Literature DB >> 34614392

B.1.617.2 enters and fuses lung cells with increased efficiency and evades antibodies induced by infection and vaccination.

Prerna Arora1, Anzhalika Sidarovich1, Nadine Krüger2, Amy Kempf1, Inga Nehlmeier2, Luise Graichen1, Anna-Sophie Moldenhauer2, Martin S Winkler3, Sebastian Schulz4, Hans-Martin Jäck4, Metodi V Stankov5, Georg M N Behrens5, Stefan Pöhlmann6, Markus Hoffmann7.   

Abstract

The Delta variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), B.1.617.2, emerged in India and has spread to over 80 countries. B.1.617.2 replaced B.1.1.7 as the dominant virus in the United Kingdom, resulting in a steep increase in new infections, and a similar development is expected for other countries. Effective countermeasures require information on susceptibility of B.1.617.2 to control by antibodies elicited by vaccines and used for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) therapy. We show, using pseudotyping, that B.1.617.2 evades control by antibodies induced upon infection and BNT162b2 vaccination, although to a lesser extent as compared to B.1.351. We find that B.1.617.2 is resistant against bamlanivimab, a monoclonal antibody with emergency use authorization for COVID-19 therapy. Finally, we show increased Calu-3 lung cell entry and enhanced cell-to-cell fusion of B.1.617.2, which may contribute to augmented transmissibility and pathogenicity of this variant. These results identify B.1.617.2 as an immune evasion variant with increased capacity to enter and fuse lung cells.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B.1.617.2; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibody; neutralization; spike

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34614392      PMCID: PMC8487035          DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Rep            Impact factor:   9.423


Introduction

Vaccines based on inactivated whole virus, adenoviral vectors, or mRNAs encoding the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike (S) protein protect against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and allow effective combat against the COVID-19 pandemic (Golob et al., 2021; Polack et al., 2020; Xia et al., 2021). One key feature of these vaccines is their ability to induce the production of neutralizing antibodies in vaccinated individuals. These antibodies interfere with the ability of the S protein to drive viral entry into cells and can exhibit different modes of action. For one, antibodies targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD) can directly block S protein binding to its cellular receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) (Barnes et al., 2020). Furthermore, antibodies directed against epitopes outside the RBD, mainly within the N-terminal domain of the S1 subunit, may sterically block S protein binding to ACE2, lock the S protein in a conformational state that does not allow the RBD to interact with ACE2, or abrogate S protein transition from the pre-fusion to the post-fusion conformation (Chi et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Suryadevara et al., 2021). Current vaccines present the S proteins of viruses circulating early during the pandemic as antigens to the immune system. However, at a later stage of the pandemic, so-called SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) emerged that harbor mutations in the S protein that allow for augmented transmissibility (B.1.1.7, Alpha variant) and/or immune evasion (B.1.351, Beta variant; P.1, Gamma variant) (Plante et al., 2021b). Mutations conferring increased transmissibility might augment binding to the cellular receptor ACE2, while mutations conferring immune evasion alter epitopes of neutralizing antibodies (Plante et al., 2021b). Immune evasion can allow for the infection of convalescent or vaccinated individuals, but vectored and mRNA-based vaccines protect against severe COVID-19 induced by Alpha, Beta, and Gamma VOCs. A massive surge of COVID-19 cases was detected in India between April and May 2021 and was associated with spread of a new variant, B.1.617, that subsequently branched off into B.1.617.1 (or Kappa variant), B.1.617.2 (or Delta variant), and B.1.617.3 variants. The B.1.617.2 variant subsequently spread into more than 80 countries and became dominant in India and the United Kingdom (Campbell et al., 2021; Singh et al., 2021). In the United Kingdom, the spread of B.1.617.2 was associated with a marked increase in cases, and more than 80% of new infections are now due to B.1.617.2. A rapid increase of B.1.617.2 spread is also expected in Germany, the United States, and several other countries, and a recent massive increase of cases in Lisbon, Portugal, that required travel restrictions is believed to be due to B.1.617.2. In order to contain the spread of B.1.617.2, now considered a VOC, it will be critical to determine whether convalescent or vaccinated patients are protected against infection by this variant. Here, we addressed this question using reporter particles pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, which are suitable tools to study SARS-CoV-2 neutralization by antibodies (Riepler et al., 2020; Schmidt et al., 2020).

Results

With respect to the S protein of the ancestral Wuhan-1 isolate (GISAID accession ID:EPI_ISL_406798), the S protein of B.1.617.2 harbors nine mutations in the surface unit, S1, of the S protein and 1 mutation in the transmembrane unit, S2 (Figures 1A and 1B). Mutations T19R, G142D, E156G, F157Δ, and R158Δ are located in the N-terminal domain of S1, which contains epitopes for neutralizing antibodies (Chi et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; McCallum et al., 2021; Suryadevara et al., 2021). The RBD harbors mutations L452R and T478K. The mutation L452R reduces antibody-mediated neutralization (Deng et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021b), and it has been speculated that T478K might increase infectivity (Wang et al., 2021). The mutation D614G is located between the RBD and the S1/S2 cleavage site and is linked to increased ACE2 binding, replication in the upper respiratory tract, and transmission (Figures 1A and 1B; Plante et al., 2021a; Zhou et al., 2021). Finally, P681R might increase cleavage of S protein at the S1/S2 site, while the impact of D950N on S protein-driven entry and its inhibition by antibodies is unknown.
Figure 1

The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 promotes efficient entry into human lung and colon cells, causes more cell-to-cell fusion, and evades antibody-mediated neutralization

(A) Schematic overview of the S protein from SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617.2. RBD, receptor-binding domain; TD, transmembrane domain.

(B) Location of the mutations found in SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617.2 in the context of the trimeric spike protein (color code: light blue, S1 subunit with RBD in dark blue; gray, S2 subunit; orange, S1/S2 and S2′ cleavage sites; red, mutated amino acid residues).

