Melissa Goldin Evans1, Julia Fleckman2, Tylar T Williams3,4, Stephanie M Tokarz2, Katherine P Theall2. 1. The Department of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, Mary Amelia Center for Women's Health Equity Research, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 143 S. Liberty St, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. mgoldinevans@tulane.edu. 2. The Department of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, Mary Amelia Center for Women's Health Equity Research, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 143 S. Liberty St, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. 3. The Department of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, Mary Amelia Center for Women's Health Equity Research, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 143 S. Liberty St, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA. tylar.williams12@gmail.com. 4. Institute of Women & Ethnic Studies, New Orleans, LA, USA. tylar.williams12@gmail.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Short message service (SMS), or text-based, health interventions offer a promising opportunity to deliver health education and have been shown to improve diet and exercise. However, few are theory-based or target low-income parents. This pilot study, informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), primarily sought to determine if health education delivered via SMS was feasible and acceptable to low-income parents of young children. METHODS: Using a one-group, pre- to post-test study design to assess a 12-week SMS-based health education program, parents enrolled in a health-related program at an early childhood development center for low-income families were sent three text messages per week that corresponded to a weekly diet or physical activity-related theme. Surveys assessed pre-post changes in TPB constructs and collected program feedback. RESULTS: Among the 119 eligible parents invited to participate, 109 were sent all text messages for the duration of the study. Participants were mostly Black (98.9%), 25-39 years old (83.9%), female (93.8%), and in single-parent households (63.8%). More than half (n = 59) completed the pre-survey, answered a bi-directional program text, or completed the post-survey. Twelve participants completed both the pre- and post-survey and at least one bi-directional text. Post-survey results revealed that most participants liked the program design and enjoyed their experience with the program. CONCLUSIONS: SMS-based interventions can simplify delivery of health information to low-income parents of young children. Although engagement was low, retention was high, and feedback was largely positive.
INTRODUCTION: Short message service (SMS), or text-based, health interventions offer a promising opportunity to deliver health education and have been shown to improve diet and exercise. However, few are theory-based or target low-income parents. This pilot study, informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), primarily sought to determine if health education delivered via SMS was feasible and acceptable to low-income parents of young children. METHODS: Using a one-group, pre- to post-test study design to assess a 12-week SMS-based health education program, parents enrolled in a health-related program at an early childhood development center for low-income families were sent three text messages per week that corresponded to a weekly diet or physical activity-related theme. Surveys assessed pre-post changes in TPB constructs and collected program feedback. RESULTS: Among the 119 eligible parents invited to participate, 109 were sent all text messages for the duration of the study. Participants were mostly Black (98.9%), 25-39 years old (83.9%), female (93.8%), and in single-parent households (63.8%). More than half (n = 59) completed the pre-survey, answered a bi-directional program text, or completed the post-survey. Twelve participants completed both the pre- and post-survey and at least one bi-directional text. Post-survey results revealed that most participants liked the program design and enjoyed their experience with the program. CONCLUSIONS: SMS-based interventions can simplify delivery of health information to low-income parents of young children. Although engagement was low, retention was high, and feedback was largely positive.
Authors: M S McDermott; M Oliver; T Simnadis; E J Beck; T Coltman; D Iverson; P Caputi; R Sharma Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-09-05 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Sheana Bull; Sharon Devine; Sarah J Schmiege; Leslie Pickard; Jon Campbell; Judith C Shlay Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Pamela McCoy; Sophia Leggett; Azad Bhuiyan; David Brown; Patricia Frye; Bryman Williams Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 3.390