Literature DB >> 34617406

The demographic and disability characteristics of individuals who regularly attend an urban adaptive fitness center: An observational study.

Sindhoori Nalla1,2, Kevin Huang1,2, Jacqueline Spangenberg3, Liqi Chen4, Prakash Jayabalan1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While it is well known that regular physical activity provides significant physical and psychosocial health benefits, people with disabilities have disproportionately lower rates of exercise compared to the able-bodied population. Reduced levels of physical activity can put this population at an increased risk of chronic health conditions, highlighting the importance of ensuring that our communities have accessible adaptive fitness opportunities.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the demographic and disability characteristics in individuals who regularly attend a specialized urban adaptive fitness center, to provide foundational understanding about the population that uses such resources.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study
SETTING: Specialized urban adaptive fitness center PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-three (n = 63) participants who regularly attend an urban Adaptive Sports and Fitness Center INTERVENTION: Not applicable MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: World Health Organization (WHO) Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0, evaluating disability in six domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation. Results were converted into scores ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (total disability) and compared to WHO published norms for the general population and a demographics intake form.
RESULTS: Participants with mean age of 52.9 ±14.3 years were grouped into three diagnostic categories: spinal cord injury (30.2%), traumatic brain injury/stroke (36.5%), and other neurologic disease/chronic medical disease (33.3%). A total of 45.9% live alone, 96.8% exercise at least twice/week, and 43.5% participate in adaptive sports. Participants travel 8.0 miles on average for attendance. WHODAS disability summary score was 26.48 (86th percentile).
CONCLUSIONS: Although adaptive fitness center participants had a higher level of disability than 80% to 90% of the general population, regular participation was realistic and feasible. Further understanding of the barriers in those who do not engage in such facilities is needed.
© 2021 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34617406      PMCID: PMC8983785          DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PM R        ISSN: 1934-1482            Impact factor:   2.298


  19 in total

1.  Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.

Authors:  T Bedirhan Ustün; Somnath Chatterji; Nenad Kostanjsek; Jürgen Rehm; Cille Kennedy; Joanne Epping-Jordan; Shekhar Saxena; Michael von Korff; Charles Pull
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Disparity in the management of Graves' disease observed at an urban county hospital: a decade-long experience.

Authors:  Judy Jin; Victor Sandoval; Mary E Lawless; Ashwini R Sehgal; Christopher R McHenry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Influence of adapted sport on quality of life: perceptions of athletes with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Diane G Groff; Neil R Lundberg; Ramon B Zabriskie
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Accommodation of wheelchair-reliant individuals by community fitness facilities.

Authors:  D R Dolbow; S F Figoni
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 5.  Impact of Adaptive Sports Participation on Quality of Life.

Authors:  Robert Diaz; Emily K Miller; Emily Kraus; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Perceived benefits and barriers to exercise among persons with physical disabilities or chronic health conditions within action or maintenance stages of exercise.

Authors:  Laurie A Malone; J P Barfield; Joel D Brasher
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.554

7.  The effects of physical activity or sport-based interventions on psychological factors in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Z Bondár; S di Fronso; L Bortoli; C Robazza; G S Metsios; M Bertollo
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2019-12-12

8.  Exercise facilities for neurologically disabled populations - Perceptions from the fitness industry.

Authors:  Cheryl Anderson; Robert L Grant; Michael V Hurley
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 2.554

9.  The Effect of Adaptive Sports on Individuals with Acquired Neurological Disabilities and Its Role in Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Louise Declerck; Jean-François Kaux; Marc Vanderthommen; Thierry Lejeune; Gaëtan Stoquart
Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.733

10.  The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.

Authors:  Katrina L Piercy; Richard P Troiano; Rachel M Ballard; Susan A Carlson; Janet E Fulton; Deborah A Galuska; Stephanie M George; Richard D Olson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 157.335

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Relationship of Social Media Addiction With Internet Use and Perceived Health: The Moderating Effects of Regular Exercise Intervention.

Authors:  Bo-Ching Chen; Mei-Yen Chen; Yu-Feng Wu; Yu-Tai Wu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 2.  Adaptive Sports in Spinal Cord Injury: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ramsey Rayes; Charlotte Ball; Kenneth Lee; Christopher White
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2022-07-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.