(C) Pseudotyped particles bearing the S protein of wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 or variant B.1.617.2 were inoculated onto the indicated cell lines, and transduction efficiency was quantified by measuring virus-encoded luciferase activity in cell lysates at 16 to 18 h post transduction. Presented are the average (mean) data from 6 biological replicates (each conducted with technical quadruplicates) for which transduction was normalized against SARS-CoV-2 S WT (= 1). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance of differences between WT and B.1.617.2 S proteins was analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t test (p > 0.05, not significant [ns]; ∗∗p ≤ 0.01). See also Figure S1A.

(D) BHK-21 expressing the S protein of WT SARS-CoV-2 or variant B.1.617.2 were subsequently incubated with soluble ACE2 (harboring a C-terminal Fc-tag derived from human IgG) and AlexaFluor-488-conjugated anti-human antibody before being subjected to flow cytometry. ACE2 binding efficiency was analyzed by measuring the geometric mean channel fluorescence at 488 nm. Untransfected cells and cells transfected with empty expression plasmid served as controls. Presented are the average (mean) data from 6 biological replicates (each conducted with single samples). Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance of differences between WT and variant B.1.617.2 S proteins was analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t test (p > 0.05, ns).

(E) Analysis of S protein-induced cell-to-cell fusion. A549-ACE2 cells were transfected with expression plasmid for the indicated S proteins or empty vector (EV). At 24 h post transfection, cells were fixed and subsequently stained with May-Gruenwald and Giemsa solutions.

Presented are representative microscopic images (scale bar, 200 μm). For quantification of fusion efficiency, the total number of nuclei in syncytia per image was counted. Presented are the average (mean) data from 4 biological replicates (each conducted with single samples; for each sample, 3 randomly selected areas were imaged and independently analyzed by 2 persons). Error bars indicate the SEM. Statistical significance of differences between WT and B.1.617.2 S proteins was analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t test (∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001).

(F) Neutralization of particles bearing SARS-CoV-2 WT or B.1.617.2 S proteins by monoclonal antibodies used for COVID-19 therapy. Pseudotyped particles bearing the S protein of WT SARS-CoV-2 or variant B.1.617.2 were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in the presence of escalating concentrations (0.00002, 0.0002, 0.002, 0.02, 0.2, and 2 μg/mL) of the indicated SARS-CoV-2 S protein-specific monoclonal antibody (please see Figure S1B) or an unrelated control antibody (please see Figure S1C) before being inoculated onto Vero cells. Transduction efficiency was quantified by measuring virus-encoded luciferase activity in cell lysates at 16 to 18 h post transduction. Presented are the average (mean) data from a single biological replicate (conducted with technical quadruplicates) for which transduction was normalized against samples that did not contain any antibody (= 0% inhibition). Error bars indicate the SD. The results were confirmed in a separate experiment.

(G) Neutralization of particles bearing SARS-CoV-2 WT, B.1.351, or B.1.617.2 S proteins by antibodies in convalescent plasma. Pseudotyped particles bearing the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 WT, B.1.351 or B.1.617.2 were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in the presence of different dilutions of convalescent plasma (1:25, 1:100, 1:400, 1:1,600, 1:6,400, and 1:25,600). Transduction efficiency was quantified by measuring virus-encoded luciferase activity in cell lysates at 16 to 18 h post transduction and used to calculate the plasma dilution factor that leads to 50% reduction in S protein-driven cell entry (neutralizing titer 50 [NT50]). Presented are the data from a single biological replicate (conducted with technical quadruplicates) for a total of 8 convalescent plasma (black lines indicate the median; error bars indicate the SEM). Statistical significance of differences between the indicated groups was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis analysis with Dunn’s post hoc test (p > 0.05, ns; ∗p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001). Please see also Figure S1D.

(H) The experiment was performed as described for (G), but this time serum from Comirnaty/BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals was investigated. Presented are the data from a single biological replicate (conducted with technical quadruplicates) for a total of 15 vaccinee sera (black lines indicate the median; error bars indicate the SEM). Please see also Figure S1E.

