Literature DB >> 34617981

Performance of the McGill Interactive Pediatric OncoGenetic Guidelines for Identifying Cancer Predisposition Syndromes.

Catherine Goudie1,2, Leora Witkowski3, Noelle Cullinan4,5, Lara Reichman2,3, Ian Schiller6, Melissa Tachdjian2, Linlea Armstrong7, Katherine A Blood7,8, Josée Brossard9, Ledia Brunga10, Chantel Cacciotti11, Kimberly Caswell10, Sonia Cellot12, Mary Egan Clark13, Catherine Clinton14, Hallie Coltin5, Kathleen Felton15, Conrad V Fernandez16, Adam J Fleming17, Noemi Fuentes-Bolanos18,19, Paul Gibson17, Ronald Grant5, Rawan Hammad5,20, Lynn W Harrison13, Meredith S Irwin5, Donna L Johnston21, Sarah Kane22, Lucie Lafay-Cousin23, Irene Lara-Corrales24, Valerie Larouche25, Natalie Mathews5, M Stephen Meyn26,27, Orli Michaeli5, Renée Perrier28, Meghan Pike16, Angela Punnett5, Vijay Ramaswamy5, Jemma Say29, Gino Somers30, Uri Tabori5, My Linh Thibodeau5,10, Annie-Kim Toupin31,32, Katherine M Tucker33, Kalene van Engelen34, Stephanie Vairy9,12, Nicolas Waespe35,36, Meera Warby33, Jonathan D Wasserman37,38, James A Whitlock5, Daniel Sinnett12, Nada Jabado1,2, Paul C Nathan5, Adam Shlien10,38, Junne Kamihara14, Rebecca J Deyell39, David S Ziegler18,19, Kim E Nichols13, Nandini Dendukuri6, David Malkin5, Anita Villani5, William D Foulkes40,41,42.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Prompt recognition of a child with a cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS) has implications for cancer management, surveillance, genetic counseling, and cascade testing of relatives. Diagnosis of CPS requires practitioner expertise, access to genetic testing, and test result interpretation. This diagnostic process is not accessible in all institutions worldwide, leading to missed CPS diagnoses. Advances in electronic health technology can facilitate CPS risk assessment.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a CPS prediction tool (McGill Interactive Pediatric OncoGenetic Guidelines [MIPOGG]) in identifying children with cancer who have a low or high likelihood of having a CPS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this international, multicenter diagnostic accuracy study, 1071 pediatric (<19 years of age) oncology patients who had a confirmed CPS (12 oncology referral centers) or who underwent germline DNA sequencing through precision medicine programs (6 centers) from January 1, 2000, to July 31, 2020, were studied. EXPOSURES: Exposures were MIPOGG application in patients with cancer and a confirmed CPS (diagnosed through routine clinical care; n = 413) in phase 1 and MIPOGG application in patients with cancer who underwent germline DNA sequencing (n = 658) in phase 2. Study phases did not overlap. Data analysts were blinded to genetic test results. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The performance of MIPOGG in CPS recognition was compared with that of routine clinical care, including identifying a CPS earlier than practitioners. The tool's test characteristics were calculated using next-generation germline DNA sequencing as the comparator.
RESULTS: In phase 1, a total of 413 patients with cancer (median age, 3.0 years; range, 0-18 years) and a confirmed CPS were identified. MIPOGG correctly recognized 410 of 412 patients (99.5%) as requiring referral for CPS evaluation at the time of primary cancer diagnosis. Nine patients diagnosed with a CPS by a practitioner after their second malignant tumor were detected by MIPOGG using information available at the time of the first cancer. In phase 2, of 658 children with cancer (median age, 6.6 years; range, 0-18.8 years) who underwent comprehensive germline DNA sequencing, 636 had sufficient information for MIPOGG application. When compared with germline DNA sequencing for CPS detection, the MIPOGG test characteristics for pediatric-onset CPSs were as follows: sensitivity, 90.7%; specificity, 60.5%; positive predictive value, 17.6%; and negative predictive value, 98.6%. Tumor DNA sequencing data confirmed the MIPOGG recommendation for CPS evaluation in 20 of 22 patients with established cancer-CPS associations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this diagnostic study, MIPOGG exhibited a favorable accuracy profile for CPS screening and reduced time to CPS recognition. These findings suggest that MIPOGG implementation could standardize and rationalize recommendations for CPS evaluation in children with cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34617981      PMCID: PMC8498936          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.4536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   33.006


  21 in total

1.  Tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria update: recommendations of the 2012 Iinternational Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Hope Northrup; Darcy A Krueger
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.372

2.  Neurofibromatosis. Conference statement. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1988-05

3.  Predictors of the risk of mortality in neurofibromatosis 2.

Authors:  Michael E Baser; J M Friedman; Dana Aeschliman; Harry Joe; Andrew J Wallace; Richard T Ramsden; D Gareth R Evans
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Complications of the naevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome: results of a population based study.

