flow cytometry (Fig.
1A), the sixth- and seventh-passage SHED were used for all
experiments.
Figure 1.
Identification and characterization of SHED (A) Surface
markers of extracted SHED. Flow cytometric analysis showed that isolated
cell population highly expressed CD73, CD90, and CD105 while it nearly
didn’t express CD14, CD34, and CD45. Isotype samples were used as
negative control to delineate positive areas (marked with a horizontal
line in the figure.); (B) Osteogenic of SHED. Alizarin red staining of
SHED were applied after osteogenic induction for 2–4 weeks. Control
group was cultured for the same time in complete medium and stained with
Alizarin red; (C) Adipogenic induction of SHED. Oil red staining of SHED
were applied after adipogenic induction for 3–4 weeks. Control group was
cultured for the same time in complete medium and stained with Oil red;
(D) Chondrogenic induction of SHED. Alcian staining of SHED were applied
after chondrogenic induction for 3–4 weeks. Control group was cultured
for the same time in complete medium and stained with Alcian; (E) Neural
induction of SHED. After SHED were induced in neural differentiation
medium (EGF/FGF/NGF/GDNF, 10mg/ml respectively) for 10 days, the neural
stem cell marker nestin was detected. The antibody of nestin produces
green fluorescence while DAPI binds to the nucleus and produces blue
fluorescence; (F) Transmission Electron Microscope of SHED. SHED were
made into cell suspension and the SEM picture showed the morphology,
size and distribution of the cells; (G) Cell proliferation curve of
SHED. After SHED were seeded into the plate, the absorbance is measured
once a day, and the cell viability is [A(Dn)-A(blank)] /
[A(D1)-A(blank)] × 100%. “A” represent the absorbance, “Dn” represents
the Nth day, n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
Identification and characterization of SHED (A) Surface
markers of extracted SHED. Flow cytometric analysis showed that isolated
cell population highly expressed CD73, CD90, and CD105 while it nearly
didn’t express CD14, CD34, and CD45. Isotype samples were used as
negative control to delineate positive areas (marked with a horizontal
line in the figure.); (B) Osteogenic of SHED. Alizarin red staining of
SHED were applied after osteogenic induction for 2–4 weeks. Control
group was cultured for the same time in complete medium and stained with
Alizarin red; (C) Adipogenic induction of SHED. Oil red staining of SHED
were applied after adipogenic induction for 3–4 weeks. Control group was
cultured for the same time in complete medium and stained with Oil red;
(D) Chondrogenic induction of SHED. Alcian staining of SHED were applied
after chondrogenic induction for 3–4 weeks. Control group was cultured
for the same time in complete medium and stained with Alcian; (E) Neural
induction of SHED. After SHED were induced in neural differentiation
medium (EGF/FGF/NGF/GDNF, 10mg/ml respectively) for 10 days, the neural
stem cell marker nestin was detected. The antibody of nestin produces
green fluorescence while DAPI binds to the nucleus and produces blue
fluorescence; (F) Transmission Electron Microscope of SHED. SHED were
made into cell suspension and the SEM picture showed the morphology,
size and distribution of the cells; (G) Cell proliferation curve of
SHED. After SHED were seeded into the plate, the absorbance is measured
once a day, and the cell viability is [A(Dn)-A(blank)] /
[A(D1)-A(blank)] × 100%. “A” represent the absorbance, “Dn” represents
the Nth day, n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
Flow Cytometry Analysis
Cell surface expression of CD14, CD34, CD45, CD73, CD90, and CD105 (Sino
Biological, Beijing, China) was tested using flow cytometry. SHED were washed
twice with cold PBS and stained with indicated PE-, PC5.5 or FITC-conjugated Abs
for 30 min on ice at dark room. Samples were examined on an Accuri C6 flow
cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lake, NJ, USA). Data were analyzed using
FlowJo7.6.1 analysis software.