The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 promotes efficient entry into human lung and colon cells, causes more cell-to-cell fusion, and evades antibody-mediated neutralization (A) Schematic overview of the S protein from SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617.2. RBD, receptor-binding domain; TD, transmembrane domain. (B) Location of the mutations found in SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617.2 in the context of the trimeric spike protein (color code: light blue, S1 subunit with RBD in dark blue; gray, S2 subunit; orange, S1/S2 and S2′ cleavage sites; red, mutated amino acid residues). (C) Pseudotyped particles bearing the S protein of wild-type (WT) SARS-CoV-2 or variant B.1.617.2 were inoculated onto the indicated cell lines, and transduction efficiency was quantified by measuring virus-encoded luciferase activity in cell lysates at 16 to 18 h post transduction. Presented are the average (mean) data from 6 biological replicates (each conducted with technical quadruplicates) for which transduction was normalized against SARS-CoV-2 S WT (= 1). Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance of differences between WT and B.1.617.2 S proteins was analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t test (p > 0.05, not significant [ns]; ∗∗p ≤ 0.01). See also Figure S1A. (D) BHK-21 expressing the S protein of WT SARS-CoV-2 or variant B.1.617.2 were subsequently incubated with soluble ACE2 (harboring a C-terminal Fc-tag derived from human IgG) and AlexaFluor-488-conjugated anti-human antibody before being subjected to flow cytometry. ACE2 binding efficiency was analyzed by measuring the geometric mean channel fluorescence at 488 nm. Untransfected cells and cells transfected with empty expression plasmid served as controls. Presented are the average (mean) data from 6 biological replicates (each conducted with single samples). Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance of differences between WT and variant B.1.617.2 S proteins was analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t test (p > 0.05, ns). (E) Analysis of S protein-induced cell-to-cell fusion. A549-ACE2 cells were transfected with expression plasmid for the indicated S proteins or empty vector (EV). At 24 h post transfection, cells were fixed and subsequently stained with May-Gruenwald and Giemsa solutions. Presented are representative microscopic images (scale bar, 200 μm). For quantification of fusion efficiency, the total number of nuclei in syncytia per image was counted. Presented are the average (mean) data from 4 biological replicates (each conducted with single samples; for each sample, 3 randomly selected areas were imaged and independently analyzed by 2 persons). Error bars indicate the SEM. Statistical significance of differences between WT and B.1.617.2 S proteins was analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t test (∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001). (F) Neutralization of particles bearing SARS-CoV-2 WT or B.1.617.2 S proteins by monoclonal antibodies used for COVID-19 therapy. Pseudotyped particles bearing the S protein of WT SARS-CoV-2 or variant B.1.617.2 were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in the presence of escalating concentrations (0.00002, 0.0002, 0.002, 0.02, 0.2, and 2 μg/mL) of the indicated SARS-CoV-2 S protein-specific monoclonal antibody (please see Figure S1B) or an unrelated control antibody (please see Figure S1C) before being inoculated onto Vero cells. Transduction efficiency was quantified by measuring virus-encoded luciferase activity in cell lysates at 16 to 18 h post transduction. Presented are the average (mean) data from a single biological replicate (conducted with technical quadruplicates) for which transduction was normalized against samples that did not contain any antibody (= 0% inhibition). Error bars indicate the SD. The results were confirmed in a separate experiment. (G) Neutralization of particles bearing SARS-CoV-2 WT, B.1.351, or B.1.617.2 S proteins by antibodies in convalescent plasma. Pseudotyped particles bearing the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 WT, B.1.351 or B.1.617.2 were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in the presence of different dilutions of convalescent plasma (1:25, 1:100, 1:400, 1:1,600, 1:6,400, and 1:25,600). Transduction efficiency was quantified by measuring virus-encoded luciferase activity in cell lysates at 16 to 18 h post transduction and used to calculate the plasma dilution factor that leads to 50% reduction in S protein-driven cell entry (neutralizing titer 50 [NT50]). Presented are the data from a single biological replicate (conducted with technical quadruplicates) for a total of 8 convalescent plasma (black lines indicate the median; error bars indicate the SEM). Statistical significance of differences between the indicated groups was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis analysis with Dunn’s post hoc test (p > 0.05, ns; ∗p ≤ 0.05; ∗∗p ≤ 0.01; ∗∗∗p ≤ 0.001). Please see also Figure S1D. (H) The experiment was performed as described for (G), but this time serum from Comirnaty/BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals was investigated. Presented are the data from a single biological replicate (conducted with technical quadruplicates) for a total of 15 vaccinee sera (black lines indicate the median; error bars indicate the SEM). Please see also Figure S1E. We first asked whether the B.1.617.2 S protein mediates robust entry into cell lines frequently used for SARS-CoV-2 research, Vero (African green monkey, kidney), 293T (human, kidney), Caco-2 (human, colon), and Calu-3 (human, lung). All cell lines express endogenous ACE2 and Vero, Caco-2, and Calu-3 cells are often used for infection studies with authentic SARS-CoV-2. The B.1.617.2 S protein mediated entry into 293T and Vero cells with the same efficiency as the wild-type (WT) S protein, while entry into Caco-2 (∼1.5-fold) and Calu-3 cells (∼2.0-fold) was augmented (Figures 1C and S1A). The lung is the central target of SARS-CoV-2, but infection of the colon has also been reported, suggesting that B.1.617.2 might have an increased capacity to enter target cells in these tissues. Finally, we did not detect increased ACE2 binding of the B.1.617.2 S protein (Figure 1D), suggesting that increased entry into Caco-2 and Calu-3 cells was not due to augmented ACE2 binding. Besides its ability to drive fusion of viral and cellular membranes, the S protein is further able to drive the fusion of neighboring cells, resulting in the formation of multinucleated giant cells, so called syncytia, which have been observed in vitro following directed S protein expression or SARS-CoV-2 infection and in postmortem tissues from COVID-19 patients (Bussani et al., 2020; Tian et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2020). Since SARS-CoV-2 S protein-driven syncytium formation is believed to contribute to COVID-19 pathogenesis, we investigated the ability of the B.1.617.2 S protein to drive cell-to-cell fusion in the human lung cell line A549, which was engineered to express high levels of ACE2. As expected, directed expression of WT S led to the formation of syncytia, while syncytia formation was not observed when cells were transfected with empty expression plasmid (Figure 1E). Strikingly, directed expression of the B.1.617.2 S protein caused more and larger syncytia, and quantification of cell-to-cell fusion revealed that fusion by the B.1.617.2 S protein was ∼2.5-fold more effective as compared to the WT S protein (Figure 1E). We next determined whether entry of B.1.617.2 was susceptible to inhibition by recombinant antibodies with emergency use authorization for COVID-19 treatment (Figure S1B). Three out of four antibodies tested inhibited the B.1.617.2 S protein with similar efficiency as the WT S protein (Figures 1F and S1C). However, B.1.617.2 was resistant to bamlanivimab, most likely because of the mutation L452R (Figure S1B; Starr et al., 2021). Thus, bamlanivimab monotherapy is not suitable for prevention or treatment of B.1.617.2 infection. Finally, we asked whether B.1.617.2 entry is inhibited by antibodies generated by infected or vaccinated individuals. For these experiments, we employed the S protein of B.1.351 as control since this VOC exhibits marked evasion from neutralizing antibodies. A previously described collection of plasma (Hoffmann et al., 2021a) from convalescent COVID-19 patients collected at University Hospital Göttingen, Germany, neutralized entry driven by the B.1.617.2 S protein with a slightly reduced efficiency as compared to the WT S protein (Figures 1G and S1D). In contrast, neutralization of the B.1.351 S protein-dependent entry was markedly reduced. Finally, similar observations were made with previously characterized sera (Hoffmann et al., 2021b) from donors who received two doses of BNT162b2, although immune evasion of B.1.617.2 was more prominent as compared to convalescent sera (Figures 1H and S1E).

