| Literature DB >> 34633246 |
Barbara Peric1,2, Spela Leiler3, Gregor Hawlina2,3, Boris Jancar1, Marko Snoj1,2, Andraz Perhavec1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with conjuctival melanoma (CjM). STUDYEntities:
Keywords: conjuctival melanoma; lymphadenectomy; sentinel node biopsy; survival
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34633246 PMCID: PMC8512233 DOI: 10.1177/10732748211042116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Control ISSN: 1073-2748 Impact factor: 3.302
Clinicopathological characteristics of the 2005–2016 CjM cohort.
| AJCC 8th pT | T1a | T1b | T2a | T2b | Unknown | T3a | T3b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | 15 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| PAM present | 8 | / | 1 | / | / | 0 | 0 |
| Mitoses >1/mm2 | 4 | / | 1 | / | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Ulceration | |||||||
| Yes | 2 | / | 1 | / | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| No | 11 | / | 1 | / | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown | 2 | / | 0 | / | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| SLNB | |||||||
| Yes | 8 | / | 1 | / | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| No | 7 | / | 1 | / | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| SLN positive | |||||||
| Yes | 1 | / | 1 | / | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No | 7 | / | 0 | / | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Reg | 1 | / | 0 | / | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Local | 1 | / | 0 | / | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Distant | 2 | / | 0 | / | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CjM death | 2 | / | 0 | / | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Figure 1.Survival of Slovenian CjM patients.
SLN procedure for CjM; summary of the results.
| Author, title | Perić | Pfeiffer et al. (2017) [including patients from Savar et al. (2009)] | Esmaeli et al. (2019) | Cohen et al. (2013) | Brouwer et al. (2018) | Wong et al. (2014) meta-analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up | 65.3 (median, months) | 63 (median, months) | 46.6 (median, months) | 20 (median, months) | 70.2 (mean, months) | 1.9 (mean, years) |
| No. of cases | 24 | 31 (out of all 51 patients with ocular andexal melanoma) | 88 | 22 (4 with injection failure) | 70 | 56 (4 with injection failure) |
| Males | 7 (29%) | 21 (41%) | 32 (36%) | 11 (50%) | 35 (50%) | N/A |
| Females | 17 (71%) | 30 (59%) | 56 (64%) | 11 (50%) | 35 (50%) | N/A |
| Mean age at diagnosis (years) | 60 | 62 | 62 | 59 | 60.3 | Not specified |
| Location of tumour | Limbus 7/24 (29%), bulbar 13/24 (54%), tarsal 3/24 (12%), and unknown in 1/24 cases (4%) | Bulbar 27%, palpebral 10%, and both 8% (out of all 51 patients with ocular andexal melanoma) | Not specified | Non-epibulbar | Not specified | Not specified |
| Requirements for SLNB | Hist. invasive CjM + ulceration, no distant metastases | No signs of metastasis, >17 years, hist. confirmed CjM, >1 mm thick or ulceration | Not specified | >2 mm thick, unfavourable location (forniceal, caruncular or tarsal conjunctiva) and recurrent melanoma | Not performed by standard. Instead, US every 6 months and in case of susp. finding cytological examination | >1 mm, exclusion of regional and distant metastasis, and histological ulceration |
| No. of SLNBs | 14/24 (58%) | All | 31/88 (35%) | All | All | |
| SLNB positive | 2/14 (14%) | 4/31 (13%) (in CjM group) | 4/31 (13%) | 2/18 (11%) | 9/52 (17%) | |
| SLNB false negative | None | 2/27 (7%) | Not specified | None | 4/43 (9%) | |
| Injection failure | None | 1/51 (2%) | Not specified | 4/22 (4%) | 4/56 (7%) | |
| Complications of SLNB | Transient blue staining in patients where blue dye was used (8/14, 57%) and transient marginal mandibular nerve palsy (1/14, 7%) | Transient facial nerve palsy (6%), haematoma of the neck (2%), and stitch abscess (2%) | Not specified | Transient blue staining (23%) and transient facial nerve palsy (6%) | Transient blue staining (31%) and transient facial nerve palsy (6%) | |
| No. of local relapses | 4/24 (17%) | N/A | 14/88 (16%) | 20 (29%) | 40% (307/770) | |
| No. of regional relapses | 4/24 (17%) | 6/31 (19%) | 5/88 (6%) | 1/2 (50%) (from SLNB+) | 7 (10%) | 19% (140/734) |
| No. of systemic relapses | 4/24 (17%) | At least 1/31 | 16/88 (19%) | 5/22 (23%) | 9 (12%); 4/9 without prior regional disease | 19% (141/734) |
| Primary treatment | Wide local excision (24/24) followed by Sr90 brachytherapy (21/24) | Wide local excision | Not specified | Wide local excision (24/24) followed by adjuvant cryotherapy was performed in (12/22), β-radiotherapy (strontium 90) in 6/22, and MMC .04% (1/22) | Wide local excision followed by adjuvant cryotherapy (7/70), chemotherapy (1/70), ruthenium plaque (11/70), strontium brachytherapy (21/70), or iridium brachytherapy (2/70) | Wide excision (+/− adjuvant cryotherapy, topical chemotherapy, or radiotherapy) |
| SLN biopsy + lymphadectomy | 2 CLND | Not specified | 1st: Underwent superficial parotidectomy and radical dissection of the lymph node chain. 2nd: Palliative regional radiotherapy to the neck due to frailty. The patient died due to systemic CjM | Subsequent lymphadenectomy demonstrated benefits of prolonged distant disease-free survival and overall survival | ||
| Survival | 5-year OS: 72.5%, mean survival of 113 months (95% CI 88–138) | 5-year OS: 79% (out of all 51 patients with ocular andexal melanoma) | Positive SLN associated with increased risk of death from disease, HR = 6.24, 95% CI: 1.25–31.13 | 17/18 patients survived during the follow-up period, no 5-year survival reported | 5-year OS: 72%, melanoma-related survival 90% | 5-year OS: 74–86% |
| Conclusions | The benefits of performing SLN biopsy in CjM patients are questionable | SLN biopsy is safe and identifies nodal micrometastasis in approximately 20% of cases | Authors found a significant correlation between SLN status and disease-related death, highlighting the opportunity to offer additional treatment to patients with a positive SLN. | SLN biopsy is a safe procedure and should be considered for the staging of patients with high-risk conjunctival melanoma | Despite no use of SLN biopsy, recurrence rates are similar. Instead, US follow-up every 6 months has been performed | The role of lymphoscintigraphy and SLN biopsy is highly debatable to date, as improvement in survival with this technique has not yet been established |