Cell Proliferation Viability Assays
SHED (passage 5) were seeded into 96-well plates, and the cell viability was
tested every day by using CCK-8 (Solarbio, Beijing, China). After CCK-8 was
added, the cells were incubated at 37°C for 1.5 hours and then the absorbance at
560 nm was measured. The blank group contained only medium and CCK-8, and the
other groups contained cells, medium and CCK-8. The calculation formula for cell
viability is A(Dn)-A(blank)/A(D1)-A(blank)×100%. “A” represent the absorbance,
“Dn” represents the Nth day, n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
Neurogenic Induction
SHED (passage 5) were seeded into 6-well plate and the induction fluid contains
neural differentiation factors (EGF/FGF/NGF/GDNF, 10 mg/mL respectively). After
10 days of induction, SHED were used to detect the expression of nestin, a
marker for neural stem (or progenitor) cells. The primary antibody of nestin has
a green fluorescent label and can identify positive cells after co-localized
with the nucleus stained by DAPI.
Osteogenic Induction
Osteogenic induction of SHED were followed by the Instruction manual of
osteogenic differentiation medium Kit (Cyagen, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province,
China). Alizarin red staining was applied after induction for 2–4 weeks.
Adipogenic Induction
Adipogenic induction of SHED were followed by the Instruction manual of
adipogenic differentiation medium Kit (Cyagen, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province,
China). Oil red staining was applied after induction for 3–4 weeks.
chondrogenic Induction
Chondrogenic induction of SHED were followed by the Instruction manual of
chondrogenic differentiation medium Kit (Cyagen, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province,
China). Alcian staining was applied after induction for 3–4 weeks.
Morphological Analysis of SHED
SHED were collected and washed by PBS for 3 times, and cells were collected by
centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 min each time. 4% paraformaldehyde (Servicebio,
China) was used to fix the cells at room temperature for 15 min. After that, the
cells were put on the carbon-coated copper grid, stained with 3% phosphotungstic
acid (Solarbio, China) and washed away. Then the copper grid was placed in a
shady room for 24 hours to dry. Finally the morphology of the cells was examined
on a transmission electron microscope (TEM, HT7700 Exalens, Hitachi, Japan) at
an accelerating voltage of 100 kV.
Isolation of C57BL/6 Mice Skin Cells
One-day-old C57BL/6 mice were sacrificed by neck dissection, and the back skin
was carefully peeled off with sterile forceps. Subcutaneous fat was removed from
the skins with a scalpel and the whole skin was placed with dermis down in PBS
containing 0.2% dispase overnight at 4°C. The tissue after dispase treatment was
separated into epidermis and dermis. The epidermis was digested in 0.25% trypsin
(Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel) at 4°C for 30 min while
dermis was digested in 0.2% collagenase Ⅰ at 37°C for 1.5 h. Subsequently, the
cells were filtered with strainers (70 μm, Corning, Tewksbury, MA, USA).
Cell Co-culture
For SHED group, SHED were seeded in the upper layer of the Transwell chamber, and
freshly isolated dermal cells of C57BL/6 mice were seeded in the lower layer of
the Transwell chamber. For control group, only dermal cells of C57BL/6 mice were
seeded in the lower layer of the Transwell chamber (the upper layer contained no
cell). The medium was DMEM/F12 (Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit Haemek,
Israel) containing 15% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. Each well
contained 1 × 105 cells.In experiments to explore molecular mechanisms, freshly isolated epidermal and
dermal cells were placed in the lower layer of the transwell while SHED were
placed in the upper layer. The remaining conditions were the same as above. The
co-cultivation lasted for 3 days, and then the total RNA of the lower mixed cell
was extracted for RT-qPCR.
Transplantation
The 7-week-old nude mice were purchased. All procedures were performed on
anaesthetized animals and the cells were subcutaneously injected into the back
skin of the nude mice (6 injection sites on each mouse). In order to eliminate
the individual differences of different mice, the back of each mouse was divided
into left and right sides. The left side was the injection site of the control
group while the right was the injection site of the SHED group. In the control
group each injection site containing 1∼5 × 106 skin cells while in
the SHED group each site containing 1∼5 × 106 skin cells and 1∼5 ×
106 SHED. Skin cells included epidermal cells and dermal cells
and the ratio is 1: 2. The experiment totally enrolled 5 mice.