Authors:  D G Evans; E J Ladusans; S Rimmer; L D Burnell; N Thakker; P A Farndon
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Frequency of Pathogenic Germline Variants in Cancer-Susceptibility Genes in Patients With Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Lisa Mirabello; Bin Zhu; Roelof Koster; Eric Karlins; Michael Dean; Meredith Yeager; Matthew Gianferante; Logan G Spector; Lindsay M Morton; Danielle Karyadi; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Smita Bhatia; Lei Song; Nathan Pankratz; Maisa Pinheiro; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Richard Gorlick; Silvia Regina Caminada de Toledo; Antonio S Petrilli; Ana Patino-Garcia; Fernando Lecanda; Miriam Gutierrez-Jimeno; Massimo Serra; Claudia Hattinger; Piero Picci; Katia Scotlandi; Adrienne M Flanagan; Roberto Tirabosco; Maria Fernanda Amary; Nilgün Kurucu; Inci Ergurhan Ilhan; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Donald A Barkauskas; Gerardo Mejia-Baltodano; Patricia Valverde; Belynda D Hicks; Bin Zhu; Mingyi Wang; Amy A Hutchinson; Margaret Tucker; Joshua Sampson; Maria T Landi; Neal D Freedman; Susan Gapstur; Brian Carter; Robert N Hoover; Stephen J Chanock; Sharon A Savage
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Molecular Profiling of Hard-to-Treat Childhood and Adolescent Cancers.

Authors:  Fida Khater; Stephanie Vairy; Sylvie Langlois; Sophie Dumoucel; Thomas Sontag; Pascal St-Onge; Henrique Bittencourt; Dorothée Dal Soglio; Josette Champagne; Michel Duval; Jean-Marie Leclerc; Caroline Laverdiere; Thai Hoa Tran; Natalie Patey; Benjamin Ellezam; Sébastien Perreault; Nelson Piché; Yvan Samson; Pierre Teira; Nada Jabado; Bruno Michon; Josée Brossard; Monia Marzouki; Sonia Cellot; Daniel Sinnett
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-04-05

7.  Challenges in reporting pathogenic/potentially pathogenic variants in 94 cancer predisposing genes - in pediatric patients screened with NGS panels.

Authors:  Adela Chirita-Emandi; Nicoleta Andreescu; Cristian G Zimbru; Paul Tutac; Smaranda Arghirescu; Margit Serban; Maria Puiu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Nationwide germline whole genome sequencing of 198 consecutive pediatric cancer patients reveals a high frequency of cancer prone syndromes.

Authors:  Anna Byrjalsen; Thomas V O Hansen; Ulrik K Stoltze; Mana M Mehrjouy; Nanna Moeller Barnkob; Lisa L Hjalgrim; René Mathiasen; Charlotte K Lautrup; Pernille A Gregersen; Henrik Hasle; Peder S Wehner; Ruta Tuckuviene; Peter Wad Sackett; Adrian O Laspiur; Maria Rossing; Rasmus L Marvig; Niels Tommerup; Tina Elisabeth Olsen; David Scheie; Ramneek Gupta; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Kjeld Schmiegelow; Karin Wadt
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Prospective pan-cancer germline testing using MSK-IMPACT informs clinical translation in 751 patients with pediatric solid tumors.

Authors:  Elise M Fiala; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Audrey Mauguen; Jennifer A Kennedy; Nancy Bouvier; Yelena Kemel; Megan Harlan Fleischut; Anna Maio; Erin E Salo-Mullen; Margaret Sheehan; Angela G Arnold; Alicia Latham; Maria I Carlo; Karen Cadoo; Semanti Murkherjee; Emily K Slotkin; Tanya Trippett; Julia Glade Bender; Paul A Meyers; Leonard Wexler; Filemon S Dela Cruz; Nai-Kong Cheung; Ellen Basu; Alex Kentsis; Michael Ortiz; Jasmine H Francis; Ira J Dunkel; Yasmin Khakoo; Stephen Gilheeney; Sameer Farouk Sait; Christopher J Forlenza; Maria Sulis; Matthias Karajannis; Shakeel Modak; Justin T Gerstle; Todd E Heaton; Stephen Roberts; Ciyu Yang; Sowmya Jairam; Joseph Vijai; Sabine Topka; Danielle N Friedman; Zsofia K Stadler; Mark Robson; Michael F Berger; Nikolaus Schultz; Marc Ladanyi; Richard J O'Reilly; David H Abramson; Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy; Liying Zhang; Diana Mandelker; Neerav N Shukla; Andrew L Kung; Kenneth Offit; Ahmet Zehir; Michael F Walsh
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 10.  Developing a framework for evidence-based grading and assessment of predictive tools for clinical decision support.

Authors:  Mohamed Khalifa; Farah Magrabi; Blanca Gallego
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical and molecular features of pediatric cancer patients with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah Scollon; Mohammad K Eldomery; Jacquelyn Reuther; Frank Y Lin; Samara L Potter; Lauren Desrosiers; Kenneth L McClain; Valeria Smith; Jack Meng-Fen Su; Rajkumar Venkatramani; Jianhong Hu; Viktoriya Korchina; Neda Zarrin-Khameh; Richard A Gibbs; Donna M Muzny; Christine Eng; Angshumoy Roy; D Williams Parsons; Sharon E Plon
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.838

Review 2.  Genetic Disorders with Predisposition to Paediatric Haematopoietic Malignancies-A Review.

Authors:  Aleksandra Filipiuk; Agata Kozakiewicz; Kamil Kośmider; Monika Lejman; Joanna Zawitkowska
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Merged testing for colorectal cancer syndromes and re-evaluation of genetic variants improve diagnostic yield: Results from a nationwide prospective cohort.

Authors:  Sara Svensson; Theofanis Zagoras; Christos Aravidis; Marie Stenmark Askmalm; Erik Björck; Åke Borg; Ekaterina Kuchinskaya; Mef Nilbert; Margareta Nordling; Anna Rohlin; Gustav Silander; Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinson; Samuel Gebre-Medhin
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.263

Review 4.  Landscape of germline cancer predisposition mutations testing and management in pediatrics: Implications for research and clinical care.

Authors:  Shilpa A Shahani; Erin L Marcotte
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.569

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.