Literature DB >> 34625409

Novel Models of Genetic Education and Testing for Pancreatic Cancer Interception: Preliminary Results from the GENERATE Study.

C Sloane Furniss1,2, Matthew B Yurgelun1,2,3, Chinedu Ukaegbu1, Pamela E Constantinou4, Catherine C Lafferty1, Eliana R Talcove-Berko1, Alison N Schwartz1, Jill E Stopfer1, Meghan Underhill-Blazey1, Barbara Kenner5, Scott H Nelson6, Sydney Okumura7, Sherman Law7, Alicia Y Zhou7, Tara B Coffin8, Nicolette J Rodriguez1,2,3, Hajime Uno1,2, Allyson J Ocean9, Florencia McAllister4, Andrew M Lowy10, Scott M Lippman10, Alison P Klein11, Lisa Madlensky10, Gloria M Petersen12, Judy E Garber1,2,3, Michael G Goggins11, Anirban Maitra4, Sapna Syngal13,2,3.   

Abstract

Up to 10% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carry underlying germline pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes. The GENetic Education Risk Assessment and TEsting (GENERATE) study aimed to evaluate novel methods of genetic education and testing in relatives of patients with PDAC. Eligible individuals had a family history of PDAC and a relative with a germline pathogenic variant in APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, or TP53 genes. Participants were recruited at six academic cancer centers and through social media campaigns and patient advocacy efforts. Enrollment occurred via the study website (https://GENERATEstudy.org) and all participation, including collecting a saliva sample for genetic testing, could be done from home. Participants were randomized to one of two remote methods that delivered genetic education about the risks of inherited PDAC and strategies for surveillance. The primary outcome of the study was uptake of genetic testing. From 5/8/2019 to 5/6/2020, 49 participants were randomized to each of the intervention arms. Overall, 90 of 98 (92%) of randomized participants completed genetic testing. The most frequently detected pathogenic variants included those in BRCA2 (N = 15, 17%), ATM (N = 11, 12%), and CDKN2A (N = 4, 4%). Participation in the study remained steady throughout the onset of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Preliminary data from the GENERATE study indicate success of remote alternatives to traditional cascade testing, with genetic testing rates over 90% and a high rate of identification of germline pathogenic variant carriers who would be ideal candidates for PDAC interception approaches. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Preliminary data from the GENERATE study indicate success of remote alternatives for pancreatic cancer genetic testing and education, with genetic testing uptake rates over 90% and a high rate of identification of germline pathogenic variant carriers who would be ideal candidates for pancreatic cancer interception. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34625409      PMCID: PMC8563400          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  41 in total

1.  Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer-Related Patient Encounters.

Authors:  Jack W London; Elnara Fazio-Eynullayeva; Matvey B Palchuk; Peter Sankey; Christopher McNair
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-07

2.  Multi-Gene Panel Testing of 23,179 Individuals for Hereditary Cancer Risk Identifies Pathogenic Variant Carriers Missed by Current Genetic Testing Guidelines.

Authors:  Cynthia L Neben; Anjali D Zimmer; Will Stedden; Jeroen van den Akker; Robert O'Connor; Raymond C Chan; Elaine Chen; Zheng Tan; Annette Leon; Jack Ji; Scott Topper; Alicia Y Zhou
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Prospective Feasibility Trial of a Novel Strategy of Facilitated Cascade Genetic Testing Using Telephone Counseling.

Authors:  Melissa K Frey; Ryan M Kahn; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Francesca Tubito; Maira Pires; Paul Christos; Samantha Anderson; Semanti Mukherjee; Bailey Jordan; Stephanie V Blank; Thomas A Caputo; Ravi N Sharaf; Kenneth Offit; Kevin Holcomb; Steven Lipkin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Family communication and patient distress after germline genetic testing in individuals with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mary Linton B Peters; Lindsey Stobie; Beth Dudley; Eve Karloski; Kyle Allen; Virginia Speare; Jill S Dolinsky; Yuan Tian; Kim DeLeonardis; Jill Krejdovsky; Arlene Button; Cynthia Lim; Erkut Borazanci; Randall Brand; Nadine Tung
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: State-of-the-art 2017 and new therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Marta Chiaravalli; Michele Reni; Eileen M O'Reilly
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  To tell or not to tell: barriers and facilitators in family communication about genetic risk.

Authors:  K Forrest; S A Simpson; B J Wilson; E R van Teijlingen; L McKee; N Haites; E Matthews
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Benefit of Surveillance for Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk Individuals: Outcome of Long-Term Prospective Follow-Up Studies From Three European Expert Centers.

Authors:  Hans Vasen; Isaura Ibrahim; Carmen Guillen Ponce; Emily P Slater; Elvira Matthäi; Alfredo Carrato; Julie Earl; Kristin Robbers; Anneke M van Mil; Thomas Potjer; Bert A Bonsing; Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; Wilma Bergman; Martin Wasser; Hans Morreau; Günter Klöppel; Christoph Schicker; Martin Steinkamp; Jens Figiel; Irene Esposito; Evelina Mocci; Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros; Alfonso Sanjuanbenito; Maria Muñoz-Beltran; José Montans; Peter Langer; Volker Fendrich; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Surveillance for pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals.

Authors:  I C A W Konings; M I Canto; J A Almario; F Harinck; P Saxena; A L Lucas; F Kastrinos; D C Whitcomb; R E Brand; J Lachter; G Malleo; S Paiella; S Syngal; J R Saltzman; E M Stoffel; J E van Hooft; R H Hruban; J W Poley; P Fockens; M G Goggins; M J Bruno
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-07-02

9.  Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium.

Authors:  Michael Goggins; Kasper Alexander Overbeek; Randall Brand; Sapna Syngal; Marco Del Chiaro; Detlef K Bartsch; Claudio Bassi; Alfredo Carrato; James Farrell; Elliot K Fishman; Paul Fockens; Thomas M Gress; Jeanin E van Hooft; R H Hruban; Fay Kastrinos; Allison Klein; Anne Marie Lennon; Aimee Lucas; Walter Park; Anil Rustgi; Diane Simeone; Elena Stoffel; Hans F A Vasen; Djuna L Cahen; Marcia Irene Canto; Marco Bruno
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Prevalence of germ-line mutations in cancer genes among pancreatic cancer patients with a positive family history.

Authors:  Kari G Chaffee; Ann L Oberg; Robert R McWilliams; Neil Majithia; Brian A Allen; John Kidd; Nanda Singh; Anne-Renee Hartman; Richard J Wenstrup; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Ageing and cancer: a research gap to fill.

Authors:  Eric Solary; Nancy Abou-Zeid; Fabien Calvo
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 7.449

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.