Histochemical Analysis
Dehydrated skin tissue from injection site of nude mice was fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde and embedded in tissue freezing medium (Leica Biosystems,
Shanghai, China). The sliced skin was stained in hematoxylin-eosin (HE).
C57BL/6 Mice Surface Smear Experiment
The 7-week-old C57BL/6 mice were randomly recruited in Minoxidil group (positive
control), SHED group (test group) and saline group (negative control), and then
labeled with ear tags. Each group included 3 mice. The back hair of the mice was
removed with a razor and a mild depilatory cream. The reagents (commercially
available minoxidil tincture for Minoxidil group, SHED extracts for SHED group
and saline for saline group) were smeared at the bald area of C57BL/6 mice once
a day for 7 days. Photos were taken to record results. The bald area was
determined by the statistical gray value through Image J software.
RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR
The total RNA of skin cells was extracted by the TRIzon method. Briefly, after
the cells were cleaved by TRIzon (CWBIO, Beijing, China), chloroform was added.
Then the mixture was centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min, after that the upper
aqueous phase was token and isopropanol was added, after standing still the
precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 12000 rpm, and then re-dissolved
with absolute ethanol. To prepare cDNA, total RNA was reverse transcribed using
random hexamer primers (Accurate Biology, China). Real-time PCR was performed on
an OneStepPlus (Funglyn, Canada) machine using SYBR Green master mix (Beyotime,
China). Primer pairs (Table 1) were designed to work at the same settings: 95°C
for 2 min, 40X (95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 20 s, 72°C for 30 s). Differences were
quantified based on the ΔΔCt method.
Statistical Analysis
The results were shown as mean ± SD. For the data statistics of the two
experimental results, T-test was applied to calculate the variance. And for the
data statistics of three groups and above, ANOVA-test was applied to obtain the
variance between the groups. SPSS V21.0 was used to calculate all results. The
significance level less than 0.05 were considered as statistically
significant.
Results
Isolation and identification of SHED
After the cells were extracted from the medulla tissue of 6–12 years old
children’s teeth, flow cytometry was used to detect the specific surface markers
of SHED, meanwhile neurogenic, osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic
induction were conducted to test the stemness of cells. The proliferation
ability of stem cells within 7 days and the morphology under electron microscope
were also tested.The same differentiation antigen recognized by monoclonal antibodies from
different cells is called cluster of differentiation (CD). CD14 is a
glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored receptor and is known to act as a
co-receptor for multiple Toll-like receptors (TLR) on the cell surface that
enhances innate immune responses
. CD34 is mainly expressed in stem cells derived from hematopoietic
origin, and acts as a growth factor receptor to regulate early hematopoiesis
. CD45 is an evolutionarily highly conserved receptor protein tyrosine
phosphatase, which is only expressed on all nucleated cells of the hematopoietic system
. CD73, also known as Ecto-5’-nucleotidase, is a ubiquitously expressed
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-immobilized glycoprotein that can convert
extracellular adenosine 5’-monophosphate into adenosine
. CD90, also known as Thy-1, is a member of the cell adhesion molecule
immunoglobulin superfamily, usually used as a surface marker for mesenchymal
stem cells that has an important regulatory role in osteogenic differentiation
. CD105 (Endoglin) is a type I transmembrane protein, which is reported to
induce endothelial cell activation and proliferation
. SHED, as neural crest-derived mesenchymal stem cells, are define as
highly express CD73, CD90, and CD105 while lowly express CD14, CD34, and CD45.