Discussion

Our results demonstrate immune evasion, enhanced colon- and lung cell entry, and augmented syncytium formation by B.1.617.2. Evasion of antibody-mediated neutralization by B.1.617.2 is in agreement with two recent studies (Liu et al., 2021a; Wall et al., 2021), and although it is more prominent than previously observed by us for B.1.1.7, it is clearly less prominent as compared to B.1.351 (Hoffmann et al., 2021a). This finding would be compatible with increased vaccine breakthrough of B.1.617.2 but also suggests that BNT162b2 should still protect from B.1.617.2-induced COVID-19. Treatment of infection with bamlanivimab alone will be ineffective, but our data indicate that casirivimab, imdevimab, and etesevimab will remain effective treatment options for B.1.617.2-infected patients, especially when administered early after infection. The observation that the B.1.617.2 S protein is able to cause more cell-to-cell fusion than the WT S protein may suggest that B.1.617.2 could cause more tissue damage, and thus be more pathogenic, than previous variants, and that viral spread via syncytium formation could contribute to efficient inter- and intra-host spread of this variant. Entry experiments with cell lines need to be interpreted with care, and confirmation with primary cells is pending. However, the significantly increased entry into the colon and lung cell lines Caco-2 and Calu-3, respectively, suggests that B.1.617.2 might have an augmented capacity to infect these organs, and increased infection of the respiratory epithelium might account for the purported increased transmissibility of B.1.617.2.

STAR★Methods

Key resources table

Resource availability

Lead contact

Requests for material can be directed to Markus Hoffmann (mhoffmann@dpz.eu) and the lead contact, Stefan Pöhlmann (spoehlmann@dpz.eu).

Materials availability

All materials and reagents will be made available upon installment of a material transfer agreement (MTA).

Experimental model and subject details

Cell culture

All cell lines were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. 293T (human, female, kidney; ACC-635, DSMZ; RRID: CVCL_0063), Vero76 cells (African green monkey kidney, female, kidney; CRL-1586, ATCC; RRID: CVCL_0574, kindly provided by Andrea Maisner), BHK-21 (Syrian hamster, male, kidney; CCL-10, ATCC; RRID: CVCL_1915, kindly provided by Georg Herrler) and A549-ACE2 cells (Hoffmann et al., 2021a), which were derived from parental A549 cells (human, male, lung; CRM-CCL-185, ATCC; RRID:CVCL_0023; kindly provided by Georg Herrler), were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (PAN-Biotech) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Biochrom), 100 U/ml penicillin and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (pen/strep) (PAN-Biotech). In addition, Calu-3 (human, male, lung; HTB-55, ATCC; RRID: CVCL_0609, kindly provided by Stephan Ludwig) and Caco-2 cells (human, male, colon; HTB-37, ATCC, RRID: CVCL_0025) were cultured in minimum essential medium (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% pen/strep, 1x non-essential amino acid solution (from 100x stock, PAA) and 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cell lines were validated by STR-typing, amplification and sequencing of a fragment of the cytochrome c oxidase gene, microscopic examination and/or according to their growth characteristics. Furthermore, all cell lines were routinely tested for contamination by mycoplasma contamination.

Method details

Expression plasmids

Plasmids encoding pCAGGS-DsRed, pCAGGS-VSV-G (vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein), pCG1-WT SARS-CoV-2 S (codon optimized, based on the Wuhan/Hu-1/2019 isolate, equipped with D614G mutation; with C-terminal truncation of the last 18 amino acid), pCG1-SARS-CoV-2 S B.1.351 (codon optimized; with C-terminal truncation of the last 18 amino acid), ACE2 (angiotensin converting enzyme 2) and soluble ACE2 have been previously described (Hoffmann et al., 2020, 2021a, 2021b). In order to generate the expression vector for the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617.2, the respective mutations were inserted into the WT SARS-CoV-2 S sequence by splice-overlap PCR. The resulting open reading frame was further inserted into vector pCG1 plasmid (kindly provided by Roberto Cattaneo, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA), using BamHI and XbaI restriction enzymes. The integrity of all sequences was confirmed by sequence analysis using a commercial sequencing service (Microsynth SeqLab). Specific details on the cloning procedure can be obtained upon request. Transfection of 293T cells was carried out by the calcium-phosphate precipitation method, while BHK-21 and A549-ACE2 cells were transfected using Lipofectamine LTX (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Sequence analysis and protein models

The S protein sequence of SARS-CoV-2 S variant B.1.617.2 (GISAID Accession ID: EPI_ISL_1921353) was obtained from the GISAID (global initiative on sharing all influenza data) databank (https://www.gisaid.org/). Protein models were generated employing the YASARA software (http://www.yasara.org/index.html) and are based on published crystal structure PDB: 6XDG (Hansen et al., 2020), PDB: 7L3N (Jones et al., 2020) or PDB: 7C01 (Shi et al., 2020), or a template that was constructed by modeling the SARS-2 S sequence on PDB: 6XR8 (Cai et al., 2020), using the SWISS-MODEL online tool (https://swissmodel.expasy.org)

Production of pseudotype particles

Rhabdoviral pseudotypes bearing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were generated according to an established protocol (Berger Rentsch and Zimmer, 2011). Briefly, 293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding S protein, VSV-G or empty plasmid (control). At 24 h posttransfection, cells were inoculated with a replication-deficient vesicular stomatitis virus that lacks the genetic information for VSV-G and instead codes for two reporter proteins, enhanced green fluorescent protein and firefly luciferase (FLuc), VSV∗ΔG-FLuc (kindly provided by Gert Zimmer) at a multiplicity of infection of 3. Following 1 h of incubation at 37°C, the inoculum was removed and cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Subsequently, cells received culture medium containing anti-VSV-G antibody (culture supernatant from I1-hybridoma cells; ATCC no. CRL-2700; except for cells expressing VSV-G, which received only medium) in order to neutralize residual input virus. After 16-18 h, the culture supernatant was harvested, clarified from cellular debris by centrifugation at 4,000 x g, 10 min, aliquoted and stored at −80°C.

