| Literature DB >> 34623750 |
Masahiro Arakawa1, Toru Kitahara2, Daisuke Inadomi3, Masahiro Iikubo4, Hiroto Hyakutake5, Kenji Yuasa6, Ichiro Takahashi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Skeletal mandibular protrusion would influence to the muscle fatigue of the masticatory muscles. Establishing a diagnostic procedures combining physiological and biochemical information is necessary for quantitative evaluation of masticatory muscle fatigue.Entities:
Keywords: functional MRI; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; masseter muscle; molecular imaging; muscle fatigue; prognathism
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34623750 PMCID: PMC8874048 DOI: 10.1002/cre2.494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Dent Res ISSN: 2057-4347
Figure 1(a, c) Representative axial plane T2‐weighted MR images obtained at the midbelly of the masseter muscle at rest (a) and after clenching (c). Measurement of the T2 value and cross‐sectional area of the masseter muscle. The region of interest (ROI) on a defined axial slice (green line) was measured. (b, d) the position of the ROI on 31P‐MRS for the masseter muscle was set so as to obtain as large a pixel size as possible (red line)
Characteristics of the participants
| Healthy controls | Patients | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Age (years) | 27.8 | 4.4 | 29.4 | 9.2 |
| Gender (number of subject) | ||||
| Female | 6 | 12 | ||
| Male | 13 | 7 | ||
| ANB angle (°) | ― | ― | −2.2 | 3.2 |
| Wits appraisal (mm) | ― | ― | −11.2 | 5.8 |
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Figure 2Representative axial T2‐weighted magnetic resonance images (a–c) and T2 mapping images (d–f)
T2 signal profile (m/s) and PCr, Pi signal intensity, and pH in the masseter muscle
| Rest | Clenching | Recovery | Multiple comparisons | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | |||||
| T2 | ||||||||||
| Healthy controls | 36.58 | ± | 0.66 | 40.31 | ± | 0.82 | 37.14 | ± | 0.65 | (Rest/clenching, clenching/recovery) |
| Patients | 38.72 | ± | 0.37 | 41.39 | ± | 0.36 | 38.41 | ± | 0.40 | (Rest/clenching, clenching/recovery) |
| PCr | ||||||||||
| Healthy controls | 1.43 | ± | 0.14 | 0.60 | ± | 0.08 | 1.23 | ± | 0.11 | (Rest/clenching, clenching/recovery) |
| Patients | 1.23 | ± | 0.13 | 0.54 | ± | 0.07 | 1.06 | ± | 0.10 | (Rest/clenching, clenching/recovery) |
| Pi | ||||||||||
| Healthy controls | 0.16 | ± | 0.02 | 0.68 | ± | 0.08 | 0.20 | ± | 0.02 | (Rest/clenching, clenching/recovery) |
| Patients | 0.19 | ± | 0.04 | 0.78 | ± | 0.15 | 0.22 | ± | 0.03 | (Rest/clenching, clenching/recovery) |
| pH | ||||||||||
| Healthy controls | 7.09 | ± | 0.01 | 6.95 | ± | 0.01 | 7.05 | ± | 0.01 | (Rest/clenching, clenching/recovery) |
| Patients | 7.02 | ± | 0.02 | 6.93 | ± | 0.02 | 7.00 | ± | 0.02 | (Rest/clenching, clenching/recovery) |
Abbreviation: SE, standard error.
p < 0.05.
Figure 3The average T2 value of the patient group and that of the healthy group Scheffe's F‐test with the level of significance set at p < 0.05
Figure 4The pH of the patient group and healthy control group in the masseter muscle (p < 0.05)