Our results from flow cytometry analysis showed that the positive rate of CD73,
CD90, and CD105 was higher than 99%, while the positive rate of CD34 and CD45
was lower than 1%, and the positive rate of CD14 was lower than 4%, as Fig. 1A indicated. The
fluorescent confocal pictures of the surface markers of stem cells were shown in
the supplement materials (S.1). The results were consistent with the flow
cytometry test. Flow cytometric identification of cell surface markers showed
that the cells we isolated were indeed SHED. In order to detect the stemness of
cells, we induced neurogenic, osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic
differentiation of SHED.When the osteogenic differentiation was induced for about 4 weeks, alizarin red
staining was performed and the results showed in Fig. 1B. Obvious dark red calcium
nodules and red bone matrix were observed under the microscope (the bone matrix
generally appeared before the formation of the bone nodules) indicating the
isolated cells had osteogenic differentiation potential. Adipogenic
differentiation was induced for 3 weeks, and deep red lipid droplets could be
seen after oil red staining. The results are shown in Fig. 1C. Chondrogenic differentiation
was confirmed by Alcian staining after 3 weeks of induction which was shown in
Fig. 1D. Ten days
after neural induction, SHED expressed neural stem cell marker nestin. After
incubating with nestin antibody which contains green fluorescent label, positive
cells could be seen under a fluorescence microscope as showed in Fig. 1E. The
four-direction induction of SHED proves its high stemness.In cell proliferation viability assays, SHED continued to proliferate in the
first five days and reached the plateau after reaching the highest number on the
sixth day as we can see from Fig. 1G.TEM pictures showed the distribution and size of SHED. It can be seen from the
Fig. 1F that the
size and distribution of SHED were relatively uniform, and the cell diameter was
500–800 nm in the suspended state.
SHED Promotes the Growth of Dermal Cells in Vitro
Based on our guess, we first explored whether there is an interaction between
mesenchymal stem cells from two sources. We co-cultured SHED with freshly
extracted dermal cells of C57BL/6 suckling mice in a Transwell chamber.After SHED and dermal cells were co-cultured for 3 days in Transwell chamber, the
state of dermal cells was shown as Fig. 2A. The pore size of Transwell
chamber is 0.4 μm. SHED were cultured in the upper layer and dermal cells of
C57BL/6 mice was cultured at the bottle of the chamber (Fig. 2B). The cells of two layers were
not in direct contact, but they could interact by secreting cytokines or
signaling molecule. Three repetitions were done for each group.
Figure 2.
SHED promote the growth of dermal cells in vitro (A)
Freshly extracted C57BL/6 mouse dermal cells co-cultured with SHED for 3
days in a transwell chamber (left), and dermal cells without SHED
co-culture (right); (B) Schematic diagram of co-cultivation of cells in
Tranwell chamber. The gap between the upper and lower chambers is
smaller than the cell diameter, and the two layers of cells can only
communicate through signal molecules or cytokines; (C, D) Statistical
results of the suspended and adherent cells in (A). Significance was
calculated using t-test, P < 0.05 *,
P < 0.01 **, P < 0.001 ***,
P < 0.0001****.
SHED promote the growth of dermal cells in vitro (A)
Freshly extracted C57BL/6 mouse dermal cells co-cultured with SHED for 3
days in a transwell chamber (left), and dermal cells without SHED
co-culture (right); (B) Schematic diagram of co-cultivation of cells in
Tranwell chamber. The gap between the upper and lower chambers is
smaller than the cell diameter, and the two layers of cells can only
communicate through signal molecules or cytokines; (C, D) Statistical
results of the suspended and adherent cells in (A). Significance was
calculated using t-test, P < 0.05 *,
P < 0.01 **, P < 0.001 ***,
P < 0.0001****.The results calculated in Fig.
2C, D showed
that the number of dermal cells in the experimental group co-cultured with SHED
was significantly higher than that in the control group (both suspended cells
and adherent cells), and there were cell aggregation in the experimental group.
This phenomenon suggested that SHED could promote the proliferation of a variety
of dermal cells and adherence of dermal cells by paracrine.