Transduction of target cells

For transduction experiments, target cells were seeded in 96-well plates and inoculated with equal volumes of pseudotype particles. The transduction efficiency was evaluated at 16-18 h post transduction. For this, cells were lysed in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 (Carl Roth) for 30 min at RT. Afterward, cell lysates were transferred into white 96-well plates and mixed with luciferase substrate (Beetle- Juice, PJK) before luminescence was recorded using a Hidex Sense Plate luminometer (Hidex).

Analysis of ACE2 binding

For the production of soluble ACE2 fused to the Fc portion of human immunoglobulin G (IgG), sol-ACE2, 293T cells were seeded in a T-75 flask and transfected with 20 μg of sol-ACE2 expression plasmid. The medium was replaced at 10 h posttransfection and cells were further incubated for 38 h. Further, the culture supernatant was harvested and clarified by centrifugation at 2,000 x g, 10 min, 4°C. Next, the clarified supernatant was loaded onto Vivaspin protein concentrator columns (molecular weight cut-off of 30 kDa; Sartorius) and centrifuged at 4,000 x g at 4°C until the supernatant was 100-fold concentrated. Finally, concentrated sol-ACE2 was aliquoted and stored at −80°C. In order to test the binding efficiency of sol-ACE2 to S protein, BHK-21 cells were seeded in 12-well plates and transfected with expression plasmid for WT or SARS-CoV-2 S variant. Untransfected cells and cells transfected with empty pCG1 plasmid served as controls. At 24 h posttransfection, the culture supernatant was removed and cells were washed and resuspended in PBS and transferred into 1.5 ml reaction tubes before being pelleted by centrifugation (600 x g, 5 min, RT, all centrifugation steps). Thereafter, cells were washed with PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; PBS/BSA) and pelleted again by centrifugation. Next, the supernatant was removed and cell pellets were incubated with 100 μl of solACE2-Fc (1:100 in PBS/BSA) and rotated for 1 h at 4°C using a Rotospin eppi rotator disk (IKA). After incubation, cells were pelleted and incubated with 100 μl of human AlexaFluor-488-conjugated antibody (1:200 in PBS/BSA; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and rotated again as described above. Finally, cells were washed and resuspended in PBS/BSA and subjected to flow cytometry using an LSR II flow cytometer and the FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences). Data analysis was performed using the FCS express 4 Flow research software (De Novo Software) in order to obtain the geometric mean values.

Syncytium formation assay

In order to analyze S protein-driven cell-to-cell fusion, A549-ACE2 cells were grown in 12-well plates and transfected with expression vector for WT or B.1.617.2 S protein. In addition, cells transfected with empty plasmid served as control. At 24 h posttransfection, cells were washed with PBS and fixed by incubation (20 min, room temperature) with 4% paraformaldehyde solution (Carl Roth). Thereafter, cells were washed with deionized water, air-dried and stained with May-Gruenwald solution (30 min, room temperature; Sigma-Aldrich). Next, cells were washed three times with deionized water, air-dried and stained with 1:10 diluted Giemsa solution (30 min, room temperature; Sigma-Aldrich). Finally, cells were washed three times with deionized water, air-dried and analyzed by bright-field microscopy using a Zeiss LSM800 confocal laser scanning microscope and the ZEN imaging software (Zeiss). For each sample, three randomly selected areas were imaged and S protein-driven syncytium formation was quantified by counting the total number of nuclei in syncytia per image. Syncytia were defined as cells containing at least three nuclei. To eliminate potential bias and correct for counting errors, counting was performed blinded by two persons independently and for each sample average counts were used. Further, for each biological replicate, the average (mean) total number of nuclei in syncytia per image was calculated from three images obtained from randomly selected areas of the well.

Collection of serum and plasma samples

Before analysis, all serum and plasma samples were heat-inactivated at 56°C for 30 min. Further, all plasma/serum samples were pre-screened for their ability to neutralize transduction of Vero cells by pseudotype particles bearing WT SARS-CoV-2 S. Convalescent plasma was obtained from COVID-19 patients treated at the intensive care unit of the University Medicine Göttingen (UMG) under approval given by the ethic committee of the UMG (SeptImmun Study 25/4/19 Ü). Cell Preparation Tube (CPT) vacutainers with sodium citrate were used for collection of convalescent plasma. Further, plasma was collected as supernatant over the peripheral blood mononuclear cell layer. In addition to convalescent plasma, serum from individuals vaccinated with BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine BNT162b2/Comirnaty was collected 24-31 days after receiving the second dose using S-Monovette® EDTA tubes (Sarstedt). Sampling and sample analysis were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hannover Medical School (8973_BO_K_2020, amendment Dec 2020).

Neutralization assay

For neutralization experiments, S protein bearing pseudotype particles were pre-incubated for 30 min at 37°C with different concentrations of casirivimab, imdevimab, bamlanivimab, etesevimab, or unrelated control IgG (2, 0.2, 0.02, 0.002, 0.0002, 0.00002 μg/ml). Alternatively, pseudotype particles were pre-incubated with different dilutions (1:25, 1:100, 1:400, 1:1,600 and 1:6,400) of convalescent plasma or serum from BNT162b2/Comirnaty vaccinated individuals. Following incubation, mixtures were inoculated onto Vero cells with particles incubated only with medium serving as control. Transduction efficiency was determined at 16-18 h postinoculation as described above.

