| Literature DB >> 34626841 |
Lars E Larsen1, Marjolein A W van den Boogert2, Wilson A Rios-Ocampo3, Jos C Jansen4, Donna Conlon5, Patrick L E Chong2, J Han M Levels2, Roos E Eilers3, Vinay V Sachdev6, Noam Zelcer6, Tobias Raabe5, Miao He7, Nicholas J Hand8, Joost P H Drenth4, David J Rader9, Eric S G Stroes2, Dirk J Lefeber10, Johan W Jonker3, Adriaan G Holleboom11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Recently, novel inborn errors of metabolism were identified because of mutations in V-ATPase assembly factors TMEM199 and CCDC115. Patients are characterized by generalized protein glycosylation defects, hypercholesterolemia, and fatty liver disease. Here, we set out to characterize the lipid and fatty liver phenotype in human plasma, cell models, and a mouse model. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Fatty liver disease; Hyperlipidemia; Lipid droplet; Lipophagy; Mutations in TMEM199 and in CCDC115; NAFLD; V-ATPase assembly defects
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34626841 PMCID: PMC8688563 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.09.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2352-345X
Figure 1Plasma levels of (A) TC, (B) LDL-c, (C) HDL-c, (D) TG, (E) apoA-I, and (F) apoB in 3 TMEM199- and 3 CCDC115-CDG patients after overnight fast and compared with 12 age- and gender-matched controls. Representative traces of FPLC of (G) 1 TMEM199 patient and (H) 1 CCDC115-CDG patient are shown with the trace of pooled control plasma. All measurements are shown as a scatter plot with mean ± standard deviation, and each data point depicts a single measure from an individual subject plasma sample.
Figure 2ApoB secretion in (A) ApoB secretion in TMEM199-deficient HLCs. Panel shows relative 35S apoB secretion in medium of patient-derived HLCs. (B) TMEM199 and CCDC115 mRNA expression levels (left) and TMEM199 protein levels (right) in siTMEM199 and siCCDC115 treated HepG2 cells, (C) mRNA expression of genes involved in cholesterol metabolism, and (D) mRNA expression of genes involved in de novo lipogenesis. (E) Secretion of apoB into the medium (normalized for total protein) in OA stimulated conditions for siTMEM199 treated cells (left) and siCCDC115 treated cells (right). (F) Western blot panel for MTTP (normalized for GAPDH), pre (p)SREBP2 and mature (m)SREBP2 (normalized for B-actin). All panels show representative Western blots or means ± standard deviation from 3 experiments with triplicate measurements per experiment. ∗∗∗∗P < .0001, ∗∗∗P < .001, ∗P < .05, and ns indicates non-significant results as calculated with Student unpaired two-sided t tests.
Figure 3TMEM199 Ala7Glu mouse model on chow diet. Liver and plasma of 8-week-old mice were collected in liquid nitrogen or heparin coated tubes, respectively, after 4-hour fast. (A) QPCR and Western blot for hepatic TMEM199 mRNA (left) and protein expression (right). (B) Body weight and liver weight to body weight ratio; liver to body weight ratio was significantly increased. (C) Biochemical plasma lipid panel; reduced HDL and increased plasma TG were observed. (D) TMEM199-Ala7Glu mice have increased hepatic TG (left) and visible hepatic steatosis (right). (E and F) mRNA expression for genes involved in lipid metabolism in mouse livers. (G) Plasma of control and heterozygous Tmem199-Ala7Glu mice were pooled for FPLC analysis (n = 5 per group; littermates), and fractions were analyzed for TG and cholesterol content. (H) ApoB100/48, PCSK9, and apoA1 were analyzed from 7 μL whole plasma on Western blot. (I and J) MTTP and SREBP2, respectively, on Western blots of mouse liver lysates. All panels show representative Western blots from 3 experiments with triplicate measurements per experiment. ∗∗∗P < .001, ∗∗P < .01, ∗P < .05 as calculated with unpaired Mann-Whitney test. (K) N-glycan MALDI-TOF profiles derived from mouse plasma.
