| Literature DB >> 34617412 |
Shingo Takahara1, Shubham Soni1, Kiran Phaterpekar1, Ty T Kim1, Zaid H Maayah1, Jody L Levasseur1, Heidi L Silver1, Darren H Freed2, Mourad Ferdaoussi1, Jason R B Dyck1.
Abstract
AIMS: Recent evidence has demonstrated that ketone bodies, particularly β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), are beneficial to the failing heart due to their potential as an alternative energy substrate as well as their anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties. Exogenous supplementation of ketones also helps prevent heart failure (HF) development in rodent models, but whether ketones can be used to treat HF remains unexplored. Herein, we investigated whether chronic supplementation of ketones is beneficial for the heart in a mouse model of established HF. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Heart failure; Ketone ester; β-Hydroxybutyrate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34617412 PMCID: PMC8712827 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Figure 1Ketone ester supplementation efficiently elevates circulating ketone levels in mice. (A) Circulating BHB levels at 20 min after oral administration of 100 μL of ketone ester (KE) with different concentrations in water (n = 5 per group). Comparisons were made with the vehicle group. (B) Arterial blood pH in the fed state following a 20 h supplementation of 50% KE drink. Pearson's correlation coefficient r with P‐value was calculated to determine correlation between pH and blood BHB levels. (C and D) Food and water consumption were measured with or without 20% KE supplementation in water (n = 7 per group). (E) Caloric intake was calculated based on the food and water consumption (n = 7 per group). (F) Schematic of the study design. C56Bl/6N male mice undergo transverse aortic constriction (TAC) surgery at 8 weeks old. Two to three weeks after surgery, mice in heart failure (30–45% EF) are treated with vehicle or 20% KE in their drinking water for another 2 weeks. After the treatment period, the cardiac function is assessed by echocardiography and mice are euthanized for further analysis of heart. (The figure was created using materials provided by Servier Medical Art, licensed under a Creative Common Attribution 3.0 Generic License; http://smart.servier.com/.) Dots represent individual values. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons were made by the Student's t‐test in (A) and (C–E) and by paired t‐test in (F). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. BHB, β‐hydroxybutyrate; EF, ejection fraction.
Figure 2Chronic ketone ester treatment of mice with heart failure blunted a further decline in cardiac function, ameliorated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and reduced activation of cardiac fibroblasts. (A) Circulating BHB levels at random fed states (n = 7, 6, 11, 13). (B) Change in % ejection fraction during the treatment period in TAC groups (n = 11, 13). (C) The ratio of transcript levels of Myh7 and Myh6 in the heart (n = 7, 6, 11, 13). (D) Representative images and quantification of cardiomyocyte surface area using wheat‐germ‐agglutinin staining conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 (n = 6, 6, 11, 12; 170–298 cells/mouse). The scale bars indicate 100 μm. (E) Representative immunoblots and semi‐quantification of POSTN (periostin)/GAPDH in the hearts (n = 7, 6, 11, 13). (F) Representative images of immunostaining with anti‐POSTN antibody, where the positive is indicated by the brown stain. The scale bars indicate 100 μm. (G) Representative images and quantification of formalin‐fixed LV heart sections stained with picrosirius red (n = 6, 6, 11, 12). The scale bars indicate 200 μm. (H) Schematic of acute intravenous infusions. Blood ketone levels of mice 3–4 weeks post‐TAC undergoing either intravenous BHB or saline infusions for 60 min, and (I) the corresponding changes in cardiac output (n = 5 saline, 6 BHB). Dots represent individual values. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. * indicates the comparison with its sham group in (A) and (C–G). # indicates the comparison between vehicle and ketone in either sham or TAC group. *, # P < 0.05, **, ## P < 0.01. P‐values were derived by repeated two‐way ANOVA in (B) and two‐way ANOVA followed by Sidak's multiple comparisons in (A) and (C–G), and by paired t‐test in (I). BHB, β‐hydroxybutyrate; KE, ketone ester; TAC, transverse aortic constriction.
Metabolic parameters after 2 weeks of treatment with either vehicle or 20% ketone ester drink
| Parameter | Sham | TAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle ( | Ketone ester ( | Vehicle ( | Ketone ester ( | |
| Free fatty acid (mEq/L) | 1.214 ± 0.171 | 1.058 ± 0.191 | 1.129 ± 0.246 | 1.016 ± 0.250 |
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 80.160 ± 15.600 | 72.710 ± 9.435 | 80.000 ± 7.374 | 72.980 ± 12.660 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.357 ± 0.789 | 5.550 ± 0.686 | 5.100 ± 0.956 | 5.342 ± 0.613 |
| Insulin (pg/mL) | 0.214 ± 0.050 | 0.338 ± 0.306 | 0.196 ± 0.044 | 0.345 ± 0.217 |
TAC, transverse aorta constriction.
Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons were made with two‐way ANOVA followed by Sidak's multiple comparisons.
Cardiac function and structure after 2 weeks of treatment with either vehicle or 20% ketone ester drink
| Parameter | Sham | TAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle ( | Ketone ester ( | Vehicle ( | Ketone ester ( | |
| HR, b.p.m. | 387.00 ± 34.74 | 397.08 ± 28.01 | 454.10 ± 64.74 | 465.41 ± 61.37 |
| LVEF, % | 53.08 ± 1.99 | 52.90 ± 4.95 | 30.78 ± 6.83 | 35.15 ± 8.68 |
| FS, % | 26.92 ± 1.27 | 26.90 ± 3.24 | 14.36 ± 3.45 | 16.78 ± 4.54 |
| SV, μL | 36.90 ± 5.81 | 37.47 ± 2.53 | 27.33 ± 5.65 | 29.61 ± 7.61 |
| CO, mL/min | 14.32 ± 2.78 | 14.92 ± 1.98 | 12.32 ± 2.49 | 13.50 ± 4.76 |
| IVSTd, mm | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 0.68 ± 0.04 | 0.93 ± 0.09 | 0.91 ± 0.09 |
| LVPWTd, mm | 0.64 ± 0.05 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 0.93 ± 0.07 |
| LV mass (corrected), mg | 64.36 ± 10.75 | 76.08 ± 6.73 | 139.60 ± 23.77 | 133.00 ± 24.98 |
| LVIDd, mm | 3.83 ± 0.38 | 4.03 ± 0.05 | 4.51 ± 0.29 | 4.38 ± 0.52 |
| LVIDs, mm | 2.87 ± 0.21 | 2.91 ± 0.19 | 3.78 ± 0.35 | 3.63 ± 0.57 |
| E/A | 1.91 ± 0.38 | 1.87 ± 0.45 | 1.64 ± 0.57 | 1.59 ± 0.27 |
| E/e′ | −30.60 ± 4.98 | −28.13 ± 3.77 | −32.80 ± 14.24 | −33.49 ± 7.63 |
| Tei index | 0.38 ± 0.07 | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 0.74 ± 0.19 | 0.74 ± 0.18 |
A, peak velocity mitral flow in late diastole; CO, cardiac output; E, peak velocity mitral flow in early diastole; e′, peak velocity of mitral annulus in early diastole; FS, fractional shortening; HR, heart rate; IVSTd, interventricular septal thickness at end‐diastole; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVIDd/s, left ventricular internal diameter at end‐diastole/systole; LVPWTd, left ventricular posterior wall thickness at end‐diastole; SV, stroke volume; TAC, transverse aortic constriction.
Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons were made with two‐way ANOVA followed by Sidak's multiple comparisons.
indicates the comparison with its sham group.