| Literature DB >> 34622312 |
Abstract
With the advent of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, a wide range of life-threatening maxillofacial fungal coinfections have also been observed in patients. We conducted this systematic review to collate and evaluate the data to enable clinicians to understand the disease pattern and types of mycosis and provide meticulous management of these infections in COVID-19 patients. The review was carried out in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines. A systematic electronic literature search was conducted on major databases using keywords in combination with Boolean Operators. Manuscripts discussing cases of maxillofacial fungal infections in COVID-19 patients were included. A total of 11 studies were systematically reviewed to assess the fungal coinfections in COVID-19 patients. Twenty-one cases of mucormycosis, 58 of candidiasis, and 1 each of aspergillosis and mixed infection were observed in the region of head and neck. Significant increase in invasive fungal infection is evident in patients suffering from COVID-19 which could be due to immunosuppression and other pre-existing comorbidities. Early diagnosis and intervention like systemic antifungals or surgical debridement is mandatory to reduce morbidity and mortality.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Fungal infections; Maxillofacial region
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34622312 PMCID: PMC8497068 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-021-01010-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oral Maxillofac Surg ISSN: 1865-1550
Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review
| S. No | Author and year | No. of patients | Mean age (years) | Gender | Site | Fungal infection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bhagali R et al. [ India | 1 | 42 | Male | Retina | Candidiasis |
| 2 | Dallalzadeh LO et al. [ (March 2021) | 2 | - | - | Rhino-orbital cerebral | Mucormycosis |
| 3 | Moorthy A et al. [ | 16 | 35–73 | 2 Females and 14 males | Orbital and maxillary | Mucormycosis |
| 1 | 52 | Female | Aspergillosis | |||
| 1 | 45 | Male | Mixed fungal infection | |||
| 4 | Zesemayat K Mekonnen et al. [ | 1 | - | - | Rhino-orbital | Mucormycosis |
| 5 | Amanda Werthman Ehrenreich et al. [ Buffalo, USA | 1 | 33 | Female | Rhino-orbital-cerebral | Mucormycosis |
| 6 | Salil Mehta and Abha Pandey [ (Sept 2020) India | 1 | 60 | Male | Rhino-orbital | Mucormycosis |
| 7 | Abanoub RIAD et al. [ Czech Republic | 1 | 47 | Female | Oral cavity — dorsal surface of tongue and palate | Candidiasis |
| 8 | Amorim Dos Santos et al. [ (August 2020) Brazil | 1 | 67 | Male | Oral | Candidiasis |
| 9 | Jairo Corchculo and Francis Chavier Ulloa [ (Aug 2020) Columbia | 1 | 40 | Female | Oral cavity — attached gingiva of lower 1st premolar and lateral border of tongue | Candidiasis |
| 10 | Milagros Dias Rodriguez et al. [ (Aug 2020) Spain | 1 | 78 | Female | Oral cavity — tongue, palate, commissures | Pseudo membrane Candidiasis |
| 11 | Mohammadreza Salehi et al. [ (July 2020) Iran | 53 | 27–90 | 23 males 30 females | Oropharyngeal areas | Candidiasis |
Fig. 1Flow diagram of study selection process
Risk of bias assessment
| S. No | Methodological items | Moorthy A et al. [ | Mohammadreza Salehi et al. [ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A clearly stated aim | Yes | Yes |
| 2 | Inclusion of consecutive patients | Yes | Yes |
| 3 | Prospective collection of data | No | Yes |
| 4 | End points appropriate to aim of study | Yes | Yes |
| 5 | Unbiased assessment of study endpoint | Yes | Yes |
| 6 | Follow up period appropriate to aim of study | Yes | Yes |
| 7 | Loss to follow up less than 5% | Yes | Yes |
| 8 | Prospective calculation of study size | No | No |
| 9 | An adequate control group | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| 10 | Contemporary groups | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| 11 | Baseline equivalence of groups | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| 12 | Adequate statistical analysis | Yes | Yes |