Quantified N-Glycan MALDI-TOF Profiles Derived From Mouse Plasma
| Wild-type | 42% | 19% | 15% | 4% | 0% |
| TMEM199 Ala7Glu | 45% | 19% | 10% | 2% | 1% |
Figure 4Lipid droplet accumulation and autophagy analysis of HepG2 cells were treated with siRNAs for non-targeted (control), TMEM199, and CCDC115. (A) After 24 hours of siRNA treatment cells were incubated with 200 μmol BSA conjugated OA in full medium for 24 hours. After incubation with OA cellular neutral lipids and lysosomes were labeled with LipidTox and Lysotracker red DND-99, respectively. (B) Quantification of lipid droplet size, number of lipids per nucleus, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient for LipidTox Green and Lysotracker Red DND-99. (C) Oroboros respiratory capacity in siTMEM199 HepG2 cells compared with controls. (D) HepG2 cells were treated 48 hours with siRNA; Bafilomycin A1 is positive control for V-ATPase mediated induced autophagy inhibition. Panels represent whole cell lysate protein levels of autophagy markers (P62; LC3B) and GAPDH as loading control. (E) Mouse liver lysates analyzed for autophagy marker (p62/LC3). (F) siRNA treated HepG2 cells were analyzed for lysosomal acidification by LysoSensor DND-160; shown are the pH measurements of the acidification capacity of treated cells and pH calibration curve. Bafilomycin A1 and chloroquine were used as positive de-acidification agents. All panels show representative Western blots from 3 experiments with triplicate measurements per experiment.
Primer Sequences Used for QPCR
| Mouse cholesterol metabolism qPCR primers | |||
| Forward | ACCTAGACCTCGCCAAAGGT | ||
| Reverse | GCACGGATAAGCAGGTTTGT | ||
| Forward | CTGGACGACGATGCCCAGGC | ||
| Reverse | GTCACTGTGAGGCTTTTCCG | ||
| Forward | GCCGTGAACTGGGTCGAA | ||
| Reverse | TCTGTTGTGAACCATGTGACTTC | ||
| Forward | TGGTGGGACCAACCTTCTAC | ||
| Reverse | GCCATCACACGTGCCACATAC | ||
| Forward | GATGTGGACGTTGTGTTACTGTGGAGGAATC | ||
| Reverse | GAAGATGCTCTTCTCGCCTCTCTGTTGAC | ||
| Forward | CCCTGACAAGGATGAACCTAAATATATCCTG | ||
| Reverse | TCTTGAATTCACGGTAACCTGAGTTGAGC | ||
| Forward | GATGGCTATACCTACCCCTCAA | ||
| Reverse | TGCTCATGCCACATCGTC | ||
| Forward | GAAGACCGCTCCCCTGAT | ||
| Reverse | GCACCCTGGATGCTGGTA | ||
| Mouse de novo lipogenesis qPCR primers | |||
| Reverse | CATCCTCTTCTCCCAGCA AG | ||
| Forward | CATTACCAAGGCACTGTCCA | ||
| Forward | GCAGACTCACTGCTGCTGAC | ||
| Reverse | AGGTACTGTGGCCAAGATGG | ||
| Forward | GCTGCTGTTGGAAGTCAGC | ||
| Reverse | AGTGTTCGTTCCTCGGAGTG | ||
| Forward | GGCCTGGCTGGAACAGTA | ||
| Reverse | CGAAGGGAATTCAGGACAGT | ||
| Forward | ACTGGAGATCTCTTGGAGCA | ||
| Reverse | CAGGTTTCCAAGCGCAGTTC | ||
| Forward | GATCGGAACTGTGGGCTCAT | ||
| Reverse | GATCGGAACTGTGGGCTCAT | ||
| Forward | GGTTTGGAGATGGTTATACAATAGTTGT | ||
| Reverse | GGTTTGGAGATGGTTATACAATAGTTGT | ||
| Human housekeeping qPCR primers | |||
| Reverse | ACGGGTACAAACGAGTCCTG | ||
| Forward | GCCTTGACCTTTTCAGCAAG | ||
| Forward | GAGGGAGCCTGAGAAACGG | ||
| Reverse | GTCGGGAGTGGGTAATTTGC | ||
| Mouse housekeeping qPCR primers | |||
| Reverse | CCGGATGTGAGGCAGCAG | ||
| Forward | GCTCCAAGCAGATGCAGCA | ||
| Forward | CAC TTT TGG GGC CTT CGT G | ||
| Reverse | GCA AAG GCC CAG AGA CTC ATT | ||