| Literature DB >> 34628943 |
Brandon C Wood1, Joel B Varley1, Kyoung E Kweon1, Patrick Shea1, Alex T Hall2, Andrew Grieder2, Michaele Ward2, Vincent P Aguirre2, Dylan Rigling2, Eduardoe Lopez Ventura2, Chimara Stancill2, Nicole Adelstein2.
Abstract
Superionic solid electrolytes have widespread use in energy devices, but the fundamental motivations for fast ion conduction are often elusive. In this Perspective, we draw upon atomistic simulations of a wide range of superionic conductors to illustrate some ways frustration can lower diffusion cation barriers in solids. Based on our studies of halides, oxides, sulfides and hydroborates and a survey of published reports, we classify three types of frustration that create competition between different local atomic preferences, thereby flattening the diffusive energy landscape. These include chemical frustration, which derives from competing factors in the anion-cation interaction; structural frustration, which arises from lattice arrangements that induce site distortion or prevent cation ordering; and dynamical frustration, which is associated with temporary fluctuations in the energy landscape due to anion reorientation or cation reconfiguration. For each class of frustration, we provide detailed simulation analyses of various materials to show how ion mobility is facilitated, resulting in stabilizing factors that are both entropic and enthalpic in origin. We propose the use of these categories as a general construct for classifying frustration in superionic conductors and discuss implications for future development of suitable descriptors and improvement strategies. This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Understanding fast-ion conduction in solid electrolytes'.Entities:
Keywords: ab initio molecular dynamics; frustration; solid electrolyte; superionic
Year: 2021 PMID: 34628943 PMCID: PMC8529417 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2019.0467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci ISSN: 1364-503X Impact factor: 4.226
Figure 1Frustration and flattened energy landscapes. (a) Whereas the thermodynamics of ordered crystals are conventionally dominated by enthalpy and liquids by entropy, superionic phases have significant contributions from both factors and are stabilized at temperatures below the melting point if the configurational entropy is sufficient. (b) Superionic and melting transition temperatures for silver and copper halides, illustrating the entropic competition between the two as the chemistry is changed. Dashed lines and open symbols are linear extrapolations. (c) Schematic of a diffusive energy landscape for a conventional crystal (dashed black line) versus a crystal with a frustrated energy landscape that is flattened (solid red line). (d) Illustration of the three types of frustration covered in this Perspective: chemical, structural and dynamical. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2Chemical frustration via polarization and covalency. (a) Upper panels: ‘capture’ of a diffusing cation () by a polarizable anion (), accompanied by the temporary introduction of directional covalent character in the anion–cation bond (centre). Lower panels: corresponding density isosurfaces of Maximally Localized Wannier Function centres for iodine in , revealing fluctuations between isotropic distributions for shorter-distance, unpolarized iodine orbitals compared to directional distributions for longer-distance, polarized iodine orbitals with partial covalent character (centre). (b) Asymmetric distributions of anion polarization for several superionic halides sampled from the dynamics trajectories. The corresponding symmetric distribution for LiCl is shown in shaded grey for reference. (c) Distribution of anion polarization for LPS. The left inset shows some of the [PS4]3− coordination environments occurring near jumping Li atoms (orange) in the 200 fs time window centred on the jump. Central P atoms are shown in grey. S atoms are shown in yellow, with the most polarized S atoms within these configurations shown in red, black, green and magenta (purple and green S atoms also share a bridging Li). Corresponding contributions of the most polarized S atoms to the upper tail of the polarization distribution are plotted in the same colour scheme and expanded in the right inset for easier viewing. Portions of panel (a) were adapted with permission from Wood & Marzari [13] (Copyright 2006 American Physical Society). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 3Chemical frustration via anion geometry and electrostatic preferences. Average cation–anion–cation angular distributions () of / around closo-borate anions as a function of cation distance from the anion centre in FCC crystals of (a) non-superionic and superionic (b) , (c) , and (d) at 800 K. The data are plotted within the internal reference frames of the anions. The panels above each subfigure show the angular distributions of FCC interstitial lattice sites, with the key sites occupied in the dynamics indicated with asterisks. The panels below each subfigure indicate the boron triad face centres, with the corresponding anion geometries also shown for reference. The superionic phases exhibit a continuous progression from short-ranged anion templating to longer-ranged lattice interstitial site symmetry. Portions of (b) were adapted with permission from Kweon et al. [21] (Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 4Structural frustration via ordering and site preference. (a) Middle: activation energy at 800 K as a function of volume for compressed and expanded superionic . Top: corresponding projected isosurfaces of average density at standard, compressed and expanded volumes. Bottom: the Shannon entropy associated with occupancy probability spread across linear, trigonal and tetrahedral FCC sites (see equation (3.1)). Whereas the equilibrium superionic volume shows little site preference (centre), altering the volume enhances the preference for ordering on different sites, slowing diffusion. (b) Broad distribution of instantaneous local cation coordination numbers surrounding each anion in select FCC closo-borate superionic conductors (, , ), compared with the narrow distribution for non-superionic , at 800 K. The breadth of the distributions indicates a weak preference for ordering into well-defined coordination environments. (c) Temperature-dependent average relative occupancy of the six unique sets of tetrahedral interstitial sites in the conventional cubic cell of , shown as colours in the inset. Unity occupancy represents the limit of even cation distribution across all tetrahedral sites. The dotted line tracks the average value. Near the experimental transition temperature , the ions transition from a symmetry-broken ordered configuration to a disordered configuration with no clear occupancy preference. Portions of (a) and (b) were adapted with permission from Varley et al. [20] (Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society) and Kweon et al. [21] (Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 5Dynamical frustration via anion rotation. (a) Time-averaged orientations of B–H bonds within anions of in lattice polar coordinates. The upper and lower sets of panels are for temperatures below (500 K) and above (800 K) the order–disorder transition temperature for rapid anion reorientation, respectively. The spatial arrangement of the highest-probability ordered orientations and coordinate scheme are shown at right. The four panels in each set represent the four possible sublattices of ordered anion orientations, which are symmetry-broken and ordered below the transition temperature but symmetry-equivalent and disordered above it. (b) Temperature-dependent Shannon entropy values (see equation (3.1)) associated with the diversity of cation interstitial site occupations (pale yellow) and of anion orientations (dark green) in Li2B12H12, evidencing the coupled order–disorder transition. Corresponding isosurfaces of cation density (transparent yellow) are shown in the schematics below, with the complex anions rendered as spheres for simplicity. (c) Distributions of cation distances from ideal linear and trigonal interstitial site centres below (500 K, top) and above (700 K, middle) the order–disorder transition. The bottom panel is for a 700 K simulation with the anion rotations inhibited, which resembles the low-temperature distribution and features little cation mobility. The insets show schematics of the potential energy wells associated with the two sets of interstitial sites. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 6Dynamical frustration from local fluctuations in cation sublattice mobility. (a) Spatiotemporal distribution of cation jump events in LLZO and LGPS. Jump intervals and distances with high probability (darker colour) represent diffusive hot spots. In each case, the data are normalized against the uncorrelated limit at long time intervals. Jumps in LLZO show strong correlations and hot spots lasting 50–200 fs in duration, whereas LGPS shows highly random jumps with only weak correlations in space and time. (c) Distribution of angles between vectors of discrete jumps in LLZO occurring within 140 fs as a function of distance between the jump sites, showing the high degree of directional correlation. (d) Distribution of diffusion constants for individual diffusing ions in uncorrelated segments of LLZO dynamics, evidencing the breadth of local diffusive timescales. (Online version in colour.)
Examples of frustration in some known solid electrolytes.
| material system | examples | probable drivers |
|---|---|---|
| LPS-type thiophosphates | ||
| LGPS-type thiophosphates | ||
| Argyrodite thiophosphates | ||
| LATP-type phosphates | ||
| Anti-perovskite family | ||
| Hydroborates and | ||
| Ag/Cu halides & chalcogenides | AgI, CuI, | |
| Garnet family | ||