Literature DB >> 3462410

Breast cancer among women given X-ray therapy for acute postpartum mastitis.

R E Shore, N Hildreth, E Woodard, P Dvoretsky, L Hempelmann, B Pasternack.   

Abstract

Acute postpartum mastitis (APM) is an inflammatory-infectious condition of the breast, occurring commonly at childbirth or during lactation. A series of 601 women who received x-ray therapy for APM during the 1940's or 1950's have been followed up by mail questionnaire, with medical verification of pertinent conditions, to ascertain their incidences of breast cancer. Control subjects consisted of a series with APM who did not receive irradiation, plus the female siblings of both the APM groups, for a total of 1,239 controls. The groups have been followed up to 45 years; the average was 29 years. The relative risk (RR) for breast cancer, adjusted for age and interval since irradiation (or an equivalent entry definition for controls), was 3.2 for the irradiated breasts; the 90% confidence interval (CI) was 2.3-4.3. For a linear multiplicative model, the risk increased by 0.4% per rad (90% Cl of 0.2-0.7). The dose-response curve appeared to be essentially linear, except for a diminution of risk at high doses (greater than or equal to 700 rad). The fact that there were no treated breasts with doses between 0 and 60 rad, however, means that it was not possible to evaluate the curvature with the maximum contrast between low and high doses. The dose fractionation analyses showed that neither the number of dose fractions, the number of days between fractions, nor the dose per fraction had any apparent effect on breast cancer risk when the variables were analyzed separately. Similarly, when the fractionation variables were considered jointly in a Cox regression analysis, none was significant once total breast dose was controlled for. Analyses of age at irradiation did not show appreciable differences between age groups, although the numbers were too small to be clear-cut (only 64 women greater than 34 yr old at irradiation). Other studies have shown diminished risk associated with an older age at irradiation. The lack of diminished risk in this study may occur because during pregnancy and lactation the breasts are under increased proliferative stimulation by hormones, by comparison with the normal condition of breasts at older ages. An analysis of the temporal relationship of radiation to breast cancer showed that the RR did not vary systematically with interval since irradiation, but the absolute risk increased over time. This finding agrees with other studies that have also suggested a better fit for the multiplicative model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3462410     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/77.3.689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  26 in total

1.  A stochastic markov model of cellular response to radiation.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wojciech Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński; Marek Krzysztof Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 2.  Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging: how good are the data?

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  [Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks].

Authors:  E A Nekolla; J Griebel; G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Epidemiological designs in radioepidemiological research.

Authors:  E Cardis; J Estève
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1991

5.  Projecting radiation-induced cancer risks across time and populations.

Authors:  C R Muirhead
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1991

6.  Insights from radiation treatment for benign disease.

Authors:  N M Bleehen
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-08-29

Review 7.  Radiotherapy for benign disease; assessing the risk of radiation-induced cancer following exposure to intermediate dose radiation.

Authors:  Stephanie R McKeown; Paul Hatfield; Robin J D Prestwich; Richard E Shaffer; Roger E Taylor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  New biological insights on the link between radiation exposure and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Murine microenvironment metaprofiles associate with human cancer etiology and intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  David H Nguyen; Erik Fredlund; Wei Zhao; Charles M Perou; Allan Balmain; Jian-Hua Mao; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Relation of risk of contralateral breast cancer to the interval since the first primary tumour.

Authors:  C Rubino; R Arriagada; S Delaloge; M G Lê
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.