Quantification and statistical analysis

The results on S protein-driven cell entry represent average (mean) data acquired from six biological replicates, each conducted with four technical replicates. Data were normalized against WT S protein, for which entry was set as 1. Alternatively, transduction was normalized against the background signal (luminescence measured for cells inoculated with particles bearing no viral glycoprotein; set as 1). Sol-ACE2 binding results are average (mean) data obtained from six biological replicates, each conducted with single samples. Each data point represents the geometric mean channel fluorescence for one biological replicate without normalization. Data on S protein-driven cell-to-cell fusion represent average (mean) data from four biological replicates, each conducted with single samples (three images per sample). Each data point represents the average (mean) number of nuclei in syncytia per image from two counting events by independent persons for each of the four biological replicates without normalization. The neutralization data are based on a single experiment (standard in the field), which was conducted with technical quadruplicates. For data normalization, background signals (Fluc signals obtained from cell inoculated with pseudotype particles bearing no S protein) were subtracted from all values and transduction by particles incubated only with medium was set as 0% inhibition. The neutralizing titer 50 (NT50) value, which indicates the plasma/serum dilution that causes a 50% reduction of transduction efficiency, was calculated using a non-linear regression model (inhibitor versus normalized response, variable slope). Error bars are defined as either standard deviation (SD, ACE2 binding and neutralization data for monoclonal antibodies) or standard error of the mean (SEM, all other data). Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel (as part of the Microsoft Office software package, version 2019, Microsoft Corporation) and GraphPad Prism 8 version 8.4.3 (GraphPad Software). Statistical significance was tested by two-tailed Student’s t test (pseudotype entry, ACE2 binding and cell-cell fusion assays) or Kruskal-Wallis analysis with Dunn’s post hoc test (neutralization assays). Only p values of 0.05 or lower were considered statistically significant (p > 0.05, not significant [ns]; p ≤ 0.05, ∗; p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗; p ≤ 0.001, ∗∗∗). Details on the statistical test and the error bars can be found in the figure legends.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Antibodies

CasirivimabLaboratory of Hans-Martin JäckN/A
ImdevimabLaboratory of Hans-Martin JäckN/A
BamlanivimabLaboratory of Hans-Martin JäckN/A
EtesevimabLaboratory of Hans-Martin JäckN/A
hIgGLaboratory of Hans-Martin JäckN/A
Goat anti-Human IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 488Thermo Fisher ScientificCat# A-11013; RRID: AB_2534080
Anti-VSV-G antibody (I1, produced from CRL-2700 mouse hybridoma cells)ATCCCat# CRL-2700; RRID: CVCL_G654

Bacterial and virus strains

VSVΔG-FLucLaboratory of Gert ZimmerN/A
One Shot OmniMAX 2 T1R Chemically Competent E. coliThermo Fisher ScientificCat# C854003

Biological samples

Patient Plasma (SI 15)Laboratory of Martin Sebastian WinklerN/A
Patient Plasma (SI 18)Laboratory of Martin Sebastian WinklerN/A
Patient Plasma (SI 22)Laboratory of Martin Sebastian WinklerN/A
Patient Plasma (SI 23)Laboratory of Martin Sebastian WinklerN/A
Patient Plasma (SI 24)Laboratory of Martin Sebastian WinklerN/A
Patient Plasma (SI 27)Laboratory of Martin Sebastian WinklerN/A
Patient Plasma (SI 33)Laboratory of Martin Sebastian WinklerN/A
Patient Plasma (SI 51)Laboratory of Martin Sebastian WinklerN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4844)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4846)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4847)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4848)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4849)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4863)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4864)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4865)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4866)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4867)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4868)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4872)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4874)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4876)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A
Vaccinee Serum (ID4877)Laboratory of Georg M.N. BehrensN/A

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Soluble human ACE2 (sol-hACE2-Fc)Laboratory of Stefan PöhlmannN/A

Critical commercial assays

Beetle-Juice KitPJKCat# 102511

Experimental models: Cell lines

293TDSMZCat# ACC-635; RRID: CVCL_0063
A549 (ACE2)Laboratory of Stefan PöhlmannN/A
BHK-21Laboratory of Georg HerrlerATCC Cat# CCL-10; RRID:CVCL_1915
Caco-2Laboratory of Stefan PöhlmannATCC Cat# HTB-37; RRID: CVCL_0025
Calu-3Laboratory of Stephan LudwigATCC Cat# HTB-55; RRID: CVCL_0609
Vero76Laboratory of Andrea MaisnerATCC Cat# CRL-1586; RRID: CVCL_0574

Oligonucleotides

SARS-2-S (BamHI) F (AAGGCCGGATCCGCCACCATGTTCGTGTTTCTGGTGCTGC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-SΔ18 (XbaI) R (AAGGCCTCTAGACTACTTGCAGCAGCTGCCACAG)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (T19R) F (GTGAACCTGCGCACAAGAACCCAGCTGCCTCCAGC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (T19R) R (GTTCTTGTGCGCAGGTTCACACACTGGCTGGAC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (E142D) F (CCTTCCTGGACGTCTACTATCACAAGAAC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (E142D) R (TAGTAGACGTCCAGGAAGGGGTCGTTGCAGAAC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (E142D/E156G/F157Δ/R158Δ) Hyb F (GTTCTGCAACGACCCCTTCCTGGACGTCTACTATCACAAGAACAACAAGAGCTGG)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (E142D/E156G/F157Δ/R158Δ) Hyb R (CAGTTGTTGGCGCTGCTGTACACCCCGCTTTCCATCCAGCTCTTGTTGTTCTTGTGATAG)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (E156G/F157Δ/R158Δ) F (TGGAAAGCGGGGTGTACAGCAGCGCCAACAACTGC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (E156G/F157Δ/R158Δ) R (GCTGTACACCCCGCTTTCCATCCAGCTCTTGTTG)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (L452R) F (TACAATTACCGGTACCGGCTGTTCCGGAAGTC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (L452R) R (CAGCCGGTACcGGTAATTGTAGTTGCCGCCGAC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (L452R/T478K) Hyb F (ACAATTACCGGTACCGGCTGTTCCGGAAGTCCAATCTGAAGCCCTTCGAGCGGGACATC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (L452R/T478K) Hyb R (TTACAAGGTTTGCTGCCGGCCTGATAGATCTCGGTGGAGATGTCCCGCTCGAAGGGCTTC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (T478K) F (CCGGCAGCAAACCTTGTAACGGCGTGGAAGGCTTC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (T478K) R (GTTACAAGGTTTGCTGCCGGCCTGATAGATCTCG)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (P681R) F (CAAACAGCCGCAGACGGGCCAGATCTGTG)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (P681R) R (GCCCGTCTGCGGCTGTTTGTCTGTGTCTG)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (D950N) F (AAGCTGCAGAACGTGGTCAACCAGAATGCCCAGG)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S (D950N) R (TGACCACGTTCTGCAGCTTTCCCAGGGCGCTTGC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S Seq-01 (CAAGATCTACAGCAAGCACACC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S Seq-02 (GTCGGCGGCAACTACAATTAC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S Seq-03 (CTGTCTGATCGGAGCCGAGCAC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S Seq-04 (TGAGATGATCGCCCAGTACAC)Sigma-AldrichN/A
SARS-2-S Seq-05 (GCCATCTGCCACGACGGCAAAG)Sigma-AldrichN/A
pCG1 F (CCTGGGCAACGTGCTGGT)Sigma-AldrichN/A
pCG1 R (GTCAGATGCTCAAGGGGCTTCA)Sigma-AldrichN/A

