| Literature DB >> 34633707 |
Maik Dreyer1, Daniel Cruz2,3, Ulrich Hagemann4, Patrick Zeller2,5, Markus Heidelmann4, Soma Salamon6, Joachim Landers6, Anna Rabe1, Klaus Friedel Ortega7, Sharif Najafishirtari1, Heiko Wende6, Nils Hartmann4, Axel Knop-Gericke2,3, Robert Schlögl2,3, Malte Behrens1,7.
Abstract
Perovskites are interesting oxidation catalysts due to their chemical flexibility enabling the tuning of several properties. In this work, we synthesized LaFe1-x Cox O3 catalysts by co-precipitation and thermal decomposition, characterized them thoroughly and studied their 2-propanol oxidation activity under dry and wet conditions to bridge the knowledge gap between gas and liquid phase reactions. Transient tests showed a highly active, unstable low-temperature (LT) reaction channel in conversion profiles and a stable, less-active high-temperature (HT) channel. Cobalt incorporation had a positive effect on the activity. The effect of water was negative on the LT channel, whereas the HT channel activity was boosted for x>0.15. The boost may originate from a slower deactivation rate of the Co3+ sites under wet conditions and a higher amount of hydroxide species on the surface comparing wet to dry feeds. Water addition resulted in a slower deactivation for Co-rich catalysts and higher activity in the HT channel state.Entities:
Keywords: 2-Propanol; LFCO; Oxidation; Oxygen Vacancies; Perovskite phases
Year: 2021 PMID: 34633707 PMCID: PMC9299464 DOI: 10.1002/chem.202102791
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemistry ISSN: 0947-6539 Impact factor: 5.020
Scheme 1Possible reactions during the gas‐phase 2‐propanol oxidation.
Figure 1(a) XRD patterns of the materials after calcination. (b) Zoom into the XRD patterns after calcination, indicating a secondary spinel phase for x>0.30. (c) Evolution of the lattice parameters from Rietveld refinements.
BET surface area determined by multi‐point BET plots, pore volumes determined at p/p0=0.99, pore sizes determined by the BJH method during desorption, and fractions of different phases derived from Rietveld refinements.
|
x= |
BET surface area / m2 g−1 |
Pore volume / cm3 g−1 |
Fraction orthorhombic perovskite / % |
Fraction rhombohedral perovskite / % |
Fraction spinel / % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.00 |
20.0 |
0.167 |
100 |
– |
– |
|
0.05 |
17.3 |
0.174 |
100 |
– |
– |
|
0.10 |
28.9 |
0.238 |
100 |
– |
– |
|
0.15 |
11.7 |
0.127 |
100 |
– |
– |
|
0.20 |
11.0 |
0.057 |
100 |
– |
– |
|
0.25 |
14.4 |
0.089 |
100 |
– |
– |
|
0.30 |
10.6 |
0.064 |
100 |
– |
– |
|
0.40 |
10.1 |
0.034 |
74 |
25 |
1 |
|
0.50 |
9.5 |
0.029 |
60 |
38 |
2 |
|
0.60 |
7.0 |
0.029 |
36 |
62 |
2 |
|
0.70 |
9.5 |
0.034 |
34 |
62 |
5 |
Figure 2Comparison of DRIFTS spectra at selected times during (a) adsorption and (b) desorption of 2‐propanol.
Figure 3Exemplary dataset of x=0.25 obtained from gas‐phase 2‐propanol oxidation consisting of conversions of 2‐propanol and oxygen (top row) and product yields (bottom row) during three consecutive runs. Filled symbols show data points during heating. Empty characters show the behavior during cooling.
Figure 4(a) 2‐Propanol conversions in dry feed. Solid and hollow symbols show data points during heating and during cooling, respectively. (b) T10 values during heating and cooling and T50 during cooling in dry feed plotted against the experimental Co content derived from AAS. (c) Surface‐area normalized 2‐propanol consumption rates at 150 °C during dry feed heating. (d) Surface‐area normalized 2‐propanol consumption rates at 250 °C during dry feed cooling. (e) Surface‐area normalized acetone and CO2 formation rates at 250 °C during cooling. (f) Surface‐area normalized formation ratio of acetone/(acetone+CO2) at T50 during cooling. Horizontal lines indicate the formation of the single orthorhombic perovskite phase at low Co contents and the three phase‐mixture at higher Co contents.
Figure 5(a) 2‐Propanol conversions in wet feed. Solid and hollow symbols show data points during heating and during cooling, respectively. (b) Differences between T10 during heating cooling and T50 during cooling for Tx dry and Tx wet differences (Δ=dry‐wet) plotted against the experimental Co content derived from AAS. (c) Differences between surface‐area normalized 2‐propanol consumption rate at 150 °C during heating. (d) Surface‐area normalized 2‐propanol consumption rate differences at 250 °C during cooling. (e) Differences in surface‐area normalized acetone and CO2 formation rates at 250 °C during cooling. (f) The difference in the ratio of acetone/(acetone+CO2) at T50 during cooling. Horizontal lines indicate the formation of the single orthorhombic perovskite phase at low Co contents and the three phase‐mixture at higher Co contents.
Figure 6(a) HAADF‐STEM micrograph of x=0.30 in the as‐prepared state. (b) HAADF‐STEM micrograph of x=0.30 in the post‐catalysis state. The dots on the lattice of both subfigures show the LaFeO3 structure along the [110] direction, Fe ions in blue and La ions in red.
Figure 7Operando NAP‐XPS during 2‐propanol oxidation under steady state conditions (a) Co 2p spectra (hν=930 eV; KE=150 eV). (b) Deconvoluted O 1s spectra (hν=680 eV; KE=150 eV). (c) Deconvoluted C 1s spectra (hν=430 eV; KE=150 eV). Top, middle, and bottom panel show: the oxidative pretreatment, dry and wet feed conditions.