SHED Extracts Promotes Hair Regeneration in Vitro
The indirect communication between SHED and dermal cells made us realize that
SHED may secrete some signal molecules or cytokines to promote the proliferation
of dermal cells. In order to explore the role of SHED in hair regeneration, we
made a cream using cracked SHED and applied it to the depilatory area on the
back of C57BL/6 mice. The smear experiment lasted for 1 week, each mouse smeared
once a day. The experimental design of this part was shown in Fig. 3A. At the same
time, commercially available minoxidil and physiological saline were used as the
positive control group and the negative control group respectively.
Figure 3.
SHED promote hair regeneration in vitro (A) The schematic
diagram of the smearing experiment. After the mice had adapted to the
environment for a period of time, the back hair of mice were removed on
D0 and the reagent were applied once a day during D0-D7. Pictures were
taken to record the hair growth each day. The experiment ends on D12;
(B) The percentage of the bald area to the total depilation area in (C)
on D12. Compared with the saline group, SHED and minoxidil were
significantly reduced, while there was no significant difference between
SHED and minoxidil; (C) Record photos of C57BL/6 mice during the smear
experiment after depilation. The total depilation area was marked with a
black line, and the bald area was marked with a red line. Bald areas
were distinguished by statistical gray value. Significance was
calculated using ANOVA-test, P < 0.05 *,
P < 0.01 **, P < 0.001 ***,
P < 0.0001 ****.
SHED promote hair regeneration in vitro (A) The schematic
diagram of the smearing experiment. After the mice had adapted to the
environment for a period of time, the back hair of mice were removed on
D0 and the reagent were applied once a day during D0-D7. Pictures were
taken to record the hair growth each day. The experiment ends on D12;
(B) The percentage of the bald area to the total depilation area in (C)
on D12. Compared with the saline group, SHED and minoxidil were
significantly reduced, while there was no significant difference between
SHED and minoxidil; (C) Record photos of C57BL/6 mice during the smear
experiment after depilation. The total depilation area was marked with a
black line, and the bald area was marked with a red line. Bald areas
were distinguished by statistical gray value. Significance was
calculated using ANOVA-test, P < 0.05 *,
P < 0.01 **, P < 0.001 ***,
P < 0.0001 ****.In vitro smear experiment, there were significant differences in the regenerated
hair area among the three groups on D12 (Fig. 3C). The depilated area on the back
of the mouse was marked with a black line, and the bald area on D12 was marked
with a red line. The area calculated in Fig. 3B is the percentage of the bald
area to the depilated area. The percentage of bald areas in the saline group was
the largest, which was significantly different from the minoxidil group and the
SHED group. Compared with the positive control group (minoxidil), there was no
significant difference in the SHED group. The results indicated that compared
with the saline group, SHED extracts could shorten the cycle of hair follicle
regeneration and promote the hair regeneration, showing a similar effect to
minoxidil.
SHED promotes the Hair de Novo Regeneration in Vivo
To determine if SHED could exert an effect in vivo, the skin cells (both
epidermis and dermis) of C57BL/6 mice were subcutaneously transplanted into the
nude mice for 2–3 weeks, and the bulges were formed under the epidermis of the
nude mice. We checked the hair development in the tissues of the injection site
on the 14th (D14) and 19th days (D19) after the injection of the cells (Fig. 4A). On D14, a small
amount of short hair had formed in the injection sites (Fig. 4B). Via calculation we found that
the number of hairs formed at the injection site where SHED were added was
significantly more than that of the control group (Fig. 4D). On D19 after the injection, we
checked the hair growth at the injection site again (Fig. 4C). At this time, the hair formed
at the injection site added with SHED had grown significantly, compared with the
control group, the number of hairs in the experimental group increased to 1.5
times. and the length of the hair shaft has also increased (the length is more
than 1 cm). The number of hairs in the control group was significantly less than
that in the SHED group, and the hair shaft length was also shorter. The
statistics are shown in Fig.
4E.
Figure 4.
