| Literature DB >> 34623327 |
Anthony T Tan1, Joey Me Lim1, Nina Le Bert1, Kamini Kunasegaran1, Adeline Chia1, Martin Dc Qui1, Nicole Tan1, Wan Ni Chia1, Ruklanthi de Alwis1,2, Ding Ying3,4,5, Jean Xy Sim6, Eng Eong Ooi1, Lin-Fa Wang1, Mark I-Cheng Chen3, Barnaby E Young3,4,5, Li Yang Hsu7, Jenny Gh Low1,6, David C Lye3,4,5,8, Antonio Bertoletti1,9.
Abstract
Defining the correlates of protection necessary to manage the COVID-19 pandemic requires the analysis of both antibody and T cell parameters, but the complexity of traditional tests limits virus-specific T cell measurements. We tested the sensitivity and performance of a simple and rapid SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific T cell test based on the stimulation of whole blood with peptides covering the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, followed by cytokine (IFN-γ, IL-2) measurement in different cohorts including BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals (n = 112), convalescent asymptomatic and symptomatic COVID-19 patients (n = 130), and SARS-CoV-1-convalescent individuals (n = 12). The sensitivity of this rapid test is comparable to that of traditional methods of T cell analysis (ELISPOT, activation-induced marker). Using this test, we observed a similar mean magnitude of T cell responses between the vaccinees and SARS-CoV-2 convalescents 3 months after vaccination or virus priming. However, a wide heterogeneity of the magnitude of spike-specific T cell responses characterized the individual responses, irrespective of the time of analysis. The magnitude of these spike-specific T cell responses cannot be predicted from the neutralizing antibody levels. Hence, both humoral and cellular spike-specific immunity should be tested after vaccination to define the correlates of protection necessary to evaluate current vaccine strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptive immunity; COVID-19; Cytokines; Immunology; T cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34623327 PMCID: PMC8409582 DOI: 10.1172/JCI152379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Invest ISSN: 0021-9738 Impact factor: 14.808