Literature DB >> 34625452

Single and Multilevel Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Adjacent to L5-S1 ALIF (Lumbar Hybrid): 6 Years of Follow-up.

Jason M Cuellar1, Alexandre Rasouli1, Todd H Lanman2, Lea Kanim1, Rick Delamarter1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single and multilevel lumbar arthroplasty has had excellent results, but the L5-S1 level frequently has pathology that precludes arthroplasty. This study evaluated clinical outcomes and sagittal range of motion (ROM) of operated levels and adjacent motion segments in single- and multiple-level ProDisc-L above a simultaneous L5-S1 fusion (hybrid) after a 2- to 6-year follow-up.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 46 patients underwent simultaneous lumbar total disc replacement (TDR) at one to three levels and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5-S1. Twenty-three patients had L5-S1 ALIF + L4-5 TDR, 19 patients had L5-S1 ALIF + two-level TDR, and 4 patients had L5-S1 ALIF + three-level TDR. Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scores (VAS) of patient satisfaction (VAS-S) and pain (VAS-P) were recorded. Sagittal motion on pre- and postoperative lumbar radiographs at each operative segment and adjacent segment was acquired. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and annually for 24 to 72 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: For clinical results, there were no differences among the groups for age, gender, body mass index, tobacco use, or worker's compensation status. At 2-6 years postoperation, all patients had significant reductions in ODI and VAS scores. For radiographic results, at the nonsurgical level adjacent to the TDR + ALIF constructs, the mean preoperative ROM was 9.40 ± 1.80° compared with 10.50 ± 2.25° postoperatively. The mean preoperative ROM at levels undergoing TDR was 10.4 ± 2.71° versus 12.6 ± 2.25° postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in ROM at each prosthetic motion segment between patients receiving one-, two-, or three-level TDR. The mean preoperative ROM at the L5-S1 segment to undergo fusion was 2.4 ± 2.44°, with all patients having a postoperative ROM of 0.00°.
CONCLUSIONS: Multilevel TDR above an L5-S1 ALIF (hybrid procedure) preserves ROM at the individual TDR levels and does not reduce the fusion rate of the L5-S1 fused level. Most significantly, the nonoperative adjacent level maintains its preoperative ROM at 2-6 years postoperatively. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2021 ISASS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  low back pain; lumbar; lumbar disc arthroplasty; lumbar hybrid; multilevel lumbar disc replacement; spine; total disc replacement

Year:  2021        PMID: 34625452      PMCID: PMC8651200          DOI: 10.14444/8127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  20 in total

Review 1.  Hybrid constructs.

Authors:  Rudolf Bertagnoli; Patrick Tropiano; Jack Zigler; Armin Karg; Sandra Voigt
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.

Authors:  Anton E Dmitriev; Norman W Gill; Timothy R Kuklo; Michael K Rosner
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Five-year adjacent-level degenerative changes in patients with single-level disease treated using lumbar total disc replacement with ProDisc-L versus circumferential fusion.

Authors:  Jack E Zigler; Jamieson Glenn; Rick B Delamarter
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-10-19

4.  Multiple-Level Lumbar Total Disk Replacement: A Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of Motion Preservation at 24-72 Months.

Authors:  Alexandre Rasouli; Jason M Cuellar; Lea Kanim; Rick Delamarter
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Survivorship and clinical outcomes after multi-level anterior lumbar reconstruction with stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion or hybrid construct.

Authors:  Benjamin Chen; Yusuf T Akpolat; Paul Williams; Darren Bergey; Wayne K Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 1.961

6.  Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rick Delamarter; Jeffrey M Spivak; Raymond J Linovitz; Guy O Danielson; Thomas T Haider; Frank Cammisa; Jim Zuchermann; Richard Balderston; Scott Kitchel; Kevin Foley; Robert Watkins; David Bradford; James Yue; Hansen Yuan; Harry Herkowitz; Doug Geiger; John Bendo; Timothy Peppers; Barton Sachs; Federico Girardi; Michael Kropf; Jeff Goldstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  James S Harrop; Jim A Youssef; Mitch Maltenfort; Peggy Vorwald; Pascal Jabbour; Christopher M Bono; Neil Goldfarb; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alan S Hilibrand
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of disc degeneration 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  M Penta; A Sandhu; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion?

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Matthew Robbins
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Progression of Adjacent-level Degeneration After Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Results of a Post-hoc Analysis of Patients With Available Radiographs From a Prospective Study With 5-year Follow-up.

Authors:  Jack E Zigler; Scott L Blumenthal; Richard D Guyer; Donna D Ohnmeiss; Leena Patel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.