Hair de novo regeneration in nude mice (A) Schematic
diagram of nude mouse hair transplantation experiment. Nude mice were
subcutaneously transplanted with mixed epidermal and dermal cells of
C57BL/6 mice on D0, then the nude mice were sacrificed on D14 and D19,
and the development of hair follicle was checked; (B) The cells
transplanted subcutaneously in nude mice developed into hair on D14. The
injection sites co-transplanted with SHED contained more hair; (C) Hair
development of transplanted cells in nude mice on D19. Compared with
D14, both the length and number of hair had increased. There were still
significant differences between the SHED group and the control group.
Compared with the control group, the number of hairs in the SHED group
increased to 1.5 times; (D-E) Statistical results of (B) and (C). The
hair under the skin was counted after being pulled out; (F)
Microstructure of nude mice’s own hair (a) and hair formed by
transplanted cells (b) after HE staining. The epidermis and dermis were
separated by a white dotted line, and the epidermis showed darker color.
The outline of the hair follicle was circled by a red dotted line
pointed by a yellow arrow. The hair formed by nude mice had
directionality, which grew from the dermis layer to the epidermis layer
(a), while the hair growth formed by the transplanted cells had no
directionality (b). Significance was calculated using
t-test, P < 0.05*.
Hair de novo regeneration in nude mice (A) Schematic
diagram of nude mouse hair transplantation experiment. Nude mice were
subcutaneously transplanted with mixed epidermal and dermal cells of
C57BL/6 mice on D0, then the nude mice were sacrificed on D14 and D19,
and the development of hair follicle was checked; (B) The cells
transplanted subcutaneously in nude mice developed into hair on D14. The
injection sites co-transplanted with SHED contained more hair; (C) Hair
development of transplanted cells in nude mice on D19. Compared with
D14, both the length and number of hair had increased. There were still
significant differences between the SHED group and the control group.
Compared with the control group, the number of hairs in the SHED group
increased to 1.5 times; (D-E) Statistical results of (B) and (C). The
hair under the skin was counted after being pulled out; (F)
Microstructure of nude mice’s own hair (a) and hair formed by
transplanted cells (b) after HE staining. The epidermis and dermis were
separated by a white dotted line, and the epidermis showed darker color.
The outline of the hair follicle was circled by a red dotted line
pointed by a yellow arrow. The hair formed by nude mice had
directionality, which grew from the dermis layer to the epidermis layer
(a), while the hair growth formed by the transplanted cells had no
directionality (b). Significance was calculated using
t-test, P < 0.05*.We then explored the hair structure formed at the injection site. The bulges of
injection sites were sliced and stained with HE, the dermis and epidermis were
separated by a white dotted line in the picture, and the epidermis was densely
stained (Fig. 4F).
Since nude mice would grow sparse white hair themselves, we selected C57 mice
with black hair as the donor for epidermal cell transplantation. The black hair
generated at the transplanted site can be distinguished from the hair of the
nude mouse itself. In addition, from the results of section staining, the hair
formed by the nude mice grew from the dermis to the epidermis (Fig. 4Fa), while the
hairs formed by the transplanted skin cells were disordered and grew from the
epidermis to the dermis (Fig.
4F).
SHED Regulate Hair Regeneration Mainly through Shh/Gli1 Signaling
Pathway
The previous results of our work showed that SHED do affect hair regeneration,
and we wonder whether it is to promote hair de novo regeneration in vivo or to
promote periodic regeneration in vitro. This is a very interesting phenomenon.
In order to clarify the underlying mechanism, we further explored how SHED
promoted hair regeneration.The mechanisms of hair de novo regeneration and cyclic regeneration have been
studied relatively mature. Therefore, we selected several important molecules
reported in the literature for PPI analysis (Figure 5A). Then three molecules with
the highest PPI score (Shh, Gli1, Ptch1) and three other important molecules
(Sir7, MAPK, Lgr4) reported in the literature were used as detection indicators.
By detecting the expression of mRNA in the mixture of freshly extracted
epidermal and dermal cells, we found that the expression of genes that promote
hair regeneration in the mixed cells co-cultured with SHED were significantly
higher than those in the control group (Figure 5B). In particular, the gene
expression of Shh/Gli1 signaling pathway has increased dramatically by SHED.