Recombinant DNA

Plasmid: pCG1Laboratory of Roberto CattaneoN/A
Plasmid: pCAGGS-VSV-GLaboratory of Stefan PöhlmannN/A
Plasmid: pCAGGS-DsRedLaboratory of Stefan PöhlmannN/A
Plasmid: pCG1-SARS-2-SΔ18 (D614G), codon-optimizedLaboratory of Stefan PöhlmannN/A
Plasmid: pCG1-SARS-2-SΔ18 (B.1.351), codon-optimizedLaboratory of Stefan PöhlmannN/A
Plasmid: pCG1-SARS-2-SΔ18 (B.1.617.2), codon-optimizedLaboratory of Stefan PöhlmannN/A
Plasmid: pCG1-solACE2-FcLaboratory of Stefan PöhlmannN/A

Software and algorithms

Hidex Sense Microplate Reader SoftwareHidex Deutschland Vertrieb GmbHhttps://www.hidex.de
YASARA (version 19.1.27)YASARA Biosciences GmbHhttp://www.yasara.org
Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended (version 12.0 × 32)Adobehttps://www.adobe.com/
GraphPad Prism (version 8.3.0(538))GraphPad Softwarehttps://www.graphpad.com/
ZEN imaging softwareCarl Zeisshttps://www.zeiss.com/corporate/int/home.html
Microsoft Office Standard 2010 (version 14.0.7232.5000)Microsoft Corporationhttps://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-365

Other

Complex of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain with the Fab fragments of two neutralizing antibodies (PDB: 6XDG)Hansen et al., 2020https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6XDG
SARS-CoV 2 Spike Protein bound to LY-CoV555 (PDB: 7L3N)Jones et al., 2020https://www.rcsb.org/structure/7L3N
Molecular basis for a potent human neutralizing antibody targeting SARS-CoV-2 RBD (PDB: 7C01)Shi et al., 2020https://www.rcsb.org/structure/7C01
Distinct conformational states of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (PDB: 6XR8)Cai et al., 2020https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6XR8
  31 in total

1.  SARS-CoV-2 spike D614G change enhances replication and transmission.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Tran Thi Nhu Thao; Donata Hoffmann; Adriano Taddeo; Nadine Ebert; Fabien Labroussaa; Anne Pohlmann; Jacqueline King; Silvio Steiner; Jenna N Kelly; Jasmine Portmann; Nico Joel Halwe; Lorenz Ulrich; Bettina Salome Trüeb; Xiaoyu Fan; Bernd Hoffmann; Li Wang; Lisa Thomann; Xudong Lin; Hanspeter Stalder; Berta Pozzi; Simone de Brot; Nannan Jiang; Dan Cui; Jaber Hossain; Malania M Wilson; Matthew W Keller; Thomas J Stark; John R Barnes; Ronald Dijkman; Joerg Jores; Charaf Benarafa; David E Wentworth; Volker Thiel; Martin Beer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Potent neutralizing antibodies against multiple epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 spike.

Authors:  Lihong Liu; Pengfei Wang; Manoj S Nair; Jian Yu; Micah Rapp; Qian Wang; Yang Luo; Jasper F-W Chan; Vincent Sahi; Amir Figueroa; Xinzheng V Guo; Gabriele Cerutti; Jude Bimela; Jason Gorman; Tongqing Zhou; Zhiwei Chen; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Peter D Kwong; Joseph G Sodroski; Michael T Yin; Zizhang Sheng; Yaoxing Huang; Lawrence Shapiro; David D Ho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial.

Authors:  Shengli Xia; Yuntao Zhang; Yanxia Wang; Hui Wang; Yunkai Yang; George Fu Gao; Wenjie Tan; Guizhen Wu; Miao Xu; Zhiyong Lou; Weijin Huang; Wenbo Xu; Baoying Huang; Huijuan Wang; Wei Wang; Wei Zhang; Na Li; Zhiqiang Xie; Ling Ding; Wangyang You; Yuxiu Zhao; Xuqin Yang; Yang Liu; Qian Wang; Lili Huang; Yongli Yang; Guangxue Xu; Bojian Luo; Wenling Wang; Peipei Liu; Wanshen Guo; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Identification of SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations that attenuate monoclonal and serum antibody neutralization.

Authors:  Zhuoming Liu; Laura A VanBlargan; Louis-Marie Bloyet; Paul W Rothlauf; Rita E Chen; Spencer Stumpf; Haiyan Zhao; John M Errico; Elitza S Theel; Mariel J Liebeskind; Brynn Alford; William J Buchser; Ali H Ellebedy; Daved H Fremont; Michael S Diamond; Sean P J Whelan
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 31.316

5.  SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and P.1 escape from neutralizing antibodies.

Authors:  Markus Hoffmann; Prerna Arora; Rüdiger Groß; Alina Seidel; Bojan F Hörnich; Alexander S Hahn; Nadine Krüger; Luise Graichen; Heike Hofmann-Winkler; Amy Kempf; Martin S Winkler; Sebastian Schulz; Hans-Martin Jäck; Bernd Jahrsdörfer; Hubert Schrezenmeier; Martin Müller; Alexander Kleger; Jan Münch; Stefan Pöhlmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Complete map of SARS-CoV-2 RBD mutations that escape the monoclonal antibody LY-CoV555 and its cocktail with LY-CoV016.

