Literature DB >> 34631236

Role of gamma angle in treatment planning of vestibular schwannoma in Gamma Knife: A retrospective study.

Ngangom Robert1, Manjul Tripathi2, Budhi Singh Yadav1.   

Abstract

Gamma angle plays a major role in Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) treatment planning. Selecting an appropriate gamma angle may help in mitigating unnecessary radiation exposure to organs at risk (OARs). The aims in GKRS of vestibular schwannoma (VS) is to deliver sufficient radiation to the tumor extending into internal auditory canal (IAC) while keeping basal turn of cochlea and brain stem away from 4 and 12 Gy radiation exposure, respectively. This study analyses the optimal gamma angle in GKRS for VS treatment planning. The study was performed using old MRI datasets of 16 patients of VS in Leksell GammaPlan version 10.1.1. T2 weighted contrast MRIs were used for the planning purposes. Three different plans were made for each patient at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70° using hybrid inverse planning technique. Dynamic shaping was used to achieve as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) doses to the cochlea without compromising target coverage (i.e. coverage of more than 97% of tumor volume). This comparative analysis shows minimal radiation exposure to cochlea for plans made at gamma angle 110° compared to 90° and 70°. Average percentage volume of cochlea receiving 4 Gy were 9.63 ± 12.32%, 6.19 ± 8.24%, and 25.25 ± 31.82% at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70°, respectively (one-way ANOVA p = 0.0247). The average selectivity indices were 83.44 ± 7.13, 84.06 ± 7.84 and 83.56 ± 7.22 at gamma angles 90°, 110° and 70° respectively. Similarly, the gradient indices and beam on time were 2.80 ± 0.23, 2.81 ± 0.23 and 2.80 ± 0.25 and 120.65 ± 59.63, 117.95 ± 58.06 and 123.99 ± 61.61 min, respectively, at 90°, 110° and 70°. The selectivity index, gradient index and beam on time were minimal at gamma angle 110° compared to the other two angles, but not statistically significant (one-way ANOVA p-values were 0.9686, 0.9942 and 0.9598, respectively). The gamma angle of 110° is a good choice for treatment planning of VS patient in Gamma Knife as it gives better treatment plans (minimal cochlea doses).
© 2021 Old City Publishing, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gamma angle; beam on time; gamma knife radiosurgery; gradient index; selectivity index; vestibular schwannoma

Year:  2021        PMID: 34631236      PMCID: PMC8492045     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT


  9 in total

1.  A simple and reliable index for scoring rival stereotactic radiosurgery plans.

Authors:  Thomas H Wagner; Francis J Bova; William A Friedman; John M Buatti; Lionel G Bouchet; Sanford L Meeks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Standardization of terminology in stereotactic radiosurgery: Report from the Standardization Committee of the International Leksell Gamma Knife Society: special topic.

Authors:  Michael Torrens; Caroline Chung; Hyun-Tai Chung; Patrick Hanssens; David Jaffray; Andras Kemeny; David Larson; Marc Levivier; Christer Lindquist; Bodo Lippitz; Josef Novotny; Ian Paddick; Dheerendra Prasad; Chung Ping Yu
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  Comparison of full width at half maximum and penumbra of different Gamma Knife models.

Authors:  Sepideh Asgari; Nooshin Banaee; Hassan Ali Nedaie
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.805

4.  Radiosurgery of vestibular schwannomas: summary of experience in 829 cases.

Authors:  L Dade Lunsford; Ajay Niranjan; John C Flickinger; Ann Maitz; Douglas Kondziolka
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Stereotactic radiosurgery using the 201 cobalt-60 source gamma knife.

Authors:  R J Coffey; L D Lunsford
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Hearing preservation after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas presenting with high-level hearing.

Authors:  Manabu Tamura; Romain Carron; Shoji Yomo; Yasser Arkha; Xavier Muraciolle; Denis Porcheron; Jean M Thomassin; Pierre H Roche; Jean Régis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  A quantitative comparison of radiosurgical treatment parameters in vestibular schwannomas: the Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion versus Model 4C.

Authors:  Shoji Yomo; Manabu Tamura; Romain Carron; Denis Porcheron; Jean Régis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Quantifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment planning.

Authors:  Nicoletta J Lomax; Stefan G Scheib
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A technique to increase the treatment plan indices in GammaKnife: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Ngangom Robert; Manjul Tripathi; Gaurav Trivedi; R P Chauhan; Arun Oinam; Ranjit Singh; Parsee Tomar
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2021
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.