Figure 5.
The molecular mechanism of SHED regulating hair
regeneration (A) PPI Analysis of protein network interaction
related to hair regeneration. Genes are marked as circles of different
sizes and colors according to their scores. The molecular functions and
scores of these genes were listed in the table below; (B) The mRNA
expression of hair regeneration genes in SHED and control group. The
detected genes include the three highest-scoring genes in the PPI
analysis and the important hair regeneration genes reported in the
literature. Significance was calculated using ANOVA-test,
P < 0.05 *, P < 0.01 **,
P < 0.001 ***, P < 0.0001
****.
The molecular mechanism of SHED regulating hair
regeneration (A) PPI Analysis of protein network interaction
related to hair regeneration. Genes are marked as circles of different
sizes and colors according to their scores. The molecular functions and
scores of these genes were listed in the table below; (B) The mRNA
expression of hair regeneration genes in SHED and control group. The
detected genes include the three highest-scoring genes in the PPI
analysis and the important hair regeneration genes reported in the
literature. Significance was calculated using ANOVA-test,
P < 0.05 *, P < 0.01 **,
P < 0.001 ***, P < 0.0001
****.Shh signal transmission is controlled by the membrane receptor Ptch on the target
cell. The receptor Ptch is encoded by the tumor suppressor gene Patched, which
can directly bind to the ligand and play a negative regulatory role on Shh
signaling. The addition of SHED kept Ptch unchanged and up-regulated the
expression of Shh, indicating that SHED may activate the Shh signaling pathway
through other pathways. When the Shh signaling pathway is activated, its
downstream transcription factor Gli1 will be up-regulated and enter the nucleus
to activate downstream target gene transcription. The finally activated signal
pathway regulates skin cells including hair follicles, which manifests as hair
regeneration.
Discussion
Since 2000, dental stem cells showed powerful application potential in multiple
tissue repairing
. The similarities in the development of teeth and hair follicles sparked us
to explore the cellular interactions between the two tissues. Hence, we put dermal
cells together with SHED in Transwell chamber where they were not in direct contact,
but could communicate indirectly through paracrine signal moleculars or other
cytokines. Surprisingly we found dermal cells co-cultured with SHED had better
proliferation and more clusters compared with the control group, which implied that
SHED may secret some important molecules which played a part in dermal cell
proliferation. Various nutritional factors secreted by SHED have been reported to
play a key role in tissue repairing, include bone tissues
, liver tissues
, but there are few reports spotlight on hair. Herein we believe these growth
factors may have a positive effect in hair follicle regulation via anti-apoptosis
and provide nutritious microenvironment.In order to determine whether extracellular factors secreted by SHED have effect on
dermal cells or even hair regeneration, we smeared the extract of SHED onto the
depilated dorsal skin of C57BL/6 mice. Minoxidil is an FDA-approved drug for the
treatment of hair loss hence it was used as a positive control in our experiment.
The results indicated SHED group had less bald area compared with the control group,
which mean that SHED extracts could shorten hair regeneration cycle and boost hair
regeneration.In previous reports, chemical reagents had a certain effect on hair regeneration.