Authors:  Tyler N Starr; Allison J Greaney; Adam S Dingens; Jesse D Bloom
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2021-04-05

7.  Neutralizing and protective human monoclonal antibodies recognizing the N-terminal domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Authors:  Naveenchandra Suryadevara; Swathi Shrihari; Pavlo Gilchuk; Laura A VanBlargan; Elad Binshtein; Seth J Zost; Rachel S Nargi; Rachel E Sutton; Emma S Winkler; Elaine C Chen; Mallorie E Fouch; Edgar Davidson; Benjamin J Doranz; Rita E Chen; Pei-Yong Shi; Robert H Carnahan; Larissa B Thackray; Michael S Diamond; James E Crowe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Comparison of Four SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays.

Authors:  Lydia Riepler; Annika Rössler; Albert Falch; André Volland; Wegene Borena; Dorothee von Laer; Janine Kimpel
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-28

9.  Pathological findings of COVID-19 associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Zhe Xu; Lei Shi; Yijin Wang; Jiyuan Zhang; Lei Huang; Chao Zhang; Shuhong Liu; Peng Zhao; Hongxia Liu; Li Zhu; Yanhong Tai; Changqing Bai; Tingting Gao; Jinwen Song; Peng Xia; Jinghui Dong; Jingmin Zhao; Fu-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 30.700

10.  Measuring SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody activity using pseudotyped and chimeric viruses.

Authors:  Fabian Schmidt; Yiska Weisblum; Frauke Muecksch; Hans-Heinrich Hoffmann; Eleftherios Michailidis; Julio C C Lorenzi; Pilar Mendoza; Magdalena Rutkowska; Eva Bednarski; Christian Gaebler; Marianna Agudelo; Alice Cho; Zijun Wang; Anna Gazumyan; Melissa Cipolla; Marina Caskey; Davide F Robbiani; Michel C Nussenzweig; Charles M Rice; Theodora Hatziioannou; Paul D Bieniasz
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 17.579

View more
  31 in total

1.  The rise and spread of the SARS-CoV-2 AY.122 lineage in Russia.

Authors:  Galya V Klink; Ksenia R Safina; Elena Nabieva; Nikita Shvyrev; Sofya Garushyants; Evgeniia Alekseeva; Andrey B Komissarov; Daria M Danilenko; Andrei A Pochtovyi; Elizaveta V Divisenko; Lyudmila A Vasilchenko; Elena V Shidlovskaya; Nadezhda A Kuznetsova; Anna S Speranskaya; Andrei E Samoilov; Alexey D Neverov; Anfisa V Popova; Gennady G Fedonin; Vasiliy G Akimkin; Dmitry Lioznov; Vladimir A Gushchin; Vladimir Shchur; Georgii A Bazykin
Journal:  Virus Evol       Date:  2022-03-05

2.  Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain during the First Two Years of the Pandemic: Circulating Variants, Amino Acid Conservation, and Genetic Variability in Structural, Non-Structural, and Accessory Proteins.

Authors:  Paloma Troyano-Hernáez; Roberto Reinosa; África Holguín
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Monoclonal antibody therapies against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Daniele Focosi; Scott McConnell; Arturo Casadevall; Emiliano Cappello; Giulia Valdiserra; Marco Tuccori
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 71.421

4.  Integrin/TGF-β1 Inhibitor GLPG-0187 Blocks SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron Pseudovirus Infection of Airway Epithelial Cells In Vitro, Which Could Attenuate Disease Severity.

Authors:  Kelsey E Huntington; Lindsey Carlsen; Eui-Young So; Matthias Piesche; Olin Liang; Wafik S El-Deiry
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17

5.  Integrin/TGF-β1 inhibitor GLPG-0187 blocks SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron pseudovirus infection of airway epithelial cells which could attenuate disease severity.

Authors:  Kelsey E Huntington; Lindsey Carlsen; Eui-Young So; Matthias Piesche; Olin Liang; Wafik S El-Deiry
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2022-01-03

6.  The rise and spread of the SARS-CoV-2 AY.122 lineage in Russia.

Authors:  Galya V Klink; Ksenia Safina; Elena Nabieva; Nikita Shvyrev; Sofya Garushyants; Evgeniia Alekseeva; Andrey B Komissarov; Daria M Danilenko; Andrei A Pochtovyi; Elizaveta V Divisenko; Lyudmila A Vasilchenko; Elena V Shidlovskaya; Nadezhda A Kuznetsova; Andrei E Samoilov; Alexey D Neverov; Anfisa V Popova; Gennady G Fedonin; Vasiliy G Akimkin; Dmitry Lioznov; Vladimir A Gushchin; Vladimir Shchur; Georgii A Bazykin
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-12-05

7.  Detection and Interspecies Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant (AY.3) in Feces from a Domestic Cat and Human Samples.

Authors:  Olivia C Lenz; Andrew D Marques; Brendan J Kelly; Kyle G Rodino; Stephen D Cole; Ranawaka A P M Perera; Susan R Weiss; Frederic D Bushman; Elizabeth M Lennon
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2022-02-02

8.  SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant shows less efficient replication and fusion activity when compared with Delta variant in TMPRSS2-expressed cells.

Authors:  Hanjun Zhao; Lu Lu; Zheng Peng; Lin-Lei Chen; Xinjin Meng; Chuyuan Zhang; Jonathan Daniel Ip; Wan-Mui Chan; Allen Wing-Ho Chu; Kwok-Hung Chan; Dong-Yan Jin; Honglin Chen; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Kelvin Kai-Wang To
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 7.163

9.  Modeling the Transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant in a Partially Vaccinated Population.

Authors:  Ugo Avila-Ponce de León; Eric Avila-Vales; Kuanlin Huang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 10.  The Development of SARS-CoV-2 Variants: The Gene Makes the Disease.

Authors:  Raquel Perez-Gomez
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2021-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.