Among them, minoxidil has a better hair growth effect and was approved as a drug
decades ago. However minoxidil and its inactive ingredient propylene glycol can
induce allergic contact dermatitis which is a severe side effect commonly appeared
in chemical drugs
. SHED are a kind of mesenchymal stem cells in the human body with low immunogenicity
. Therefore, based on the similar effect of promoting hair regeneration, SHED
have become a more potential therapeutic drug due to its better safety.While SHED showed apparent effect on hair regeneration in vitro, we would like to
further explore its role in vivo. Hereafter we injected skin cells (include dermal
cells and epidermal cells) with or without SHED into nude mice and after 2 weeks new
hairs grew out. It was found that skin cells injected with SHED produced more hair
which may due to the secretion of certain factors by SHED that promoted the increase
of dermal papilla cells (DPs) resulting in a larger number of hair follicles. Recent
studies have shown that the conditioned medium of dental stem cells can
significantly increase the number of hair follicles in the growth phase and
stimulate hair growth rapidly which is consistent with our research results
.To further explore the molecular mechanism, we co-cultured SHED with epidermal and
dermal mixed cells through Transwell to detect the expression of hair
regeneration-related genes. Through PPI analysis, we found several key genes in hair
regeneration, including Shh, Pach1, and Gli1. In addition, we also include the
reported important genes (Sirt7, MAPK, Hoxc and Lgr4) that regulate the hair cycle
as detection indicators. Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signals regulate the proliferation and
development patterns of many tissues including HF
. In the Shh signal pathway of hair follicle development, Ptch1, as the
receptor of Shh, mainly exerts a tumor suppressor effect and negatively regulates
the Shh signal pathway
. Gli1 is the nuclear factor of Shh signal transduction. Shh/Gli regulates the
development of hair follicles in embryonic development and adult animals, and
affects the circulation and growth of adult hair follicles by promoting the
telogen-to-anagen transition of follicular cells
. In our experimental results, SHED did not affect the expression of Ptch1 in
the epidermis and dermis mixture, while Shh and Gli1 were both upregulated. This
indicates that SHED activate the Shh signaling pathway to promote hair regeneration
and periodic circulation through another pathway (may up-regulate Smo, another
positive regulator of Shh) instead of reducing the expression of negative regulator
Ptch1. We believe that regulating effect of SHED on hair regeneration is
multifaceted, which is also a major feature of biologically active drugs that are
different from single-component chemical drugs. Therefore, in addition to the Shh
pathway, we also tested the expression of a variety of important genes related to
hair regeneration. Sirt7 is a newly discovered molecule related to the periodic
circulation of hair. Research by Guo Li et al
. showed that the upregulation of Sirt7 can promote the transition of hair
from telogen phase to anagen phase, and accelerate hair growth. MAPK1 is a classic
gene that regulates hair regeneration. It can promote the proliferation of HFSCs
. Hoxc gene expression in the dermis of adult skin is closely related to the
regional HF regeneration pattern. Zhou Yu et al
. found that a single Hoxc gene is sufficient to activate the dormant DPs
niches and promote regional HF regeneration by regulating Wnt signaling. Lgr4 is
also a factor that regulates the hair cycle. LGR4 promotes the normal hair cycle by
activating HF stem cells and affecting the activity of various signaling pathways
known to regulate HF stem cells
. In our experimental results, these signal molecules that promote the
proliferation of HFSCs and the transition of hair to the anagen phase are
significantly up-regulated, indicating that SHED achieve a positive regulation of
hair follicle regeneration through a variety of ways.In summary, we found that SHED could interact with dermal cells and regulate cell
proliferation in a paracrine manner; SHED extracts could boost hair regeneration at
the depilatory area on the back of C57 mice growth. Precisely speaking, SHED
extracts shortened the hair growth cycle of C57 mice; Co-transplantation of SHED and
skin cells of C57 mice could increase the number of newly formed hair in nude mice.
Although our experimental results showed that SHED had a benign effect on hair
regeneration, our pioneering research was not yet complete. More in-depth research
is needed to promote clinical applications. SHED have been proved effective in the
treatment of multiple oral diseases
and multiple tissue repairing (e.g., nervous tissue repairing
, bone tissue repairing
). With cautious optimism, it may have a wider application in hair
regeneration field.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental Material, sj-tif-1-cll-10.1177_09636897211042927 for Stem Cells from
Human Exfoliated Deciduous teeth Promote Hair Regeneration in Mouse by
Xiaoshuang Zhang, Tong Lei, Peng Chen, Lei Wang, Jian Wang, Donghui Wang,
Wenhuan Guo, Yabin Zhou, Quanhai Li and Hongwu Du in Cell Transplantation